Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Megatronman vs HSBC


megatronman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5156 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

forgive my not getting through all this and just cut to the chase and i'll give you my thoughts - they are offering 1079, you wanted 1258? so far, have i got it? what is all this - i'll show these letters in court business - are you asking for something other than charges + 8%interest + court fee? if so, what and why. tell me, in a nutshell and i'll tell you what i think - for what that's worth - i'll tell you now - i'm thinking if they've mentioned court fee fine i'd probably advice split the dif and send a letter stating that (i'll send a template if you want one) if they haven't mentioned court fee - send a letter saying if you add on 125 for court filing fee then you'd take it (again - i'll send a template if you want one)

which is slightly beter than splitting the dif.

 

reason being - i don't like all this threatening talk from them - even if it's bluster - they look like dragging their heels on this one - you give in a little - then you look the one trying to settle and they are the ones stalling - above it looks a bit the other way around.

i'm inclined to think it's time to make this one go away. but tell me the bare bones and i'll tell you what i think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying lat

they are offering 1079, you wanted 1258? so far, have i got it? what is all this - i'll show these letters in court business - are you asking for something other than charges + 8%interest + court fee?

Yes I am asking for charges + debited interest + CI (am excempt from court fees, which is probably another reason why they are dragging this out, since they won't have to pay them either.). The 1073 is their own calculation of charges + stat interest. The 1258 is charges + debited interest before stat interest or CI is added.
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i'm still in the outer reaches here with this a little - if you are saying you put all the debited interest on - then i think you'd better grab the offer (maybe the half way negotiation theory) and run with it - as you should have used the advanced spreadsheet and it adjudges what portion of each interest debit can be reclaimed - either some, all or none of each interest debit depending on the account balance at the time. so, if you've claimed all of each interest debit - i'm surprised they offered that much. take it! as for contractual interest - that is probably another reason they are stalling. so, my advice (worth as much as you paid for it!) is go for the negotiated half way between. as before, if you want a template letter to tweak - let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry lat, I think there is some confusion here.

I did use vamp's advanced spready so the 1258 figure is correct, in that it is made up of accumulated charges plus the portion of interest charged as a result of those charges (not the entire interest I paid on my o/d) I also tested the same amounts on mindzai's version and got the same exact figure. Are you suggesting I should make an offer for an amount half way between the stat interest and contractual? This would be around the £1700 mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, i'm with you now, so, why not figure what your charges would be at 8% and ask for that - it seems a good compromise to me - because they are offering 8% in their own words:

The statutary interest, pursuant to s69 County Court Act 1984, is in our opinion, adequate recompense in respect of the charge from the date it was applied to the date of your claim

Here's a little blurb you could include regarding the o/d interest:

You should be aware that my claim for overdraft interest has been meticulously calculated and double checked. It only ever relates to the cumulative charges within the overdrawn balance of the account at the point that the overdraft interest was debited.

If it is that in your view the interest is not claimable, I am prepared to discuss this with yourseves and the judge in court.

So, would your charges plus 8% bring it up to an acceptable figure for you?

Thank them for their previous offer - then how about another little paragraph like:

 

I am mindful of the vast number of claims with which you are currently dealing. In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £xxxx. (a figure you could live with). I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention.

 

For your records, I enclose another copy of my schedule of charges. I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

and include any other requests you have - like a cheque or whatever.

 

could you justify more than the 1258 by using 8% interest and possible the daily rate (which shouldn't include interest).

 

i just am afraid you have taken such a hard line with them - they are showing their teeth and daring you to take it to the judges - which you may be happy to do - it might be - as crusher always says - nothing more than a game of chicken. - maybe you feel you should hold out - and if you do - best of luck - i'll watch with interest to see how you get on - i'm just feeling a little shaky over it -

if no one else jumps in here - you might like to pm a moderator to come take a look at it all and give their opinion.

livelylad is always a good bet for a frank opinion.

let me know what you decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello.

I'm posting this here as well as on my thread as I have searched the forums and can't find the answer I'm looking for.

My hearing has been set for 31st August, but I want to change my poc. I calculated the daily interest (from the claim date) incorrectly and since the date of my claim was 6th December 2006, it's added up to a quite significant amount. Also I didn't include the supply of goods act, which I wanted, but this part seems to have been removed from the template since last time I looked so I'm not sure now. I'm not sure if I write to the banks solicitors first or take the amended form to the court for the judge to approve. I have the n244 form ready.

On top of all this, the bank have just closed my account and sold my overdraft to their dca.

Really would appreciate any help

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My hearing has been set for 31st August, but I want to change my poc. I calculated the daily interest (from the claim date) incorrectly and since the date of my claim was 6th December 2006, it's added up to a quite significant amount. Also I didn't include the supply of goods act, which I wanted, but this part seems to have been removed from the template since last time I looked so I'm not sure now. I'm not sure if I write to the banks solicitors first or take the amended form to the court for the judge to approve. I have the n244 form ready.

On top of all this, the bank have just closed my account and sold my overdraft to their dca.

Really would appreciate any help

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You send the N244 to the court with the fee which is non recoverable.

The bank should not have closed your account as it is subject to legal proceedings and therefore in dispute - it is in the banking code around sec 13 I think.

I would write a letter to them point ing this out.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just an update. I received this letter from Metropolitan Collection Services today, dated 13 July.

You have failed to make payment as requested and we therefore now have no alternative but to take further action against you.

 

This may involve: Debt Collectors who may call at your door, or

DG Solicitors issuing legal proceedings which may result in:

 

- a County Court Judgment being registered against you;

-a County Court Bailiff visiting your home and taking goods;

- an Attachment of Earnings order which may result may result in your current or future employer being ordered to deduct payments from your salary.

 

If legal action is taken, it will result in legal fees and costs of £193.00 being added to your outstanding balance.

 

...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Had this letter from DG Solicitors today.

25 February 2010

 

Dear Megatronman,

 

Our records show that you complained about the level of charges applied to your account.

 

Consequently your account was put on hold pending the outcome of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) Test case.

 

The legal proceedings ended on 25 November 2009, with the Supreme Court confirming that the bank charges are not capable of amounting to penalties at common law and that the level of them cannot be assessed for fairness under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations. On 22 December 2009 the OFT confirmed that it was ending its investigation into the fairness of overdraft charges.

 

In the circumstances the bank wroe to all customers with outstanding complaints confirming that no refund of charges would be made.

 

Accordingly, as the complaint has now been rejected, we now require your proposals for repayment of the above debt within the next 14 days.

 

If we do not hear from you within this time, we will continue with recovery action.

 

We trust that this explains our position and we look forward to hearing from you within the next 14 days.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

DG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have drafted a letter to send to HSBC regarding the default I have on my file.

I'm not sure if this is the correct way to go about this so, as usual, if anyone has any advice it would be appreciated.

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account number: xxxxxxxx

Sort code: xxxxxxxxx

 

I have recently checked my credit file and note the ‘default notice’ entry which was registered by you on 15/06/2007.

I note that paragraph 2.2.4 of your terms and conditions states that ‘provided if there is no genuine dispute about the amount owed, we may register the default with the CRAs’.

You will be aware I disputed the legality of charges applied to my account in August 2006. I am therefore curious as to which term in my agreement grants you the right to register a default on the account under these circumstances.

Further, I have no recollection of receiving a default notice, or any correspondance stating your intention to file a notice prior to the date the entry was made.

Therefore, I must request you to substantiate such a notice at your earliest convenience by providing me with:

 

1. The signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

2. A true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee.

 

I would request that this data is provided to myself within the next 28 days, if you are unable to provide this data then I must insist that it is removed from my files as unsubstantiated. Yours faithfully

Megatronman

Edited by megatronman
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...