Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IND ltd / county court action


mark2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4448 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i hope i have posted in the correct section on the site i have been browsing your site and its nice to see people giving advice and helping others out to stand upto these companys.

 

The question i have is.

 

I just recived a Judgment for Claiment notice and this is to do with an overdrarft i had with llyods TSB as a guess quite a lot of years ago it was an overdraft i even asked for and for the sum of £1000 but was handy and i always kept below it apart from one month i was close to the £1000 limit and llyods payed them selves from my account and took me over my over draft and then charged me an extortionate rate for going over even though it was them who had put me over. I went into the local branch and explained what they had done was unfair and the charges should be waivered they refused so i was strait up and told them i would no longer use the account.

 

That must of been around 5 Years ago + now and i have never had any corispondance from llyods untill i now recieved a Judgment for claiment ( in default letter ) and the claimant is IND ltd i have never heard of them before or recieved any other letter just simply this Judgement letter and i presume it has something to do with llyods as the figure for the required amount is roughly the same and they are the only people i have ever not paid due to the way they treated me. Along with that letter i also recieved a letter Notice of Transfer of proceedings to a local court to me.

 

 

So what i need to know is what do i do about this as i did not have a signed credit agreement i had no corrispondance from llyods until i now heard from IND any advice would be apreciated

 

 

Thanks for you time

Edited by mark2000
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive a 'Claim form' from Northampton CCBC?

 

I had that "Judgment for Claimant" notice and "Notice of Transfer of proceedings to a local court" roughly 1 month AFTER receiving/ignoring the "Claim form" from Northampton CCBC.

 

Sounds to me like you either didn't receive the Claim Form or you ignored it like I did, which I regret doing.

 

Have you also checked your credit file?

Go to: http://www.trustonline.org.uk/ - £4 - to see if you have a CCJ, don't use equifax/others as it didn't come up with them (with me anyway)

Edited by TheDude1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just checked on the above site and yes there is a CCJ been entered against me

 

Then NO defence was submitted to the claim, whether it is because of no form received or you ignored it - the Judgment (CCJ) has been entered by Default.

 

One option is to apply for a Judgment set-aside (The CCJ is removed from the Register) This makes the Claim go back a step and you'll be given the oppurtunity to submit a Defence (Request Documents etc As the debt might not even be enforceable). But proving why Judgment should be set-aside to the Judge is tough! He may or may not grant it - providing how good your defence is - "Lost in the Mail" is not good enough and he will most likely dismiss the set-aside unless a good story is to be told i.e. you were not residing at the address the Claim forms were served and you CAN prove this.

 

Should you be granted Judgment set-aside and then your unable to defend the Claim (i.e They produce signed agreement etc) - You'll be given 14 days to pay the debt in full (or settlement). If you pay, you will not get a CCJ.

 

Another option for you, is to find out if the debt has become Statute Barred (6 years or more since last payment).

 

In order to find out when your last payment was, you need send a SAR off to Lloyds. If last payment was over 6 years ago, the debt is not enforceable and this is a good defence to getting the CCJ set-aside.

 

Other than that, if you fail to get set-aside, they will enforce the CCJ to get money from you i.e Attachment of Earnings, Attachment of Earnings through your employer (if you fail to strictly pay them monthly), charging order against property you own - Basically them having a Judgment on you, gives them more power to get the money from you.

 

Hope this helps, keep in mind though it's only knowledge to what I have gone through recently plus mostly others helping me in a similar situation!

 

good luck mate

Edited by TheDude1
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your time but how do i go about getting the set asside proceedur i have not recived any other paperwork from them except the one in my first post so its unfair i have not been able to stand up for myself or given the chance and thinking about it that may even of been over 6 years ago with llyods i know this may sound a stupid question but how do i go about getting that info from llyods i dont know the account number or anything now

Link to post
Share on other sites

llyods i know this may sound a stupid question but how do i go about getting that info from llyods i dont know the account number or anything now

 

You can send a Subject Access Request off to LLoyds.

 

But you can also SAR the cliamant.

 

Contact the courts and ask them to confirm at what address the Claim was served.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had you received the claim form, you would have sent a CPR 31.14 to IND.

 

Using court procedures to formally request proof that IND legally own this account, you should have received a Notice of assignment stating when the OC sold the account. Without this, they have no legal right to issue the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had you received the claim form, you would have sent a CPR 31.14 to IND.

 

Using court procedures to formally request proof that IND legally own this account, you should have received a Notice of assignment stating when the OC sold the account. Without this, they have no legal right to issue the claim.

 

The only thing i have ever recieved from IND is a Judgement for Claiment ( in default )

 

I have not recvieved any other paperwork im gusing it is to do with llyods as that is the only people i have ever owed money to in my life so i have no details of what its for im only guesing its llyods only ever recieved this Judgement for Claimant ( in default )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats really odd.

 

You need to speak to the courts tomorrow and get them to confirm to what address they issued the claim.

 

Debbie x

 

I will have to do that thanks as I have not received anything will they ghive me the chance to apeal against it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to do that thanks as I have not received anything will they ghive me the chance to apeal against it ?

 

 

Are you still at the address from the time of the debt or have you moved recently.

 

It seems odd that you received the Judgment but not the Claim Form etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you still at the address from the time of the debt or have you moved recently.

 

It seems odd that you received the Judgment but not the Claim Form etc.

 

I have move but that was not recently there has also been documents my works has posted to me that I have not received whether they will arrive at a later date I don't know but up until now I have not received anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have move but that was not recently there has also been documents my works has posted to me that I have not received whether they will arrive at a later date I don't know but up until now I have not received anything

 

 

 

Very strange indeed. The Court forms may have been lost in the post but if the Court sent them to the correct address then it would cause problems for any application to set aside on the basis that the docs were not received...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...