Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Broadband Connection Problems - Any Cheap Way to Fix Them?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We've been having persistent drop outs of our internet connection for 4 or 5 months. We've tried phoning our ISP (Be Broadband) who took us through some troubleshooting steps which didn't solve the problem. The process broke down because we don't seem to have a "test socket" in our flat, or at least we couldn't find anything that looked like a "test socket".

 

Basically at the end they just told us that they can't do anything to fix it and if we want it fixed we should phone BT, who will charge us £130 (or so) for a call-out charge and if it's a problem with the internal wiring of the flat, and not the external phone line, then they won't fix it at all, but will still charge us for the call-out.

 

Anyway, before we actually do this we were wondering if there are any better options. What we'd really like is just to get someone round who knows what they're doing and who can check the connection and diagnose the problem. We're both middle aged types who don't have a clue what we're doing with this sort of thing, yet there doesn't seem to be anybody you can call (other than BT). Very frustrating.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how many phone sockets have you got?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try pluging your router into the main socket with a filter and have nothing else on any of the other sockets you have. sounds like to many extensions running from the main socket and causing the line to drop due to noise...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should say that even though there are seven sockets, we don't have anything plugged into any of them. Just the broadband plugged in with a filter into one socket. Some of the sockets don't seem to work at all, some of them the broadband works when we plug it in. We've tried using different sockets for the broadband and one seems to work the best, but still drops out frequently. We're not sure which one is the main socket.

 

Is there anything we could do to cut down on noise on the line? The tech guy we phoned at Be mentioned that if you just put microfilters in each socket that's not being used it can cut down on noise, but I don't know if that's nonsense or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would suspect that the issue is with the 'ring' around all the sockets

you say some work some dont, if wires are disconnected

then they'll introduce noise.

 

you 'should' be able to find you master socket, just look where the feed comes into your flat

trace the bt line into your property.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The tech guy we phoned at Be mentioned that if you just put microfilters in each socket that's not being used it can cut down on noise, but I don't know if that's nonsense or not.

 

Utter rubbish. Your main socket should be differnt to the rest and most likely have a bt logo on the front of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i would suspect that the issue is with the 'ring' around all the sockets

you say some work some dont, if wires are disconnected

then they'll introduce noise.

 

you 'should' be able to find you master socket, just look where the feed comes into your flat

trace the bt line into your property.

 

dx

 

Thanks for the help. That certainly seems like it could be the problem. We still can't find the master (or test) socket, though. We've had someone round who at least half knew what he was doing and he couldn't find it either. It's a flat in a big complex and there just isn't anything that looks like a master socket and nothing with a plate that can be removed. We can't really trace where the line enters the property either.

 

If it was a problem with the ring around all the sockets how would you go about getting that fixed? Would BT do that or would we be looking at someone else?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not set in stone that you have a socket that IS a master vesion

it might just be a normal one.

 

typically the line in from outside your flat will come from the internal structure central trunking

and wont be on an outside wall as you say its a flat? there are other flats in the 'block'?

 

by popping off each socket so you can see the routing of the wires in/out of the box you might well be able to workout

which it the incomer as the others will be a 'ring' going to all the others, if you get what i mean

bit like how xmas lights work.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...