Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was caught shoplifting 4 items £20 worth, I’m petrified the Police will come to my house now please can you help. What can I do I worried about my job. 
    • I heard nothing more from J&P but have now had an email from the bank saying they have instructed IDR to act on their behalf?  so are they just passing it back? Selling it on again? I don’t know if this is a good or bad thing 
    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA appeal allowed


Jason6416
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4357 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You should be getting £53.45 personal allowance and £32.35 support component. (The £26.75 is the WRAG component)

 

 

Has this changed recently? When I processed ESA, people under 25 who were placed in the WRAG or SG received the same personal allowance as those over 25. That was a while ago, as you know, so I could have outdated information.

 

Jason, they're still wrong and have incorrectly implemented the Tribunal decision. You referred to sanctions - did they say why a sanction has been applied?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i dont no she wouldnt tell me what has been sanctioned i dont no what i need to do now and yes before my medical i used to get the over 25 year allowance but now she told me they are only paying £53.45 and i told them thats wrong and they said i am still in the wrag group they wont listen me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this changed recently? When I processed ESA, people under 25 who were placed in the WRAG or SG received the same personal allowance as those over 25. That was a while ago, as you know, so I could have outdated information.

 

Jason, they're still wrong and have incorrectly implemented the Tribunal decision. You referred to sanctions - did they say why a sanction has been applied?

 

Oh balls. You are absolutely right, Antone. The £53.45 only applies during the assessment phase for under 25's.

 

My sincered apologies, Jason. Now that you are in the main phase of ESA, you should be getting £67.50 a week personal allowance and £32.35 support component. If you have a sanction on your claim however it could be less.

 

Unfortunately I can't say what to do next because there are still unanswered questions. You really need to speak to a decision maker; the people at the contact centre are not trained, don't have your paperwork and cannot really answer anything beyond what is on the computer screen. When you phoned the second time, did they arrange for a callback tomorrow? If so, and you don't have one by 12pm, phone and ask for an 'escalation'. An escalation is when you have not had a call back when one has been arranged and they will have a manager arrange for someone to call you within the hour. If they haven't arranged for a call back tomorrow, phone the moment the lines open and absolutely insist (be polite but firm) that you get a call back from an ESA decision maker. Tell them you rang twice yesterday, they have applied the tribunal decision incorrectly and you would like it sorted out - only an ESA decision maker can sort it out, the contact centre cannot.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh balls. You are absolutely right, Antone. The £53.45 only applies during the assessment phase for under 25's.

 

My sincered apologies, Jason. Now that you are in the main phase of ESA, you should be getting £67.50 a week personal allowance and £32.35 support component. If you have a sanction on your claim however it could be less.

 

Unfortunately I can't say what to do next because there are still unanswered questions. You really need to speak to a decision maker; the people at the contact centre are not trained, don't have your paperwork and cannot really answer anything beyond what is on the computer screen. When you phoned the second time, did they arrange for a callback tomorrow? If so, and you don't have one by 12pm, phone and ask for an 'escalation'. An escalation is when you have not had a call back when one has been arranged and they will have a manager arrange for someone to call you within the hour. If they haven't arranged for a call back tomorrow, phone the moment the lines open and absolutely insist (be polite but firm) that you get a call back from an ESA decision maker. Tell them you rang twice yesterday, they have applied the tribunal decision incorrectly and you would like it sorted out - only an ESA decision maker can sort it out, the contact centre cannot.

 

Hi Erika I phoned them this morning they said they was going to ring between 2 and 4 and never did so I will ring tomorrow and ask for a call back they have sanctioned some of my benefit and I don't no why so I will ask them why tomorrow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite, I think there is a premium but I'm not certain about ESA and the premiums though I am aware of them in relation to other benefits. Antone would be the man to ask.

 

Normally as far as I go with ESA is getting the claimant an award, by appeal unfortunately! To that end, my familiarity mainly lies with the legislation concerning entitlement in itself. It took me long enough to learn about the criteria for ESA when it came out and it's only in the last couple of years I've been advising on it. Even now I frequently badger Antone and others when a complex ESA case appears here as I don't have the answers.

 

Jason's case is pretty straightforward in that he doesn't appear to have been placed in the group that the legislation says he's entitled to be placed in. But if there is an additional premium too then we need to be asking about that also, so thanks for bringing it up - and if anyone knows for certain if there is a premium, speak up!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite is correct - everyone in the SG gets the EDP. It should be added automatically by the JSAPS computer system when a person is placed in that group.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all thanks for help i will ring them back up tommorow and ask for a call back and ask about support group and the sanction i phoned them today and no reply from them and does a sanction mean that some of my money has been suspended or stopped altogether

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all thanks for help i will ring them back up tommorow and ask for a call back and ask about support group and the sanction i phoned them today and no reply from them and does a sanction mean that some of my money has been suspended or stopped altogether

 

Good plan - refer back to Erika's posts for the questions you need to ask. If we're to advise you further, we need that information.

 

Sanctions on ESA are normally applied if you fail to attend a Work Focused Interview at the Jobcentre or private provider. It means that the extra WRAG component of your payment is reduced or stopped entirely. Even if you have failed to attend such an interview, the sanction should no longer apply to you as the Tribunal has placed you in the Support Group.

 

If they've applied a sanction for another reason, we need to know what it is. Also, if they're aware of the Tribunal decision (in full, and not just the fact that you won the appeal) and are choosing not to implement it, we need to know what their reasons are for doing this. I stress the word "choosing" because quite often these sorts of things are mistakes rather than intentional behaviour.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good plan - refer back to Erika's posts for the questions you need to ask. If we're to advise you further, we need that information.

 

Sanctions on ESA are normally applied if you fail to attend a Work Focused Interview at the Jobcentre or private provider. It means that the extra WRAG component of your payment is reduced or stopped entirely. Even if you have failed to attend such an interview, the sanction should no longer apply to you as the Tribunal has placed you in the Support Group.

 

If they've applied a sanction for another reason, we need to know what it is. Also, if they're aware of the Tribunal decision (in full, and not just the fact that you won the appeal) and are choosing not to implement it, we need to know what their reasons are for doing this. I stress the word "choosing" because quite often these sorts of things are mistakes rather than intentional behaviour.

 

Hi ive always been to the work focused interviews at my job center they never really contacted me for one but if they did i always went to it i dont no why its been sanctioned i am ringing them tomorrow and need it sorting out they wouldnt tell me today on phone what the sanction was for

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ive always been to the work focused interviews at my job center they never really contacted me for one but if they did i always went to it i dont no why its been sanctioned i am ringing them tomorrow and need it sorting out they wouldnt tell me today on phone what the sanction was for

 

Fair enough. The people who answer the phones probably don't know why any sanction was imposed (the reason shows up on the computer in the form of an obscure code number plus an unhelpful 5 word description). That's why speaking to the Decision Maker is important.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Erika i went to my local job center about the sanction and they told me that the person i phoned was wrong there is not a sanction on my account but they said im still in wrag group and i just recieved a letter from them that states im in the wrag group so i phoned them and they said do i want to appeal about the support group and i said yes, if i appeal the the group will any of my money get stopped again and now my payments are only £91.40 a week not £94.25 will you help me Erika with filling the appeal form out i would be very greatful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to appeal the group - you have won your appeal and the right along with it to go into the support group. The jobcentre have no more say than the contact centre in your ESA claim - they, like the contact centre can only tell you what they can see on the screen in front of them.

 

As I said before, you need to speak to an ESA Decision Maker. That can only be acheived by getting a call back from the benefit centre, following the process I posted about before. Please call the number on your letters and ask for a call back from an ESA decision maker.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to appeal the group - you have won your appeal and the right along with it to go into the support group. The jobcentre have no more say than the contact centre in your ESA claim - they, like the contact centre can only tell you what they can see on the screen in front of them.

 

As I said before, you need to speak to an ESA Decision Maker. That can only be acheived by getting a call back from the benefit centre, following the process I posted about before. Please call the number on your letters and ask for a call back from an ESA decision maker.

 

Hi Erika i got a phone call back from DWP this morning and i told her that i should be in the support group so she says she had a look and it says on my appeal letter that they have from the tribunal and she told me it says they have put me in the wrag group she told me shes sending it out to me through post but i dont understand it because my appeal letter i have says different

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so it seems they are saying the Tribunal has told you one thing and the DWP another. I'd suggest that we wait until you receive the letter from them. When you get it, could you post the exact text of the letter here for us to check? Once we see that, we'll figure out what to do next.

  • Confused 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so it seems they are saying the Tribunal has told you one thing and the DWP another. I'd suggest that we wait until you receive the letter from them. When you get it, could you post the exact text of the letter here for us to check? Once we see that, we'll figure out what to do next.

 

Ok thanks antone when i get letter i will let you all no and post it up here you all have been great help to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something is far wrong here. The Tribunal don't say what group you go into - they'll either say regulation 35 applies or it doesn't. It's the regulation that determines the group. If the tribunal states in the claimant's notification letter that regulation 35 applies but they have stated on the DWP copy that it doesn't apply then it's an issue that the tribunal have to sort out, not the DWP as the DWP are supposed to act on the information that they get from the tribunal. I can't give you any advice until I know whether DWP are misunderstanding the tribunals paperwork, or the tribunal have made an error in their paperwork. I need to know what the problem is in order to solve it. That said, I'm very aware of the time contraints involved, and you only have two days left to request a statement of reasons from the tribunal. To that end, I think that you should write to the tribunal service explaining the situation and request a statement of reasons for their decision. There is a template below for you.

 

Your address

Your national insurance number

your case reference number

the date

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Social Entitlement Chamber

Employment and Support Allowance Appeal Tribunal held on 22/12/2011

 

I attended a hearing at (enter tribunal location) on 22/12/2011 in regard to my appeal against a decision to disallow me Employment and Support Allowance. My appeal was successful and I have received my notification which states that regulation 35 of the Employment and Support Allowance regulations applies.

 

However, the Department of Work and Pensions are refusing to implement regulation 35 and informed me during a telephone conversation on 20/01/2012 that their copy of the notification from the tribunal did not contain this information.

 

I would therefore be grateful if you could confirm whether regulation 35 applies in my case, and provide a statement of reasons concerning the decision of the tribunal.

 

yours sincerely

your name.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for writing this for me but who do i send it to because i dont no whether to send it to the place i went to tribunal or do you no the address to send it i live in Mexborough near Doncaster in South Yorkshire where is the nearest tribual services

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should send it to the address that is on the letter from the tribunal notifying you of their decision.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should send it to the address that is on the letter from the tribunal notifying you of their decision.

 

Hi i have wrote the letter out you gave me should i put a copy of the tribunal decision inside with it aswell and i have found the address where i am sending it to

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i have wrote the letter out you gave me should i put a copy of the tribunal decision inside with it aswell and i have found the address where i am sending it to

 

They should already have a copy of the letter, but there's no harm in including one. Just don't send your only copy. Use your scanner (if you have one) or a library photocopier or whatever.

 

But whatever, don't delay sending this letter. Include a copy of the Tribunal letter, sure, if you can, but if you can't for any reason, still send the letter Erika has suggested.

 

ETA: Second paragraph added on edit.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi was just wondering about backdated payments if your appeal is upheld..i was sent for a medical on 21.06.11 and didnt recieve a decision till 2.9.11 which said i had failed my medical..i won my appeal im just curious when do they backdate the payments from is it from the date you have your medical or is it when they make the decision, any help on this subject would be greatly appreciated thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...