Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bailiffs visit today - Girlfriend in a panic


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4587 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

 

I am new here so please bear with me!

 

I recently moved in with my Girlfriend who due to a lack of support from her ex husband is struggling under a mountain of debt both credit cards from the time they were together and council tax arrears.

 

Today a bailiff has turned up on the doorstep demand full payment of an outstanding council tax debt. I knew about this but was very surprised as to how indiscrete the bailiff was. He offered no indentification and did not enquire as to who I was but handed me a removal notice and informed me that the opportunity to pay in installments has passed and my girlfriend needs to pay £570 immeadiately this is on top of the £1000 she paid in august for a debt of around £1300.

 

Has the bailiff given my girlfriend grounds for complaint due to discussing her account with me? We are willing to settle the debt but would rather do so directly with the council and not incur further charges with this firm of bailiffs.

 

My girlfriend is obviously angry and embarrassed about today and is willing to pay but with xmas right upon us would rather spread the payments.

 

Many thanks

 

Concerned boyfriend

Link to post
Share on other sites

could you give us some details about the debt bailiff is chasing first thing is you dont have to pay them you can pay council direct (regardless of what council say) using online/telephone payment system. also pay a regular amount (say £10 a month as you have paid majority of it) what we need to see is the charges the bailiff has put on, I'm thinking he may be overcharging. once we get council tax sorted also has the bailiff got a walking possession? if not what was he doing handing a removal notice? we can look at other debts too. but lets get bailiffs sorted first.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Padja, thanks for the swift response.

 

The debt is for unpaid council tax from this year.

The bailiff claimed he has a walking possession but this is definitely not the case as they have not been into her house.

Edited by Concerned boyfriend
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Padja, thanks for the swift response.

 

The debt is for unpaid council tax from this year.

The bailiff claimed he has a walking possession but this is definitely not the case as they have not been into her house.

 

In which case you don't have to let them in, keep him out and make sure there is no car or other vehicle around he can levy. If he turns up film him with a mobile phone even as he will try to lie cheat and bully his way in

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been said ....pay the Council online at a rate that is affordable and sustainable to your circumstances, you must ensure these payments are made on the same day/date every week/month. Meanwhile you need to gather further information from both Council and Bailiff's, the latter is adept at lying so you must contact the Council with the following the questions. Below this is a template to obtain info from the Bailiff, which will show if the charges applied to your account are legally allowed or simply what the bailiff hopes you will cough up without question.

 

1 - how many Liability Orders there are

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the address(es) they relate to

4 - the period(s) of time they cover

5 - how much each one is for

6 - how much is outstanding on each

7 - the names the Liability Orders are in

8 - the date(s) they were passed for enforcement

 

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject access request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi concerned

 

Would you be described as a 'Vulnerable Person',

 

List of vulnerable persons it is part of The nation standards of Enforcement agents 2002

NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ENFORCEMENT AGENTS MAY 2002

 

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

  • the elderly;
  • people with a disability;
  • the seriously ill;
  • the recently bereaved;
  • single parent families;
  • pregnant women;
  • unemployed people; and,
  • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you have the details of the charges post them back on here, Its not unheard of for bailiff to do levy by guessing whats in property (DVD player, TV, Microwave, etc or he may have looked through window) as long as theres no signature then he can whistle. You will have to pay some bailiff fees but they are set out by law and certainly the last thing you pay also worth checking with council how much they have received from bailiff I suspect not as much as has been paid out to bailiffs.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff back again today.

 

Girlfriend at work, left a letter entitiled - NOTICE TO SEIZE GOODS

 

It threatens attendence with removal porters, using a locksmith if we are not in and charmingly Application for your committal to prison. All unless account settled in 24 hours.

 

Are these just empty threats??

 

They have no walking possession agreement if they return can I forceably remove them from the property as I strongly object to this aggressive action and bullying approach.

 

Advice appreciated as I am furious with this approach

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff back again today.

 

Girlfriend at work, left a letter entitiled - NOTICE TO SEIZE GOODS

 

It threatens attendence with removal porters, using a locksmith if we are not in and charmingly Application for your committal to prison. All unless account settled in 24 hours.

 

Are these just empty threats??

 

They have no walking possession agreement if they return can I forceably remove them from the property as I strongly object to this aggressive action and bullying approach.

 

Advice appreciated as I am furious with this approach

 

The bailiffs have no levy, they haven't had peaceful entry, so they are empty threats. You don't have to let them in, but keep any motor away out of sight, they cannot at this stage commit anyone to prison, bring police to arrest you, locksmiths to break in in your absence.

 

They CAN however list garden furniture etc and levy it, so keep all outside furniture locked away, or will try to levy a random motor parked nearby to try to enable attendance and van fees later.

 

If they turn up whilst you are in try to film them even with the video facility on a mobile phone to record their threats, DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES let them in, for that cosy chat to sort out a payment arrangement.

 

You could pay direct to the council using their online system, and add £42.50 of lawful fees to the amount, at a rate affordable to yourselves but do it regularly on the same day to build up a payment record. tell the council you are doing this. and keep the bailiff out, there is no law that states you must deal with them.

 

Others will no doubt advise further

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

who is the bailiff company? dont name the bailiff.

 

If a Levy has been made then the bailiff has to leave a notice on the goods that have been restrained. If he has not done this then all he can charge is for two visits £42.50.

Pay what ever you owe to the council via their on line payment facility. In form the council that this is what you have done. Also state to the council that the bailiff has made no levy and all that is outstanding are two fees, make sure you add these when you make payment.

 

Dont let the bailiffs in, make sure all cars are moved away from the house and there is nothing in the garden he can levy on.

He cannot come back with a lock smith or the police.

 

As for discussing the matter with you is certainly not allowed.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/613/regulation/45/made

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1988/2050/article/12/made

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1988/2050/article/10/made

 

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm#part7

Edited by seanamarts
My grammar sucks!!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

As your GF is the named debtor and debt predates your relationship, any discussion with you giving details is a breach of data protection, and I would be informing the data protection Commissioner of the breach.

 

Which bailiff firm is this?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As your GF is the named debtor and debt predates your relationship, any discussion with you giving details is a breach of data protection, and I would be informing the data protection Commissioner of the breach.

 

Which bailiff firm is this?

 

Thanks again, I did wonder about data protection, the firm is Jacobs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again, I did wonder about data protection, the firm is Jacobs

 

Say no more, one of theirs approached me at random when I was on the phone in a motor parked opposite an address they were "visiting"

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...