Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • for more information both driving offences were on the same day 18/11/23 so currently fall inside the 6 month mark for prosecution is that correct?
    • You're a wizard with Booking.com, Dave. I'll wait to see if you have any joy talking to your buddy and hope you have a good catch up. Thank you for doing this. I'm not sure the owner of this gite knows what she's doing so I'll certainly mention what you've just said about customer services. I'll wait for the result of your conversation first, though. HB
    • Yes, I noticed that.  Too much of a coincidence methinks!  The OP says they never received a LoC and then in the CPR answer the solicitors say they hold a copy of the LoC but don't include it. I think the best thing is not to request a copy but use this against them in your WS - you never received LoC and indeed in their answer to your CPR request (included an an exhibit in the WS) they included various documents but not the LoC.
    • Frustratingly I've got a voice WhatsApp message from my friend but he's misunderstood the situation and thinks it's you who wants to cancel.  Anyway, I've answered asking if I can call him and hopefully the two of us will be free at the same time today to actually speak on the phone. In the meantime I found this on a page I think meant for people/businesses who have listings on Booking.com How can I communicate with guests to inform them about unforeseen issues at my property and initiate a cancellation? If you’re experiencing unforeseen issues and can’t accommodate your guests, you must report this to our customer service. They will support you with the cancellation request and relocation of the guests, if applicable. https://partner.booking.com/en-gb/help/reservations/changes-cancellations/handling-cancellations-and-guests-cancellation-requests#question-153182 So that's what the host should be doing.  
    • Hi ALl,    Would appreciate some advice and support. I went to insure my car with my partner last night and they refused insurance. I checked my dvla license online and it stated I have been disqualified for 6 months. This is due to 2 driving offences that I failed to identify the driver. I moved house a year ago and completely forgot about changing the registered address. This went to court on 14th May 24 and was given a fine for both and 6 points each totalling 12 points and a 6 month ban. I have read a few things online and spoken to a couple of solicitors for a quick consultation and views and opinions are so varied. Some solicitors are charging extortionate money for something that I know takes 5 mins such as the statuary declaration.    I am going to complete a statutory declaration today and get a solicitor to sign and submit this. But is this just delaying the inevitable? what's the likely hood of being able to overturn this and just pleading guilty to the original 2 offences and take the 3 points for each and a fine with no ban? Any help would be much appreciated, I have been sent the papers by the courts today so have this to hand. Looks like I'm only being charged for the failure to identify and not that and the speeding offence if that makes any difference.    R
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Inland Revenue Debt of 133,914.43 ********Resolved********* ***


Matt63
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Been earning via PAYE only for the last five years.

 

Had tax returns to fill in and found them too complicated. Couldn't work out where you had to calculate the tax that you owed. Arranged an appointment with local HMRC office 30th September, was told I had got the forms mostly correct. Photocopied the forms and posted them off to HMRC by recorded delivery.

 

They say they have not received them. I have told them when and where and they say they have still not received them.

 

Today I received a bill from the tax office for 133,914.43. I am paying £5 a month to my other debts. That's all I can afford. Do you think the Revenue will accept £5 a month?

 

Advice please?! Please help!

 

Thanks

 

Matt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If you have a tax bill of £133k for five years then you are an extremely high earner if your tax is paid under PAYE and you end up with a bill of that amount

 

Something not right here.

 

I think much more detail is needed on this

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I was a high earner! Sadly that is not the case but I did have employment from 4 different companies, one where I got my allowance, one on "BR" and the other two on "D0". I am convinced that the PAYE is correct, but I did find the forms confusing but the lady in the tax office said my forms were basically correct. But there was no where on the forms to put how much tax you thought you owed. But if tax was deducted at source then it has to be OK, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to check the calculation notices, which you would have received from the Revenue, against your P60s to confirm that the gross earnings figure each year is correct.

 

£133K over 5 years averages at an annual tax bill of £26k.

 

Given that you will have paid tax under PAYE already, the logic would suggest that this is a £26k underpayment each year on average which in turn would suggest that you are on "A hell of a salary".

 

Or the calculations are wrong.

 

Something isn't right

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

matt

 

what were you doing prior to the last 5 years paye. self employed? is this an accumulated tax liability for the years before? that is/was not to be collected via paye? or is there an error somewhere?

Edited by Ford
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you copied the forms. Can you take them another copy?

 

As Ford suggests this could be to do with the time before you were employed. If your code was BR then you didn't receive a tax allowance on your PAYE and paid 20% on your full salary.

 

Tax code D0 is for second jobs or pensions and you'll have been paying 40%. HMRC explains it here. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/incometax/check-multiple-codes.htm#2

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Caro that's a good link. Thanks to the others for their comments. Am pretty sure there is no back tax, and having read the link, am pretty sure that I don't actually owe anything as it should all have been sorted out by the PAYE. Will phone them and see why they have sent this demand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know how it goes Matt. :-)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I called them on Saturday, waited on hold for half an hour but could not get through, tried Sunday and they were shut, eventually got through today, all on an expensive 0845 number. Turns out they have a 4 week turn round on paper returns, and in the absence of having "processed" my paper returns they have decided to "estimate" (i.e. guess) my tax and then imposed late payment surcharges and interest on these estimates. What a wonderful system!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh for goodness sake. Maybe if they didn't mess about guessing and got on with the paperwork they'd get more done!!

 

So what happens now?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well today I received a notice that they had "surcharged me" an extra £6,750 because I hadn't paid their incorrect estimate within 28 days. Phoned them up and to ask if they had received my tax returns yet and a pre-recorded message informed me that they were currently taking 5 weeks to process correspondence including tax returns. What a wonderful system they operate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Let's hope they owe you for the other 3 years too! :p

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the returns have now been processed. The total they now say they owe me is about £3,900. But they have decided they won't pay it until they carry out "security checks" which can take "several weeks". Great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The IR has a cheek, they send you an erroneous bill then add penalty charges. They then realise that it is them at error and then make you wait for your refund because of security checks. Makes me wonder what these security checks may be.

 

Personally I would be getting in touch with my MP, although unfortunately they are all on holiday now for 28 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...