Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

and it's a dead certain that crap one were around 2000.

 

Morning peeps and thanks for this excellent thread. In respect of the above quote I dealt with the vicious capquest who refuse to answer the very simple question - have you purchased the debt or are you acting as collection agents?

 

They want 28 days to sort themselves out. They can have it as far as I am concerned. In the meantime cap one have sent me a perfectly pristine copy freshly printed copy of wait for it....their terms and conditions. Not even an application form with my signature on it.

 

In terms of next steps.

 

Do I even bother dealing with capquest or just go back to cap one? I got the standard letter from Crap 1 saying this is your original agreement etc, obviously nothing of the sort.

 

Also they say that under s.78:

 

"We are notrequired to provide a copy of the default notice and statement of default.

 

This is baloney, right? Doesn't matter though because I've got it somewhere.

 

The offence of not providing upon request.

 

Can someone clarify whether this offence is a civil or criminal offence? I think civil but had read somewhere that it is a criminal offence. I just want to be sure.

 

thanks...looks like I've got them already, but obviously a couple of more letters.

 

Finally, if it turns out to be unenforceable and I end up going to court over this to get the defaults removed, can I get back everything I've paid in? Not looking at this yet but would just like to know one way or the other.

 

Keep the faith. EiE.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the usual process of dealing with these requests from Cap 1 - suggest you have a read through the Cap 1 forums and search for others that have gone before you, as we're well versed in this one...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also they say that under s.78:

 

"We are notrequired to provide a copy of the default notice and statement of default.

 

This is baloney, right? Doesn't matter though because I've got it somewhere.

 

The offence of not providing upon request.

 

Can someone clarify whether this offence is a civil or criminal offence? I think civil but had read somewhere that it is a criminal offence. I just want to be sure.

 

They are correct re S78 and the DN.

 

The 'offence' of not providing a copy agreement under S77/78 was repealed a couple of years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they intend on taking you to Court, they must have the Default Notice and Termination Notice to satisfy s.87/s.88 or their claim will fail.

 

Try using CPR to uncover what they do/do not have, exactly.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

Ive paid them 10 grand plus on what looks like being an unenforceable agreement. If I ask for this back (ha ha!) am I making a big mistake?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to read through this thread, EIE;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/84285-ccas-dave-against-world.html

 

It's a long one, but talks about restitution and the dangers and pitfalls of seeking it.

 

I personally think it's very dodgy, but there are members that believe it's possible (there's even some caselaw to back it up) but I wouldn't go for it myself.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Chris

 

have read like a demon. It is indeed an excellent thread. I noticed the fraud act creeping in around page 20 but didn't get past about page 28. There's extensive debate on another thread about the fraud act in relation to mortgage securitisation. I was just wondering whether the wholesale absence of the original CCAs could be due to selling consumer debt on in the form of CDOs? Is the fraud act worth a mention or is it too risky in your eyes.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends what you want to achieve.

 

I'm no consumer champion, believe it or not, so I'm happy with an unenforceable debt being written off.

 

If you feel you want to go for damages to credit reputation, or restitution, as you've suggested, then I wish you luck with it and will be interested to see the outcome. I do feel, though, that a Judge would have a hard time awarding that, despite the fact he can - and probably should - so I would leave well alone.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Im nopt sure if Im posting on the right thread or not... so apologies if Im in the wrong place!

 

Id appreciate some help/advice as still quite new to all this!

 

I sent a CCA request letter and £1 payment to Marshall ward. They cashed cheque and applied the £1 as a payment to my account. Received a letter dated 19 June saying they were "looking into my complaint." On 13th July I wrote to them and sent the time up letter and informing them account is now in dispute. I then received a letter on 21st July stating "Thank you for your letterof 13.07.09 concerning your complaint in relation to your signed credit agreement. Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused you." Then goes on to say they will be in contact once a full investigation of my concerns has been made.

Since then I have recieved yet another monthly statement.

 

What do I do now? Pay now and sit and wait to hear something or send another letter......if so what do I put as I cant seem to find a template letter (or am I just being dim?). Im also receiving default charges whilst this is going on.

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

Ive paid them 10 grand plus on what looks like being an unenforceable agreement. If I ask for this back (ha ha!) am I making a big mistake?

 

Hi Enoughisenough,

 

You have two choices. Add up all your payments for the lifetime of your account plus 30% interest on each payment from when it was made to today (or just before you send your letter off to them). You can get a spreadsheet to do this. OR; add up all their charges during the lifetime of your account and add 30% on each charge, from when it was made to today (etc).

 

Pick whichever is the larger amount. If the charges and interest is the larger sum, add this to your payments (without interest on your payments) and write a letter to the creditor. "As this agreement was unenforceable from inception, you should not have applied charges thereto. I require in reparation (or you can put 'restitution') for harassment, stress and intimidation the amount of £ (total amount you are claiming). I also require that you delete any negative entries you have made on my credit reference account, and confirm that your file is now closed."

 

 

If the amount you paid is the larger sum, add this plus interest plus their charges without interest together, and ask for that.

 

Okay, EIE?

 

Regards

Liz

:)

Edited by Liz Southern
punctuation

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I sent a CCA request letter and £1 payment to Marshall ward. They cashed cheque and applied the £1 as a payment to my account.

 

They had no right to do that. The £1 was for no other purpose. You need to write and tell them that.

 

Received a letter dated 19 June saying they were "looking into my complaint." On 13th July I wrote to them and sent the time up letter and informing them account is now in dispute. I then received a letter on 21st July stating "Thank you for your letterof 13.07.09 concerning your complaint in relation to your signed credit agreement. Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused you." Then goes on to say they will be in contact once a full investigation of my concerns has been made.

 

Did you write the word "complaint" in your letter? If you did you have to wait for them to reply to your complaint. If you didn't, and it was purely a CCA request then look at my reply to Enoughisenough above, and do the same.

 

Since then I have recieved yet another monthly statement. Just add up their charges plus 30% interest.

/quote]

Regards

Liz

Edited by Liz Southern
spacing

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Liz

 

I take your advice in good stead. However I'm puzzled and undecided what I want to achieve.

 

I've added up everything I paid into the account and it's actually colossal. Just shy of 20K rather than the 10K I stated yesterday. Even at statutory this comes to a whopping 28k and doesn't even include all the unlawful charges that have been levied.

 

if I divide 27.9% by 365 and put the resulting figure into the spreadsheet is that the correct way of doing it? If it is the figures are staggering. They are surely not going to just hand that over are they?

 

I originally did say I wanted 28 grand back but have baulked at that because other caggers have said that I might be entitled to ask for all the interest applied instead. Also isn't there a case that they could argue that I enjoyed use of the card and deduct all payments/usage out from the figure? Any idea of the lawfulness of such an argument. I mean the whole agreement is uneneforceable and I think common law seeks to put both parties back to where they were. Is this right?

 

I'm just trying to get this clear before I proceed. It's one thing having it written off. It's quite another ball park stiffing them for tens of thousands. (Nice thought though considering they don't give a stuff for ruining people's lives). They'd surely fight this all the way and the costs could be enormous. Are there any high court or Court of Appeal authorities on this?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I divide 27.9% by 365 and put the resulting figure into the spreadsheet is that the correct way of doing it? If it is the figures are staggering.

 

For example a couple of hundred quid paid 8 years ago amounts to a staggering 44K. This surely can't be right. I must be doing something wrong here.

 

Anyone got the formula or actual daily percentage rate for compound so I can put that in instead.?

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=Liz Southern;2335172

Hi Liz, Many thanks for the advice. In my last letter to them informing them account was in dispute I did state that the £1 was for no other purpose. At no point have I said to them I was making a complaint....

 

When I write back to them do I again state that account is in dispute & enclose copy of previous letter? This all gets very complicated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris

 

EIE, you're stepping outside the realms of CCA's there, so I'd suggest a new thread for your particular case where you can keep it altogether

 

Fair point. I'll do this later.

 

Cheers.

Keep the faith. EiE.

 

Capstone Mortgage 'Services' - Sub-prime garbage - unlawful behaviour/MULTIPLE consumer abuse, TOTALLY in Defiance of REGULATIONS and the law

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/gmac_rfc.pdf

 

CONTACT CIB Here

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/Complaintformcib.Htm

 

Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

 

Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia) 02920 380 643

 

Mark Youde(accounts compliance) 02920 380 955

 

Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

Jeremy Pilcher 0207 637 6231

 

NO KAGGA LEFT BEHIND...

 

"We would not seek a battle, as we are; Nor, as we are, we say we will not shun it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Liz

 

I'm puzzled and undecided what I want to achieve.

 

Then let me decide for you!! ha ha. MONEY!! Your own back!!!

 

I've added up everything I paid into the account and it's actually colossal. Just shy of 20K rather than the 10K I stated yesterday. Even at statutory (Forget statutory.) this comes to a whopping 28k and doesn't even include all the unlawful charges that have been levied. And why is "colossal" a problem? The agreement is unenforceable and they've had your money. Don't you want it back?

 

if I divide 27.9% by 365 and put the resulting figure into the spreadsheet is that the correct way of doing it? Your columns are, amount of payment, date made, interest rate, today's date (updateable). You obviously need to multiply your daily rate by the number of days you are owed each payment amount.

 

If it is the figures are staggering. They are surely not going to just hand that over are they? It now becomes a question of compromise so you don't take them to court. They are now in the defensive position. Every time they sent you a default notice or telephoned you or wrote you a letter that was harassment. You have to believe that you are entitled to this. You state your figure, and they will settle on a lower figure, in agreement with you, but if you stick to your guns, they will settle!

 

Also isn't there a case that they could argue that I enjoyed use of the card and deduct all payments/usage out from the figure? Look at my comment above re a compromise settlement figure.

 

I mean the whole agreement is uneneforceable and I think common law seeks to put both parties back to where they were. Is this right? Forget common law. (Not often you will hear me say that.) And anyway, how can one party be put back to not having had the stress and harassment put upon them by another party? Defence: restitution. Financial settlement out-of-court.

 

It's one thing having it written off. As soon as it is unenforceable, the position is that the account/credit card/loan shouldn't have operated at all and they therefore shouldn't have taken your money.

 

stiffing them for tens of thousands. Stop thinking like this. You're still thinking like a victim. Start remembering all the nasty phone calls and letters and threats.

 

They'd surely fight this all the way. No, because you are going to make them see by negotiation that settling is going to be far less costly for them than attempting to defend a case through the courts.[/quote]

 

For those of you who I have told, I am so-oo enjoying my new job!!

 

Regards

Liz

PS And of course it's your decision, EIE - if I sound a bit bossy!:grin::grin::grin:

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=Liz Southern;2335172

When I write back to them do I enclose copy of previous letter? This all gets very complicated!

No, don't make things easier for them. You don't work for them. If they're confused that's their problem.

 

Regards

Liz

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU dont have to wor out anything.

 

Send this:

 

Account In Dispute

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: my request under s78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me dated **DATE**, the contents of which are noted. However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter, dated **DATE**. Upon receipt of the original request the specified account legally entered into disputed status.

 

My request remains outstanding. The supplied documentation does not constitute a true copy of a credit agreement and that which you sent doesn't even contain all the prescribed terms and is not 'properly executed'. The statements sent do not correspond to the amount stated in your earliest correspondence and therefore they do not satisfy the requirement to supply me with a statement of account.

 

As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until **12 days DATE** to provide me with the true copy I requested. After that date you entered into default of my request. Whilst the account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agencies (or any third party).

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. Any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

The time limits, which are laid down in the Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 are clear. You must supply an executed credit agreement within 12 working days of a proper CCA request. If you fail to comply with a legitimate request the account enters a default situation. . You entered into a default on **12 Days DATE**

 

Therefore you have 7 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint, otherwise your conduct will be reported to the Office of Fair Trading, the Financial Ombudsman and Trading Standards. Any investigation undertaken by them may affect your ability to hold a consumer credit license in the future.

 

Take further note that continued telephone calls after the receipt of a request not to call may constitute a criminal offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.

 

Communicate in writing and ONLY in writing, your telephone calls will NOT be answered.

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

So that's and opener.

 

EIE

 

You are not working out compound interest. It's simple interest. number of days owed x payment amount x interest rate.

Ok?

Regards

Liz

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOU dont have to wor out anything.

 

So that's and opener.

 

Hi Alisindebt,

 

This advice is for Onslowette, yes, not EIE whom you have quoted?

 

EIE's matter is at the tail end and he does need to work out the final amount he may or may not decide to chase.

 

Problem is, the thread is dealing with two caggers at the same time.

 

Regards

Liz:)

Oops, there goes another rubber tree plant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4984 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...