Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for taking your time and helping me on this. Would you recommend I also send a letter tomorrow to both BMW and Motonovo?
    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Visa debit card chargeback Nationwide refusing to help


DONYID
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

two orders where placed online with a firm who where based in china (the fact was well hidden and this was only discovered later on)

 

one was for £67.33

 

and the other £72.34

 

(i have added a scanned letter from the bank to the topic)

 

both orders arrived safe enough but right away i noticed the items where just not right they looked nothing like the genuine items i had already owned

 

so i took them to trading standards and also choice store who confirmed after time that they where in fact counterfeit

 

trading standards went as far as saying i couldn't send them back for a refund and sending counterfeit goods int he post was illegal

 

so i contacted nationwide who stated i need to fill out a visa dispute form and provide proof of order and receipts etc

 

which i did, i today get a letter saying they wont be able to do much about it the letter attached to this topic explains it better then i can

 

do i just drop it or can i take it further

 

 

scan1110220001.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange that method usually works

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing as it has been agreed that the goods are counterfeit, I think I would be writing back to Nationwide saying that their suggestion that the goods have been delivered are laughable as it is 'not' the goods you ordered or paid for and you consider that what they are saying is tantamount to assisting in a fraud.

 

According to Visa:

 

Shop safely online

 

 

Online shopping is as safe as the high street and it’s reassuring to know:

  • If you’re the victim of online fraud
  • If your order is not delivered
  • If you receive the wrong item
  • If your order is delivered damaged
  • If your travel company or airline goes under before your trip or whilst you are away

AND you have paid with your Visa card, you can get your money back (subject to your bank’s terms and conditions).

 

You could also contact Visa Europe and ask their advice, it is them who run the chargeback scheme.

 

E-mail: enquiries.europe@visa.com

Tel: +44 (0)20 7795 5777 (enquiries)

Tel: +44 (0)20 7937 8111 (switchboard)

 

I've also changed the heading to reflect the banks name so it is found in searches. If you want it changed back, please say so.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't actually advise using the phone at all. At this moment in time you have lost you money, so have the time to put everything in black and white.

 

If you must use the telephone, get yourself a telephone conversation recorder so that you can keep a full record of what is said. You do not have to tell the party on the other end that you are recording them.

I would also follow it up with a letter, preferably by recorded delivery.

 

I know we aren't talking a fortune, we also aren't talking pennies either, so follow this through to the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, i will write if that is the better option i am just on the phone to visa now and they are being funny with stating they are a USA based company and so help for UK complaints will be handled via email yet cannot explain why the number is for visa Europe and has a UK London based number yet they will only deal with USA based inquiries on the phone, it must just be one of those days today

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing as it has been agreed that the goods are counterfeit, I think I would be writing back to Nationwide saying that their suggestion that the goods have been delivered are laughable as it is 'not' the goods you ordered or paid for and you consider that what they are saying is tantamount to assisting in a fraud.

 

According to Visa:

 

 

 

Shop safely online

 

 

Online shopping is as safe as the high street and it’s reassuring to know:

  • If you’re the victim of online fraud
  • If your order is not delivered
  • If you receive the wrong item
  • If your order is delivered damaged
  • If your travel company or airline goes under before your trip or whilst you are away

AND you have paid with your Visa card, you can get your money back (subject to your bank’s terms and conditions).

 

You could also contact Visa Europe and ask their advice, it is them who run the chargeback scheme.

 

E-mail: enquiries.europe@visa.com

Tel: +44 (0)20 7795 5777 (enquiries)

Tel: +44 (0)20 7937 8111 (switchboard)

 

I've also changed the heading to reflect the banks name so it is found in searches. If you want it changed back, please say so.

 

Look at Fraud act 2006 section 2 & 3

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have also got a letter of confirmation from trading standards that you can included

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

little update i was in branch today for other reasons and spoke to a lady on the desk. stating how i was treated etc, a sit down with the manager where i pointed out what i had been told on here, and a call to department on my behalf and surprise surprise they are now starting a chargeback and if that fails they are going to pass it on to the fraud department to put in a claim, thank you guys SOOOO much is there a donations link for this site as id like to say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...