Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Insurances had incorrect data that was provided????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4589 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya, I am after opinions on what I have found out after trying to renew my partner's car insurance with a well known insurance company. I have posted this on another forum but with little response so was hoping for some views / opinions.

 

We've had car and home insurance with this company for up to 10 yrs with no claims to date.

 

Every year we renew it, go over details etc make sure all correct and last year the renewal went up considerably which they said was due to a speeding S30 fine in Oct 08. No problems, we accepted it (painfully but then it was his fault!).

 

This year after comparing online again, I tried to get them to price match the internet quote as the moneysavingsupermarket page kept coming up with error messages for all deals so I thought I'd ring the insurance company instead even though I'd lose the car wash offer...

 

After 1hr and a half of them faffing about they then mentioned that the S30 conviction was not on previous policies at all or the renewal on their systems and that this would now add a further additional amount to the new poilcy which was about £60 different to the renewal they sent out last week.

 

What we are trying to find out is why was the speeding conviction not on the policy despite the fact that we did inform them, on the day we received the speeding ticket and also when last years premium was increased they said it was due to the conviction. We know this for definate as I huffed about it at the time(not to them though) but as I said earlier he was speeding so will have to pay the price for it. Ironically his proffession is as a driver and this is the only speeding ticket he has received in 10 yrs.

 

The call centre rep said it was definately NOT on there or has ever been so does that mean that since Oct 09 all of our policies were void? ie - What would have happened if we made a claim?

 

They said they would usually honour it but my partner's experience of working in insurance as underwriter for 10 years says it would be unlikely they would pay up if could get out of it so basically we have paid for insurance that would never had paid up since Oct 08!

 

One thing is we should have checked the paperwork. We have now and there is no where on there that would show the conviction and all other data is correct. I asked the question where would it show and they said it probably wouldn't have.

 

Incidentally we are not after compensation, we just want to find out how this happened and would the company of definately paid out had we made a claim since Oct 08.

I have kept all of the quotes plus the one they used to price match last year which clearly shows we declared the conviction.

 

Any opinions on what to do now? What would you do?

Most importantly is are there any known examples of where a claim has not been paid out due to undisclosed speeding convictions? Any help would be greatfully received. I'm not happy to just drop this until I am sure!

Direct Auto Finance & DLC dispute ongoing.

Offer with confidentually agreement from DLC / DAF DECLINED :D

Please PM me if you have any cheap rate or 0800 number for DCA's to add to my list and also to my website

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO a S30 speeding fine would not increase premiums! however not notifying the insurance company may invalidate the insurance, no hard and fast rules here.

As its in the past,why worry about it, they know now and its a new policy, so you can compare on a level playing field.

Insurance in general has gone up considerably in the past few months so we are all suffering from the large claims that have been put in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...