Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with schedule of loss


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am making an ET claim and have been instructed to submit a schedule of loss by Monday 3rd October. The case is for unfair/wrongful dismissal and according to the judge at the pre-hearing, there's also a strong element of discrimination. I have been asked to prepare the schedule of loss to cover these. I was earning £21,000pa and was entitled to at least 1 week's notice pay which was not given. I was dismissed in March 2010 and didn't get another employment till 4 months later. The job paid me a lot less than my previous employment so I had continued to look for another job and never really got anything permanent. Just a few hours a week and up till date, I'm still looking for a job. How do I calculate my schedule of loss to incorporate all that. How do I also calculate the feelings part for the discrimination? What documents would I need to tender in support of my loss claim?

 

PLEASE I NEED URGENT HELP!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know exactly where you are coming from - I had this problem last week. First - dont panic, I know it sounds stupid but you will tend to make mistakes if your uptight. OK, the advice I have been given is - break it down. First work out what your weekly pay was and show how it was worked out i.e. 30k divided by 52 weeks... Work out how many weeks you were unemployed and state that amount (remember to also add up the unemployment amounts you received as you can take this off at the end as mitigated losses, will help!) right so now work out how much less you earnt per week since you found work... add this up So you should have something like 8wks @ 350.00 12wks @ 100.00 - if you earnt 100.00 less per week in your new job. Just continue like this til you get to today. You're right the difficult bit is the feelings etc... Do you have evidence of the discrimination? Are your career prospects compromised because of the dismissal? obviously there is the impact on your work record... How long had you worked there? How much notice should you have received - what was in your contract? all these things can be claimed. Ill see if I can dig out the blog on 'feelings' i read and will post it when i find it. Hope that helps a bit. Im sure someone more qualified to help will respond soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Skaatiii. Yes I have evidence of this discrimination which was already established by the tribunal judge at the prehearing. It actually affected my zeal and willingness to search for similar employment because it made me feel unqualified for such jobs. So I would say it affected my career prospects. Because I wasn't even given a contract, I had to revert to the statutory provision which is 1 weeks pay in lieu of notice. That also wasnt given. Do you know if I need to provide any more documents apart from evidence to show I was actually actively seeking employment? It's quite daunting because I'm representing myself as I cannot even afford a legal representative. Your reply has been helpful. I hope you can also help with the feelings bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Im in the same position i.e. self representing. At this stage for the schedule of loss - you simply need to evidence what you are claiming. i.e. if you were earning x per week provide a payslip - claiming unemployment - a copy of the award notice. etc... How long had you worked there? How has the other party justified not having given you a contract? still looking for that 'feeling' blog ss....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Injury to Feelings are divided into 3 elements of seriousness. Look up the case of Vento and the criteria to see where you fit in to them.

 

Then ask for the amount in the next element above where to think you may get. The judge will either agree or apportion the ITF where he thinks fit in any event. Ask also for the figure to account for inflation from when the guidelines were written.

 

Is there an element of Personal Injury eg depression anxiety or the like? You may need a medical report to ensure that the condition is evidenced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Papasmurf :D The Vento case was what I was trying to find.

 

If you google it theres a great deal of information online to view. Gives you a good idea of the 'value' of injury to feelings. Hope thats helpful.

 

PS sorry for the late reply - I got sidetracked adding more info to my paperwork! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks papasmurf1cx for that. I have googled the vento case and I think I can work around it. I don't really have any medical evidence to support any adverse effect though but it did affect me a lot.

skaatiii Thanks too. No your reply is not late. I have till Monday to do the calculations. I also heard that the loss of earnings should be calculated based on net pay. so does that means i work out the weekly amounts based on net annual pay right?

Thanks a lot both of you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in your schedule of loss, don't forget to include any holiday time you would have accrued had you still been empoyed (if applicable) as well as the monetary value of any other benefits you may have had.

 

When I did my schedule, I went from permie to contract work, so calculated in the difference in pay (because I earned less as a contractor than a permie), plus the cost of my umbrella company, as well as employer's NI contributions as I had to pay those as well (since I was a contractor). I wouldn't have had to pay either if I was still permie and in employment with the company.

 

It's up to the tribunal as to what you get and what you won't, and as long as you have evidence of the breakdown of your costs, you should be ok I think.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...