Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange Mobile Default With No Proof


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4632 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have just checked my credit file for the first time and saw a default on it from Orange mobile.

 

To cut a long story short, it was signed up through an independent dealer with no signed contract, proof of address, or proof of ID. Orange don't know that there is no proof, but I can assure you that there isn't.

 

Also, even if there were proofs, the independent dealer went into liquidation about a year ago.

 

My question is this: Can I get the default removed by requesting them to prove it or remove it?

 

I have heard of this happening with certain bank charges or utility bills. I have requested over the phone that someone check this out for me but I either get hung up on or I get the "I'll send it to the team and they will get back to me" routine.

 

The contract was set up in 2004 and defaulted in June 2006.

 

Can anyone help me out here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, The only way to have the default

removed will be to complain to Orange

and state clearly what the circumstance

are.

The CRAs cannot remove or amend enties

without authorisation from the creditor who

place the entry.

It would I believe be a little unwise to

rely on Orange having no ''proof'' as

clearly an account existed, even if this

was an electronic signature it could be

enforceable.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Account set-up in 2004 and defaulted in 2006?. Even Dec 2004 to June 2006 leaves 18 months ... how were these 18 months paid for?.

You might have a hard time in claiming that the account wasn't yours if payments were made from an account unique to yourself.....

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmmm, Sounds odd I agree,

For Orange to have accepted and

opened an account there must have

been some checking.

The fact the retailer has liquidated

IMHO has no bearing on the account

with Orange.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response guys.

 

The situation in 2004 was that to set up an account you needed the two proofs of ID and the signed contract. An independent dealer would call Orange and tell them that they have these and give all the relevant info.

 

If a customer does not pay then Orange go back to the dealer and get the documents. If the company doesn't have these or is missing some then Orange charge the company. I am sure that things have updated now and it will be a lot more secure, but in 2004 this was not the case. A lot of dealers would "take the risk" on someone, for example if they only had a passport but no proof of address, they would connect them up if they thought that they would pay the bill and therefore never need to send the ID to Orange.

 

So the point I am making is that they didn't have any of the required ID or signed contract with me. I was always under the impression that if it was a bank or loan then they would need the required ID or paperwork to show on request or they would have to remove any defaults.

 

No contract... no debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response guys.

 

The situation in 2004 was that to set up an account you needed the two proofs of ID and the signed contract. An independent dealer would call Orange and tell them that they have these and give all the relevant info.

 

If a customer does not pay then Orange go back to the dealer and get the documents. If the company doesn't have these or is missing some then Orange charge the company. I am sure that things have updated now and it will be a lot more secure, but in 2004 this was not the case. A lot of dealers would "take the risk" on someone, for example if they only had a passport but no proof of address, they would connect them up if they thought that they would pay the bill and therefore never need to send the ID to Orange.

 

So the point I am making is that they didn't have any of the required ID or signed contract with me. I was always under the impression that if it was a bank or loan then they would need the required ID or paperwork to show on request or they would have to remove any defaults.

 

No contract... no debt?

 

No contract in existence, no debt, but if they can show the was a contract, even if they don't have documentation ; contract shown to exist, debt (potentially) owed.

Again - were there any payments from 2004 to June 2006, and can they show these were from you?.

If so, and they sent you bills and you paid them, they can show there was a contract, and it was with you, unless you can prove otherwise.

 

Edited to add : I doubt that they need the paperwork to the extent that they might for a bank or a loan where the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act apply. If they chase you for the debt, it won't be as if it were a loan or credit card, but non-payment of a bill for a service provided under a contract. Thus they'd only have to show (to the civil standard of proof) that the contract existed, they supplied the service, and you hadn't paid and had no valid reason not to pay.

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the response everyone.

 

They have allready agreed that they require the proof of address, proof of signature, and signed contract for them to put the default on my file. They just won't check weather they have it or not.

 

The only response I can really get from them on the phone is that I should phone the police and report a fraud, which is a road I don't want to go down.

 

I just want them to look for the documents and realise that they don't have them. I might just forget calling them and just send them the request in the snail mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will have to do a subject access request (SAR) to Orange

for the to [provide the information you require.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...