Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO services help please


bulldozaba
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4133 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have removed your attachments Bull. . .

 

Reload them again with your details removed....

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is what they sent me after i had sent the default letter. Also note what i have circled in the top right corner of the CCA, I take it this means they have another 7 pages but didn't bother to send them?

cca acc letter.pdf

cca.pdf

Edited by bulldozaba
with out details
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Gemma Roderick’s Facebook page –

 

http://www.facebook.com/people/Gemma-Roderick/669538344

 

– shows her as being in India. I do hope HFO aren’t processing your data in a foreign country... because that would be naughty.

 

friends with Priyabrata Ghosh, who works for Validor.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok attachments edited, what do i need to do in relation to the CCA request as they haven't sent my t&c's or statement and on the last letter its says collection activities are due to start again.

They are already charging me interest the amount has gone up by £12.18 between the two letters dated 27th Sept and 18th Oct. Im alittle confused as to what i need to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could write back to Gemma and point out that in fact they have not complied with your S.78 request, as she states in her letter, as they have failed to supply you with the Terms & Conditions or a statmenet of account.

 

I would even send them a copy of this pdf. and highlight the sections they have failed on. (Have attached it for you.) S.78 request requirements.pdf

 

The letter they have sent you is deliberatley misleading - and should be reprted to the OFT.

 

You may also like to ask Gemma how come she is claiming to be from HFO but actually works for Validor Capital, a company with no Consumer Credit Licennce for debt collection, and not registered under the data protection act to process your data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

' HFO Sercvices'? Cannot even spell either! Muppets!! Get this reported to OFT and stress the Validor link. Have you got the envelopes from the letters and the postmarks? Where were they posted??

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will write back to her, how do you know she works for this Validor company? did i miss something on the facebook page. i notice that it said worked at HFO and not works.

As for the letters i only have one envelope from them i think and it came from london SW19.

Which bit of S.78 request requirements.pdf do i need to copy hopefully not all 49 pages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just done a quick search on google, Validor capital and hfo services india have the exact same address just written slightly different.

HFO Services India Pvt. Ltd.,

6B,Building No.6, DLF Cyber City,

DLF Phase-3, Gurgaon-122002 DLF

Tel: 0124 420 5241

 

validor capital india pvt. ltd

6B building no 6

DLF Cyber City DLF phase III

Gurgaon-122002

Edited by bulldozaba
Link to post
Share on other sites

i will write back to her, how do you know she works for this Validor company? did i miss something on the facebook page. i notice that it said worked at HFO and not works.

As for the letters i only have one envelope from them i think and it came from london SW19.

Which bit of S.78 request requirements.pdf do i need to copy hopefully not all 49 pages.

 

Have a read through it - you will find a section on what they need to send to comply, just print off the relevant pages. Not forgetting the section on the statement of account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...