Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance secured loan harrassment & PPI reclaim


sonway
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4374 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

In 2001 we took out a secured loan on our home for 10,000. To cut a long story short we fell into financial difficulties and missed some payments, we were hounded day and night by these leeches. We contacted national debt line who advised us that a nuber of welcomes loans were unenforceable and could we send our agreement to them so their solicitor could look over it. It turned out that it was unenforceable but Welcome told us they would never remove the charge from our property untill we paid in full. In 2006 we remortgaged and offered welcome 5000 to remove the charge, they snatched our hand off. My question is should they have taken this 5000 to remove the charge? I have a copy of our credit file which states that they wrote off the loan before we paid the 5000. Is it worth starting a compliant with the FOS? Did they take this money from us illegally?

 

Thanks:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i sonway

dont want to be a damp squid, but no chance

the reaon they snatched your hand off is they know its a lousy agreement.

at the time you did not have to pay them any thing.

but at the end of the day, the debts exsists.

as the agreement was crap, the charge was not a problem to remove.

 

like most people, we did not know how to deal with things like this.

the likes of welcome walked all over us and we accepted it.

how times have now changed.

as long as you have no default just forget about it and put it down to experience

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi

 

We are currently in the process of sorting our debts out with the hope of becoming debt free fairly soon,

some of you will probably have read some of my recent posts relating to different DCA'S,

however, this one with Welcome is probably going to be the most complicated and any opinions/advice etc would be greatly appreciated.

 

We took out a loan with them in 2001,

we fell behind with this due to job loss.

 

To cut a long story very short the harassed us night and day,

called our family,

asked me to sell items in the house and jewellery to pay them each week,

they also knocked on our neighbours doors to ask where we were if we were out.

 

In the end we moved out of our home into rented accomodation as we could not stand the harassment anymore.

 

We then found out that our loan could infact be unenforceable and as it was we were able to move back to our home, which we did.

 

We did not pay Welcome another penny and recieved no further contact from them.

 

We then came to a point where we were able to re mortgage our property which we did,

but welcome wanted £5000 to take the charge of our property,

we paid this to get rid of them once and for all,

 

however i believe now that we should not have had to pay such a large sum of money to take the charge off.

 

I am thinking of doing a CCA request to them to try and claw some PPI etc back from them.

 

Is it worth it and can i still request a CCA even though the account is closed?

 

Any advice will be much appreciated as i feel that they are laughing due to the 5K that we paid to the robbers.:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much was the amount owing to

Welcome when the charge was placed??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry post ended and can't edit??

 

I think you would be better doing a Subject Access Request, so

that you get all the data including that on the charge,

the cost is £10.00 and they have 40 days to comply,

there is a template in the CAG library.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the default sum if it was more than 5K

you did well.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

we never recieved a defualt notice. I also have evidence of numerous charges added to the account, £20 to visit our home.

My question is, if the laon was unenforceable does it remain secured on a property, and should it have cost 5k to remove?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That 's why I believe you need the SAR as it is

not a matter for speculation you need hard facts,

so unless you have retained every bit of correspondence

regarding this both your and theirs you have I think

little chance of making a competent claim.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sonway, In my opinion if you try to

make a claim personally or through litigation

without having every bit of info from the charge

to the PPI and charges it will cost you time and money.

For ten quid you can know all that Welcome hold on

the account and what actions were taken.

Going in not fully prepared is unwise.

Your decision of course.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just didn't want to see you perhaps

fall at the first hurdle due to lack of

basic info on the dealings within Welcomes

dingy world:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they may moan that they only keep

records for 6 years which is bunk they have to keep

them for 6 years after the closure just tell the

to get on with it if they try anything an say you will inform the ICO.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the default sum if it was more than 5K

you did well.

just to let you know, never give up with welcome, i didnt and i got them to write of £5000 !!, just let them keep harrasing you then when you feel you have enough threten them for harrassment they will melt they did with me and wiped it off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then if its a closed account and the OP owes nowt to welcome

 

nice windfall coming!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's exactly why I want them to have

all the ammo to blow Welcomes WAGON:madgrin: out

of the water.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...