Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ESA50 submitted, ATOS said no WCA needed but do I have legal right to request one?


nebukhadnezzer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Further to my ESA50 submission I rec'd a letter from ATOS saying there is no need to attend a WCA. I have spoken to ATOS who told me they've sent their recommendation to the DWP. Ive spoken to the DWP and they know nothing as of yet.

 

My question is simple. If on the basis of the info they have rec'd from my GP etc can ATOS lawfully deny me the opportunity of a WCA? If the DWP Decision Maker turns me down without even attending a WCA is that lawful under ESA rules and can I lawfully request a WCA.

 

I'm getting quite suspicious about this. I suspect they've got a huge backlog and they're looking at so called weak cases and making a decision without a formal medical simply to save time and money. Is that lawful? If they do turn me down can I request a WCA and do they according to law have to grant me my request?

 

Many thanks, appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I expect Leemack will be along later to comment for you.

 

I could be wrong, but I think you're approaching this from the wrong angle. I don't think they can turn you down for benefit [which I think is what you're asking] without seeing you. They can though, and we've seen it, decide you can have ESA without seeing you. People here have had appointments cancelled when they were on the way there, from memory.

 

Did Atos say it was their medical adviser who looked at your information, or did someone at the DWP maybe? Maybe someone could advise if the DWP have in-house medical advisers?

 

In your last thread, it was suggested you contact the DWP. I think only they can make the decision, Atos is contracted to do the 'medical' assessments that used to be done at the DWP's own centres.

 

When did you last speak to the DWP please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB13

 

Sorry for being a pain

 

In the ATOS letter (dated 02/08/11) they stated that an ATOS 'medical advisor' had looked at my file and decided that I did not need to attend a medical even though one had been made for me (obviously they reversed the decision to bring me in for a WCA). They then said to expect a letter from my benefits office. I'm still waiting so I spoke to the DWP this morning who know nothing about this.

 

My concern is simple. Can they turn me down without a formal WCA and if they do turn me down for ESA do I have the legal right to demand one?

 

Very odd

 

Many thanks and apologies for being a PUTA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello. The answer is with the DWP. Until they tell you or write, you don't know what your problem is, if there is one. In your place, I would just keep chasing the DWP.

 

I know it's easy for me to say, but I think you're tying yourself up in knots over the legal right to a WCA. We spend most of our time advising people who want to get out of them, so I'd be surprised if what you're suggesting is the case. Please try not to worry and maybe leemack will be along later with thoughts for you.

 

Just to repeat my question though, have you rung the DWP recently?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've just rung me and told me ive been put in a 'special group' though i think she mean't the support group.

 

many thanks

 

will make a contribution when my upgraded ESA payments come through..it will only be a fiver or so cos that's all i can afford but you lot have been superb and i appreciate the time and effort

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just for continuity and piece of mind until you get the formal notification/award letters.

 

Once you have them in your hand (and they will tell you this) you will no longer be required to send in sick notes whilst you are in receipt ESA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no special group - they mean the support group. Though you are special in not needing a WCA.

 

No, once you're in the support group, you don't need to submit any med certs.

 

And for anyone who reads this thread who's wondering about a letter saying you don't need a WCA - this means that your ESA50 has been sufficient to find you not capable of work, and you will be put in the support group - though still send in med certs until the DWP have contacted you either by phone or in writing, as it takes time for the paperwork to get from ATOS to the DWP.

 

Atos have a financial incentive to do the WCA's, so the only reason you don't get one is if you automatically qualify. Most people automatically qualifying lately, appear to be those transferring from incap to ESA with well established, long term conditions - probably where a previous assessment has stated little chance of improvement. Though there are a few new ESA claimants who will bypass the WCA for other reasons.

Edited by leemack
Link to post
Share on other sites

how do i make a contribution to CAG?

 

thanks

 

Hi, If you 'hover' your cursor over the word contribution in your post above this, then click on the 'link' bottom right.

 

Many thanks for thinking about making a donation.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...