Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

debt advice from Fire financial investigations / cabot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4713 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I have another debt question I need your help with please.

 

We had an easyjet credit card with citibank back in 2007/08 what a load of rubbish it was too

( got points for spending to use against the flights then got charged loads of money to use the credit card booking them!) , what a con,

 

other half fell out of work and the debt on the card grew, he ignored it for ages

and now recently the debt went over to Fire from Cabot.

 

They sent us a letter stating make us a reasonable offer the debt they say is £3592.11.

 

As we are not in a strong position to pay a lump sum at present we replied we could only pay £500 as final payment as they needed to money paid within a couple of weeks.

 

They replied saying they would accept £2100 if we paid by end of June.

 

We emailed back twice asking if they could reduce it further as there is no way we could get hold of this amount of money as we are having financial difficulties and thinking of going bancrupt but they failed to reply.

 

We did not disclose our telephone number and they are sending these letters to our old address. we could possibly afford to pay around £1000 in a lump sum and pay with a credit card but that would be our limit to the max.

 

This is showing up on his credit rating as a default along with one other defaulted account which we are trying to clear too,

we want to get his rating back from poor by trying to clear these debts . Please advise us what we should do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to burst your bubble, but it will take at least 6 years to get your credit rating back to 'excellent'. Once you have defaults on your files they stay there for 6 years, whether you pay up, settle up whatever, and even if they are so marked, they would count against you until they dissapear. Even if you make it a condition of your F & F offer of £1000 that the default is removed, I doubt very much if they would agree.

 

You really do not need to put yourself in more debt with another credit card by trying to make an F & F.

 

I would suggest sending a CCA request for this current card, and, as said above, it may prove that they do not have an enforceable agreement.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...request-letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep as advised..

 

any one offering a discount is trying to fleece you on a debt you do not have to pay.

 

it'll either be all mostly unlawfull charges and/or PPI that you could reclaim

or

there are issues with the paperwork

 

i would think the former in this case.

 

sta off the phone

do not ever speak to DCA's on the phone ever!

 

you dont owe this

so best bet is to ignore them now

 

they'll go nowhere near court & they know it.

 

as for the 'defaults'

 

they will fall off 6yrs from YOUR last financial transaction on whatever cards.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a simple point but a very pertinent one please don't use another

card to pay the debt, this becomes a very vicious circle,even the OFT warns against it.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, printed out the CCA letter ready to send but not sure what address to send it to as it needs to be send recorded delivery and the current debt is with FIre Investigation and Recoveries who only give a P O Box any ideas what address I should use please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

RD's to Box numbers are usually signed for in bulk.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

guess what ,sent the letter recorded delivery yesterday and today Cabot (not fire) have replied to my email they have ignored since the 14th June, saying they have spoke to the underwriters and are willing to take a f & f payment of £1500 so its gone down another £600 from the last f & f amount given which they said have to be paid by 3oth June. Should I still wait now for the response from the letter and ignore them for several days like they did to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waite these idiots are always behind in reponse and never check what post has reached them before pressing the button

to print more C**p.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are offering a discount something is wrong

 

they cannot go to court with it

 

ignore them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I have now recieved a letter from Cabot Financial, infact this is the 2nd the first was just to acknowledge my letter and request for information and return the £1 postal order. Buth this is how the 2nd letter goes:

 

YOUR REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974

 

We write further to your request for information under sections 77 and/or78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Although Cabot has requested the information, the original lender is experiencing a delay in retrieving the information form its archives. Although Cabot has not been able to provide you with the information within the prescribed period, we would still advise that your debt remains legally due.

 

We are still able to report to the Credit Reference Bureaux regarding the status of your debt and we would recommend you continue your repayment plan with us or alternatively you contact us to make payments towards your account if you do not have a repayment plan aranged.

 

Thank you for your co-operation and patience in this matter.

 

 

What do I do now folks ????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

As to the suggesting use of a credit card to clear

this debt OFT Guidance states:

Section 2.6 (b)

It is unfair pressuring debtors to sell property to raise funds,

To raise funds by further borrowing, or to extend their borrowing, if they

have suggested that, were you thinking on those lines?

 

Might be worth mentioning:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they have not suggested he makes a payment via a credit card , It was my idea just to get this paid off once and for all as we want to get a mortgage in OH name soon, but as the default stays on the account until the end of the 6 years whether paid or not I doubt he will be able to get one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see that it would clear the debt, but it may not

get the default removed as they should stay on credit

reports for 6 years.

 

Also using all you available balance on the credit

card could lead you into problems should

you have difficulties in the future, ( OH heck I sound like a debt councellor which I'm not):madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...