Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Few issues with thompson. complaint letter needs a once over please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4711 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can somebody please give me advice on this letter, does it make sence?

 

 

Booking Ref – *****

 

Dear Sir / Madam,

 

We have just returned from our holiday to Puerto aventuras, Mexico. This is the only holiday we have been able to go on due to my partner looking after her ill mother since May 09 which was also to the same hotel booked through Thompson. We had a fantastic stay again and the hotel is excellent as it was last time, although we have a few issues that need addressing.

 

Firstly we booked 2 excursions through our Thompson rep C*****, one was to the ancient ruins of Coba and other was to Snorkel with whale sharks a long life ambition of both mine and my partners. The excursion to Coba was very good however the whale shark excursion was terrible. C**** told us before booking that it would be a max number of 10 people on the boat and that only 2 people with a guide would be allowed into the water at any one time – Which is law, set out by the Mexican government. We were also told that lunch was provided as well as drinks and that we would be giving the option to snorkel for as long as we had energy, as the whale sharks swim very fast its difficult to keep up with them. With all this in mind we paid $210 each for the trip totalling $420.

We were picked up at 0620 on the day of the trip and travelled up to the Cancun were we were given life jackets and met the crew. 9 people boarded our speed boat where we waited for half hour in the baking sun for 2 extra people to turn up, so that made 11 customers on board. Then we set off only travelling for 10 mins down the coast where again we pulled in and waited for 45 mins in the hot sun for 2 more people this now totalling 13 customers and 3 staff. The boats are only small and these meant conditions on board were cramped and uncomfortable. We finally set off to our destination after being delayed for 75 minutes. Once there we located 1 whale shark and was told to get ready which we did, however this was difficult due to the number of people on board. Once ready were told that we were to go in groups of 3?? For myself and partner were paired up with a very nervous Asian lady. We sat on the side of the boat and ready and when the captain said go we went the first time the Asian lady landed on my partner which prevented us seeing the whale shark as by the time my partner sorted her self out it had swam by us, the second time the Asian lady swam across me kicking my mask clean off my face. This were the on two times were able to get in the water. We saw the whale shark for at most 10 seconds. Lunch was provided on board which conceded off 1 can of coke and a small plastic tub of prawns. Then we returned back to Cancun for our drive back to the hotel we arrived back at the hotel at 18.30.

We feel that this trip was not up to the usual standard of Thompson excursions and that not only was it miss sold to us it also broke the Mexican laws that the tour operators must abide to when running whale shark trips.

We have provided photographic evidence to the dive shop we use in Puerto aventuras of what we witnessed in regard to the laws broken and the owner is taking this up with the authorities in Mexico.

 

Secondly we, both as qualified scuba divers prefer to take our own diving equipment abroad when planning any scuba diving and always travel with Thompson due to the fact that they allow us to carry extra weight for diving equipment, 5kg per person on production of cert card. We always carry our cert card inside our passport holders for ease, as when checking in the desk clerk has the required information at hand

On the outward flight to Mexico we checked in 3 bags one each for personal items and one for diving equipment. We were checked in fine, however at Cancun airport for the return journey the desk clerk charged us excessive baggage allowance for our diving equipment which was 8kg charged at £15 per kg plus a charge for paying by credit card.

We tried to explain to the clerk that we were allowed this as part of our allowance and even opened the bag to show her that it was diving equipment inside. She spoke very little English and said it needed to be in out personal cases and not in an extra case.

My partner rang Thompson customer services before we travelled to make sure we were still eligible for the extra weight and we were told yes, but it had to be packed separately which it was, and we had no issues on the outward bound part of our flight.

 

Lastly, on arrival at east midland airport we collected our cases and mine had a large tear across the bottom of the case, I approached the lost and damaged desk where I was told the desk is not yet open! However the lady said she would try and fill in the necessary paperwork which she did, however she said it was hardly anything and in future I should buy cheap luggage as there easy to just use and then throw away as they always get damaged anyway, she then proceeded to tell me how her case got damaged from a return flight from Egypt and she just went to Primark and purchased a new 1. This comment I feel is totally unacceptable and frankly shocking. Damage is damage regardless of how much it was originally purchased for.

 

We feel very let down with parts of the service we received during the two weeks holiday booked with Thompson for the reason mentioned above. We don’t normally complain and that while we do realise that mistakes and things do happen these points are not expectable and need addressing. We have seeked advice today and we request we be refunded for the trip and excessive baggage charge for diving equipment in full this to include the charges paid for using the credit card.

We will also be forwarding this letter to our credit card company along with photo copies of all attachments present.

 

We request a reply within 7 working days from the date of this letter before taking matters further.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

I am also going to include all reciepts well photocopys along with this letter

 

thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do not get the reply you want, write again but you need to cut your letter right down to bare facts, what you expected and paid for and what you got. Bullet points, clear and concise.

 

Take out all the superfluous text about partners mother being ill, the lady being Asian (what relevence is her race any way?), what the lady at the lost and damaged desk said to you.

 

Did you do a report with your rep in resort? Did you complain to a rep in the airport about the charge for excess baggage?

 

Don't expect a reply in 7 days. Tour Ops have 28 or 35 days to reply (I can't remember which).

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...