Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital One Default removal request(Progress so far)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Prior to going to FOS you must exhaust the complaints procedures of the OC and DCA's,

the FOS will be more favourable if you have tried to resolve the dispute beforehand as that

is their purpose as final arbiter.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs anything to get one over on the bully boy institutions

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

The final response letter from the creditor is a very important item as in the simplest of terms you are

appealing the unreasonableness of that response in your opinion.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The final response letter from the creditor is a very important item as in the simplest of terms you are

appealing the unreasonableness of that response in your opinion.

 

Hi Brigadier, your right on the letter they are saying this is their final response. Do I complain to them or do I need to go to th FOS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No straight to FOS now, complaint form is on their web site!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and if it does go to the FOS which it more than likely will then ask for the default entry to be removed as part of the complaint due to the grounds i stated above

 

darn good advice there. excatly what I did when I went to the FOS about HSBC and as part of the adjudication the default was removed.

don't ask, don't get.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Just had another letter from Cap1 with the following response:

 

To confirm your previous account ending in 0621 went into default on 12 Jan 2007 for £460.69. You have since made the payment which has bought your balance to zero and we have recorded a settled default on your credit file.

 

As you will be aware, where there is no sum which is, or will, or may become payable under the credit agreement, then the obligation to provide documentation under section 78 of the CCA does not apply. Therefore, on the basis of the above, we have no obligation to provide you with a copy of the documents that you have requested.

 

I am baffled how the above response was given for the question asked below:

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number:

2. You must supply me with a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

3. Any deed of assignment if the debt was sold on

I have now sent my complainant of to the FOC; but feel this is not going to get e very far because the basis of my complaint is noncompliance to the CCA request. I have also mention that I requested a statement of my account(as per request above) to reclaim penalty charges all of which they have not responded.

Just as a further observation, they have entered the wrong account number on the default, I have informed the FOC of this point also. I was wondering now I have received CAP1 final response re this matter, does this apply if I write to claim charges on this account? As I've been unable to get CAP1 to supply a statement of account, I can only claim for the £160.00 that is showing over my £300.00 credit limit. :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid their statement is correct account is settled and the contract/agreement is null and void.

How successful the FOS complaint will be is much a lottery depending on the adjudicator.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make your complaint soley about the charges, whether the agreement has ended or not you are entitled to reclaim.

 

Reclaiming the charges, will then leave the balance of the default notice to be incorrect. it is not a case of just adjusting it, a new notice would have to be issued and as they have kindly pointed out, there is no agreement to issue one on.

 

Therefore due to information on your credit file having to be correct under the data protection act it will have to come off.

 

You need to state all this in your complaint. As you have sent it give them a ring in a few days saying that complaint is now irrelevant and can they ignore it, then simply do another.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR costs £10 send unsigned postal order they have 40 days to reply, have a look at the templates in the CAG library

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the SAR may well give you more to go on,and you may be able to get

a final response letter from them, which is good as it shows FOS you have made

every effort to resolve the matter.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Are you saying they stated they will not be dealing with a SAR Request?

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest load of tosh i have heard.

 

You need to send them a further letter informing them they cannot choose not to act on a Subject Access Request as it is your right under the Data Protection Act.

 

Inform them if they fail to comply then you will take legal action against them for the breach.

 

Taken from ICO Website:

 

What orders can the court make?

If a court is satisfied that an organisation has not dealt with a subject access request in line with the Act, the court can order them to comply. The court also has the power to award compensation.

 

Furthermore inform them that their 40 days started from when they received the original request!

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry peeps I've been at the idiot pills, just read the letter again from Captial One and their response is in relation to a previous "Chase up" letter I sent them and not my SAR request. Just being send so many letter I have got a little confused.:oops: my bad. I await their response to the SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All, Just received my SAR which made very interesting reading. Charges amount to £390.00 on a £300.00 credit limit, they must of seen me coming! FOS dealing with charges and refund; but I don't think they will deal with the incorrect amount entered on my credit report. What I have noticed from the SAR is that the default was entered on the 12/01/2007 for £460.00; then on the 14/02/2007 I made a payment of £368.55 which cleared the balance. £92.14 is listed as MISC OTHER FEE REFUND. So does this make the default amount incorrect by their own admission? I was going to send all information to the ICO and the CRA's to once again ask for this entry to be deleted, feeling wery now!

 

Thanks

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taht looks like a good result charges refunded balance zero.

 

You can write to the CRA and ask for the default to be removed, they will contact the creditor

for you to get leave to remove it, they may or may not agree.

 

Brig.:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...