Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4742 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

I have posted a few posts looking info. but in between repleys i have been looking at posts on TUPE law.

 

the story is 5 years ago july 2006 the company i was with was bought over along with another company

they were formed into a new company. Now looking at TUPE law my job title & contract of employment, terms and conditions move with me. Now every time i ask the company anything they always say im on a different contract.

 

It says they should change my terms and conditions with in 2 months in writing. It is now may 2011 and i have only now been offered a new contract & terms and conditions. I was never offered a new contract which forms part off my other grievance.

 

so what i'm really asking is can they say now that my old contract is invalid and i have been under there terms and conditions with out them giving them to me or offering me a new contract before now?

 

Also they say all terms and conditions are the same is that true ?

 

Are do they have to give them to me? As my old company never had a booklet?

 

many thanks

michael2004

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any objections should have been made prior to the take over

 

when you are tuped, you enter a consultation period and when the two companies merge a method of harmonization takes place to unite both companies into one. This takes about 18 months to two years.

 

in what way are you on less t&c then before

the problem you now face is as its been so long

 

custom and practice kicks in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any objections should have been made prior to the take over

 

when you are tuped, you enter a consultation period and when the two companies merge a method of harmonization takes place to unite both companies into one. This takes about 18 months to two years.

 

in what way are you on less t&c then before

the problem you now face is as its been so long

 

custom and practice kicks in

 

custom and practice kicks in yes if i was argueing i was say doing something different which then becomes work in practice but i am not doing anything different than before we were TUPE over the company have kept telling me i am under a different contract. so can they use there terms and conditions or use my old ones it is only now they trying to hold a disciplinary under there terms and conditions but when it comes to holidays job title working hours im under a different contract. that can't be legal can it?

 

 

Also one other thing i am the only person still under the old contract were everyone else has or on the new contract. when i was offered the new contract i was not happy with the changes so was in negotiation with them which broke down so i was taking redundancy as couldn't agree with the changes.

 

you say i should have objected before the take over how can i object when i have only found out that the contract and terms will be different than my old ones.?

which demotes me from what i was changes my works hours don't pay overtime have to work weekends and so on im sure they have to be different terms and conditions which no one would agree to so i hope they cant say work in practice.?

 

as for lest t&c well we all have are stranded T&C but then companys add there own T&C in a booklet but one company's alleged ofence might not be an alleged ofence under the old T&C.

 

EXAMPLE : one company pays some of there employee's cash, the other company says it's a gross misconduct ?

Edited by michael2004
Link to post
Share on other sites

but when it comes to holidays job title working hours im under a different contract. that can't be legal can it?

 

YOU ARE CORRECT

 

THERE IS ONLY ONE CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT

 

THAT WOULD BE THE COMPANY YOU TUPED OVER, THAT GOES FOR ALL T&C

 

YOU SAY YOU OBJECTED AND WERE IN TALKS OF REDUNDENCY WHICH IS CORECT, YOU CAN

 

accept the changes

work under protest

accept redundency

 

you chose the redundency package

 

what happened to that negotiation and why are you still employed

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing in TUPE which says that your contract HAS to change, but over time, there may have been subtle changes, which if not contested, could easily have become part of a 'new' contract. There is also no specific length of time after which TUPE ceases to apply, however after almost five years it is likely that the 'new' employer would not be bound by it's terms.

 

What parts of your contract are they looking to change. I think we could do with a bit more detail.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the problem is i was employed as an Area Manager which i told i was still doing in the new company as nothing had changed ie i was doing nothin g different.

they then decided they needed only one Area Manager which they give her a pay rise. They offered me a contract which demoted me to an Assit Manager and offered me an 18p payrise (an hour). I later found out with the other Assit Managers that were offered the same contract as they offered me they offered them more than 18p. well as u could guess i wasn't happy so put in for redundancy. I just wanted out of the place.

 

The problem now arises over they now trying do discipline me with a gross misconduct which everyone knows what they up to (don't want to pay me the money). That's were im arguing over my T&C as in my contracts t&c i can't see it been an offense that they have alleged i have committed.In the disciplinary hearing they agreed i am under a different contract so should be dealt with under my T&C and wanted to carry on with the hearing i objected as i knew they would have dismissed me (NO WAGES) so at the minute im still on full pay. they said all T&C are the same i told them how do they do that as it's not a standard t&c

 

The charge is i paid cash to an employee for work. now some places pay there employees cash so as i say they all can't be the same. infact it was paid thou another employees wages with her agreement which the company knows as they have/can check the payment for the job. But as i say they trying to get out of paying my redundancy.Now one of the problems i have is the person has left the company that had the money paid in to her account ( it's the nature of the job im in cleaning)

 

any help would be gratefully

 

michael2004

Link to post
Share on other sites

just an update.

 

after seeking legal advice i was told that the company can do what they want. but it don't make it legal and leaves them open for an unfair dismissal case. which don't help them is they give me the t&c 5 minutes before the disciplinary hearing. As there is no time limit on TUPE if company keeps u on your old contract then u still under them terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...