Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to clear Credit Report after fraud on MBNA card they wont admit to.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey All,

 

Firstly people on this board have been so helpfull in the past - just want to say a very BIG THANK YOU all for all your great help.

 

Not sure if this is the right place for this post - if not can the MODS please re-locate it - thanks

 

A bit of history - I held a MBNA/Virgin card since 2000 and had never defaulted or otherwise (apart from the odd late payment), until 2007 - when I was advised by MBNA that all of a sudden I had a debt of about £9000. A fraud had occurred on my card (which had not been used for five months). The debt created must be now in access of £10000 (with all the interest they piled on) - of which £7000 being drawn in one transaction at about 9pm from a chip and pin machine (of which MBNA had all the details and a (EDIT)er told me that "...it was not MBNA's job to recovere the money - or investigate as to where it was transferred to..."). Also, a business rates bill being paid over the counter to Hounslow Council. Address changed twice within three days - and new cards and pin ordered to both new addresses. All this confirmed by MBNA. Anyway - to cut a long story short - the Financial Ombudsman are a right bunch of a who are basically in the banks pockets - so they did (EDIT). Numerous letters to MBNA (all recorded) have resulted in no reply. A request for CCA has never materialised - even though letter has been accepted and the money cashed. After reading through all evidence Restons refused to carry the case - so after a year and half gap an Indian outfit called AEGIS is writing to me.

 

What I want to know is that despite all this - I have spoken to Experion about the black mark on my report and they have said that only MBNA can remove that as it is them that have initiated it. But since this was NOT my debt - ho can I clear this fiasco? Do I need to get a solicitor involved? Taking into account that MBNA have NEVER replied to any of my communication (legal or otherwise). This is really worrying me as I need to apply for a small loan - and have already had a credit card declined on me.

 

Any advice as to how I can clear the MBNA crap would be great.

 

Many Thanks

Kal

Edited by ukaviator
Edited certain words
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you still got any written proof that this fraud has been recorded?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BRIGADIER2JCS Yes I have all correspondance between myself and MBNA and their solicitors and the Financial Ombudsman. Many of the letters have just been one-way where I have not had a reply from MBNA. Experian say that they cannot deal with requests like this unless authorised by the organisation concerned. LK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have checked with some colleagues of mine if you can prove that

fraud has taken place you should report this to your local police

if they try to give you the brush off insist on speaking a senior officer.

You should then get a crime reference number to refer to MBNA and the solicitors.

also if it is possible I would consult a solicitor who can write a formal request

for information and redress for the foul up they have made.

You could require the CRA to place a notice of disassociation on your report.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BRIGADIER2JCS I already went to the Police and have obtained a crime reference number - they told me that no they do not have any powers to chase these up unless instructed to by either the financial firm involved or by a solicitor. all they can do now-a-days is log the crime and provide a number. All this information was provided to MBNA. MBNA have also informed me of what has happened, and how the company where the large amount was transactioned appears to be a bogus company as it does not exist etc etc - in short they already had all this information - but still let someone process the transaction - and now are trying to place the blame someplace. I tried contacting the CRA to place a note of disassociation by like i mentioned they require proof from the originator to carry this out. Since this incident happened in 2007 - and I had been figting since than - MBNA have stopped sending me letters themselves since mid 2009 - when I got a solicitor to write a long winded legal letter to them (to which I still have not recieved a reply and neither has teh solicitor). I, however have recieved the odd letter asking for payment from debt collection agencies based in India - but those I have ignored. I shall speak to a solicitor again - lets see what they say. I just don;t want to keep spending MY money on a screw up that MBNA have done. I wish I could all the money spent back. Thanks for yoru help. ~LK~

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are most welcome defo get a solicitor involved asap

tell whoever you consult you want the firmest challenge possible.

good luck Kid!!

Keep us posted on everything.:-)

Another route write to Tony Hetherington at Finacial Mail

he gets a lot of good reponse from this type of problem.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am sorry to hear about your case Londonkid. I have a similar issue with mbna which is in the courts at the moment. The case has been allocated to FT but as usual mbna are not following the order of the court for disclosure. Unliike yourself I lost my id i believe whilst living in students accomodation in london around 2003 and I only found out about 3 years ago when I returned back to the UK after working oversees for awhile. Even though they know I did not use the cards they say I have to find the person and prosecute them.They seem to make the law for themselves as they go along. their defence in the court case is that because someone had made a few payments on the card initially it is not fraud.

 

Several police officers have told me that that type of fraud is quite common especially in london and other big cities where there may be immigrants or people with bad credit who may choose to assume someones id so that they can be able to have a credit card. They may continue to make payments on the cards until they go back home, or loose their jobs or even get official documents to have credit in their name, then the victim will find out and then its an uphill struggle for them to clear their credit file.

My advice is they will not remove it from your credit file because, their believe is if you need to make for example a mortgage application urgently,the victim will give in and clear the alleged debt.

In my case the debt was sold off to a DCA and I issued a court claim for them to proof my indebtedness to them and also to remove the bad marking from my file. I won and my credit file has been cleared now for over 7 months. However, mbna stated to write to me again to make payments because I believe the DCA returned the account to them.If you are desperate to remove the marking which I assume you are then, issue a claim in your local CC and let them proof to a court you are responsible for that debt. Read on the Payment Service Regulation 2009 Lending code.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will stick to my original advice Kid see a solicitor if the twits at MBNA wont acknowledge fraud

you are going to need on the spot expert advice.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...