Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

In court on Tues, worried sick CASE ADJOURNED


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4744 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'll fill you in on the situation before I get to the question.

 

Last year we got behind with our mortgage payments owing £2700.

Since January we have been paying an extra £10 a month on the regular payment.

Out of the blue two weeks ago we received a letter with a date for a court hearing for repossession.

 

When I contacted the lender and told them we had an arrangement I was told we hadn't as it only lasts 3mths and that the hearing would still take place.

 

The same week we received a letter from the local council offering help and advice.

As panic had set in I contacted them and had an appointment last week.

 

We went through our finances with the debt advisor,

on paper it didn't really add up,

as she was putting xx amount for clothing, dentist, prescriptions which I told her we don't spend every month, just as and when we need.

 

We have two unsecured loans and she has suggested that we contact the lenders to ask to reduce the payments as it doesn't look good that we are still paying them in full.

I was trying to avoid this as one will be paid off in 12mths and the other in 2yrs.

 

I have managed to contact one of them (the other isn't open at weekend) and asked to reduce the payment.

Unfortunately they told me it can take up to 2wks to proccess and I haven't got that long to sort it.

 

I have offered them half the regular payment, so to the question, is this a reasonable offer that is likely to be accepted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'll fill you in on the situation before I get to the question.

 

Last year we got behind with our mortgage payments owing £2700.

Since January we have been paying an extra £10 a month on the regular payment.

Out of the blue two weeks ago we received a letter with a date for a court hearing for repossession.

 

When I contacted the lender and told them we had an arrangement I was told we hadn't as it only lasts 3mths and that the hearing would still take place.

 

The same week we received a letter from the local council offering help and advice.

As panic had set in I contacted them and had an appointment last week.

 

We went through our finances with the debt advisor,

on paper it didn't really add up,

as she was putting xx amount for clothing, dentist, prescriptions which I told her we don't spend every month, just as and when we need.

 

We have two unsecured loans and she has suggested that we contact the lenders to ask to reduce the payments as it doesn't look good that we are still paying them in full.

I was trying to avoid this as one will be paid off in 12mths and the other in 2yrs.

 

I have managed to contact one of them (the other isn't open at weekend) and asked to reduce the payment.

Unfortunately they told me it can take up to 2wks to proccess and I haven't got that long to sort it.

 

I have offered them half the regular payment, so to the question, is this a reasonable offer that is likely to be accepted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt adviser is right in that making full payments to unsecured lender at the expense of a secured lending would not be looked at favourably by a court.

 

However has the lender looked at other options such as extending the term of the mortgage to reduce payments? adding the arrears to the capital? These are usually last resort options before a lender takes court action.

 

If you can reduce your outgoing to clear the arrears in a reasonable time then your lender should not be pre-suing court action.

 

If you can show to the court that you can make payments to clear the arrears and maintaining the normal regular payments after the arrears are cleared without getting into further mortgage arrears then the court would not normally reposes a property

 

However any court action add coats and charges to your mortgage account making your arrears worse. You may have a case that your lender is not acting reasonable in taking the court action.

 

If you have made a payment plan and stuck to it for 3 months i.e. payments on time and as agreed then the lender should look at any reasonable repayment plan.

 

As for the unsecured lenders you can negotiate with them individually.

 

Basicly do a budget include all income, outgoing, including mortgage etc then divide any left of money between the unsecured lenders credit cards etc .... this is properly what the debt adviser went through with you.

 

Then its a case of negotiations with each lender offer them what you can afford.

 

I went through this with the help of the national debt line they were very helpful http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt adviser is right in that making full payments to unsecured lender at the expense of a secured lending would not be looked at favourably by a court.

 

However has the lender looked at other options such as extending the term of the mortgage to reduce payments? adding the arrears to the capital? These are usually last resort options before a lender takes court action.

 

If you can reduce your outgoing to clear the arrears in a reasonable time then your lender should not be pre-suing court action.

 

If you can show to the court that you can make payments to clear the arrears and maintaining the normal regular payments after the arrears are cleared without getting into further mortgage arrears then the court would not normally reposes a property

 

However any court action add coats and charges to your mortgage account making your arrears worse. You may have a case that your lender is not acting reasonable in taking the court action.

 

If you have made a payment plan and stuck to it for 3 months i.e. payments on time and as agreed then the lender should look at any reasonable repayment plan.

 

As for the unsecured lenders you can negotiate with them individually.

 

Basicly do a budget include all income, outgoing, including mortgage etc then divide any left of money between the unsecured lenders credit cards etc .... this is properly what the debt adviser went through with you.

 

Then its a case of negotiations with each lender offer them what you can afford.

 

I went through this with the help of the national debt line they were very helpful http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually baffled as to why they are taking us to court. As I said we have been paying the extra £10 per month, not a lot extra I know,but they have never asked for any more. At the end of January I went into my bank and asked to do a direct payment to them, unknown to me until a week later which brought us into Feb,when I logged on to internet banking, this payment failed due to the incorrect reference number being inputted at the bank. I immediately contacted the lender and informed them and paid the money over the phone. Towards the end of Feb I paid another payment. I have always paid my mortgage towards the end of the month. So when I received a letter dated 2nd March informing me that we had failed to maintain the agreement and had to pay within 15 days I didn't do anything as it stated not to if it had recently been paid. We then paid another payment at the end of March and like I said, out of the blue one day a letter from the lender said they had instructed their solicitor to start court proceedings and the very next day these court papers arrived.

Anyway, I have done the financial statement and because I am not going to get confirmation from my unsecured loans about my offer in time (one has said it can take up to 2 weeks, I only have one) I have inputted their payments as half the regular amount. So that is why I am asking is it a reasonable amount to offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually baffled as to why they are taking us to court. As I said we have been paying the extra £10 per month, not a lot extra I know,but they have never asked for any more. At the end of January I went into my bank and asked to do a direct payment to them, unknown to me until a week later which brought us into Feb,when I logged on to internet banking, this payment failed due to the incorrect reference number being inputted at the bank. I immediately contacted the lender and informed them and paid the money over the phone. Towards the end of Feb I paid another payment. I have always paid my mortgage towards the end of the month. So when I received a letter dated 2nd March informing me that we had failed to maintain the agreement and had to pay within 15 days I didn't do anything as it stated not to if it had recently been paid. We then paid another payment at the end of March and like I said, out of the blue one day a letter from the lender said they had instructed their solicitor to start court proceedings and the very next day these court papers arrived.

Anyway, I have done the financial statement and because I am not going to get confirmation from my unsecured loans about my offer in time (one has said it can take up to 2 weeks, I only have one) I have inputted their payments as half the regular amount. So that is why I am asking is it a reasonable amount to offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, your mortgage and any other priority expenditure such as council tax, utilities, tv licence and essential living costs such as food/clothing should be paid in full, any unsecured loans credit card debts should be offered pro rata from the amount you have left as disposable income.

 

So if that works out to 50% of the original payment then yes, that is a reasonable amount to offer. But do ensure that you are able to maintain those payments :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, your mortgage and any other priority expenditure such as council tax, utilities, tv licence and essential living costs such as food/clothing should be paid in full, any unsecured loans credit card debts should be offered pro rata from the amount you have left as disposable income.

 

So if that works out to 50% of the original payment then yes, that is a reasonable amount to offer. But do ensure that you are able to maintain those payments :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is also important to maintain payments on the agreed date. If for example a payment is due on 1st of the month and you pay every month on the 2nd, then your lender can show that you are a persistent late payer. If you need a different date to pay, get that sorted first.

 

I don't see any mention of mortgage charges, but you must mention these (I assume there are charges). If those were removed your arrears could be much less or even wiped out.

 

More info here which I hope might help. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?296126-Hot-news-for-anyone-who-has-suffered-mortgage-arrears-charges-irresponsible-lending-or-other-unfair-lender-conduct&highlight=

 

I'm moving your thread to the repossessions forum.

 

Have you completed a form for your defence?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is also important to maintain payments on the agreed date. If for example a payment is due on 1st of the month and you pay every month on the 2nd, then your lender can show that you are a persistent late payer. If you need a different date to pay, get that sorted first.

 

I don't see any mention of mortgage charges, but you must mention these (I assume there are charges). If those were removed your arrears could be much less or even wiped out.

 

More info here which I hope might help. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?296126-Hot-news-for-anyone-who-has-suffered-mortgage-arrears-charges-irresponsible-lending-or-other-unfair-lender-conduct&highlight=

 

I'm moving your thread to the repossessions forum.

 

Have you completed a form for your defence?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was made redundent in 2009 but had mortgage protection for 12mths, then we missed a few payments until I managed to find work a few mths later. In late Dec 2010 we made an arrangement with the mortgage company to pay £10 extra per month as well as the normal payment. I paid the Jan payment by direct payment at my local branch, but a week later,which took us into Feb, when I logged onto internet banking I found the payment had failed due to incorrect ref number. The only thing I can think that happened was the cashier entered a O instead of an 0. I immediately contacted the lender, explained what had happened and made the payment over the phone. Feb payment was made as usual and so was March. Then out of the blue we received a letter informing us that the lender had applied for a repossession order. When I contacted them and said that we had an arrangement I was told we hadn't, as it only lasted 3mths. I remember them saying this in Dec, but it had gone out of my mind and they hadn't been in touch to let me know that I needed to contact them again.

We have had a meeting with a debt advisor from our local council who went through our I&E with us and as were are literally living from day to day advised us to reduce our payments on 2 unsecured loans. I have managed to reduce one to less than half payment, the other one has just sent a form for us to fill out, so that won't be sorted in time for Tues. I was going to ask them for half payments.

With the revised I&E showing the new payments it shows that we can afford to pay back £35. The advisor contacted the lender about this but they wouldn't speak to her without a letter of authority, so I had to contact them myself. At first when I said we could pay the £35, the person I spoke to said they would be going for a suspended order, but then when he went through our I&E and the unsecured loans came up he changed his mind and said they would be going for repossession.

I called the debt advisor and she said that because I had managed to reduce one of the loans by £30 more than expected, to offer that extra as well. She seems to think we will be fine with that. I don't want to offer a high amount and find that I cant pay it. My hubby is on IB and with all these cutbacks we are worried that this may be taken from him at some point which will leave us with less money again.

The thing is, she cannot come to court on Tues to speak for us so we are on our own.

I have already had one experience on my own with a debt collector, which didn't go well and is getting worse, if you want to see why my thread is in legal issues, so I am not looking forward to this at all. My husband will be with me but he suffers with depression so I generally deal with everything.

Sorry for waffling on but feel as though I need to put it all down as I have no-one else to talk to about this.

By the way, the arrears are for just over £2000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was made redundent in 2009 but had mortgage protection for 12mths, then we missed a few payments until I managed to find work a few mths later. In late Dec 2010 we made an arrangement with the mortgage company to pay £10 extra per month as well as the normal payment. I paid the Jan payment by direct payment at my local branch, but a week later,which took us into Feb, when I logged onto internet banking I found the payment had failed due to incorrect ref number. The only thing I can think that happened was the cashier entered a O instead of an 0. I immediately contacted the lender, explained what had happened and made the payment over the phone. Feb payment was made as usual and so was March. Then out of the blue we received a letter informing us that the lender had applied for a repossession order. When I contacted them and said that we had an arrangement I was told we hadn't, as it only lasted 3mths. I remember them saying this in Dec, but it had gone out of my mind and they hadn't been in touch to let me know that I needed to contact them again.

We have had a meeting with a debt advisor from our local council who went through our I&E with us and as were are literally living from day to day advised us to reduce our payments on 2 unsecured loans. I have managed to reduce one to less than half payment, the other one has just sent a form for us to fill out, so that won't be sorted in time for Tues. I was going to ask them for half payments.

With the revised I&E showing the new payments it shows that we can afford to pay back £35. The advisor contacted the lender about this but they wouldn't speak to her without a letter of authority, so I had to contact them myself. At first when I said we could pay the £35, the person I spoke to said they would be going for a suspended order, but then when he went through our I&E and the unsecured loans came up he changed his mind and said they would be going for repossession.

I called the debt advisor and she said that because I had managed to reduce one of the loans by £30 more than expected, to offer that extra as well. She seems to think we will be fine with that. I don't want to offer a high amount and find that I cant pay it. My hubby is on IB and with all these cutbacks we are worried that this may be taken from him at some point which will leave us with less money again.

The thing is, she cannot come to court on Tues to speak for us so we are on our own.

I have already had one experience on my own with a debt collector, which didn't go well and is getting worse, if you want to see why my thread is in legal issues, so I am not looking forward to this at all. My husband will be with me but he suffers with depression so I generally deal with everything.

Sorry for waffling on but feel as though I need to put it all down as I have no-one else to talk to about this.

By the way, the arrears are for just over £2000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I'll find the other thread and merge it.

 

If you want to fight the repossession then I think you need a defence. Sounds like you have an income and expenditure sheet prepared which is good as it will prove what you can pay.

 

Take a look at some of the threads where Ell-enn has helped people with defences.

 

Do you have children or other dependents?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I'll find the other thread and merge it.

 

If you want to fight the repossession then I think you need a defence. Sounds like you have an income and expenditure sheet prepared which is good as it will prove what you can pay.

 

Take a look at some of the threads where Ell-enn has helped people with defences.

 

Do you have children or other dependents?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just merged your other thread so give me a few minutes to read and digest in case the answers to my questions are there.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just merged your other thread so give me a few minutes to read and digest in case the answers to my questions are there.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I see your husband suffers from depression so that's something that you should include in your defence. As for your other debtor, I would expect them to accept a reduced payment as otherwise they would have an unfair advantage over your other debtors. Your mortgage is your priority debt. As long as you provide them with your I&E showing that they are having a fair proportion of your disposable income after priority bills and living expenses they don't really have a choice in the matter.

 

So back to the arrears.

 

Do you know how much you've had in charges added to your account?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I see your husband suffers from depression so that's something that you should include in your defence. As for your other debtor, I would expect them to accept a reduced payment as otherwise they would have an unfair advantage over your other debtors. Your mortgage is your priority debt. As long as you provide them with your I&E showing that they are having a fair proportion of your disposable income after priority bills and living expenses they don't really have a choice in the matter.

 

So back to the arrears.

 

Do you know how much you've had in charges added to your account?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying I do need to fill in a defence form? Should it not have already been sent to the court? I've no idea how much charges have been added at this time, it could take a while to find out.

We have no dependents. My son works and pays his keep, my daughter doesn't work at the moment so doesn't contribute.

The annoying thing is, we haven't missed any of the payments since November so why put us through this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying I do need to fill in a defence form? Should it not have already been sent to the court? I've no idea how much charges have been added at this time, it could take a while to find out.

We have no dependents. My son works and pays his keep, my daughter doesn't work at the moment so doesn't contribute.

The annoying thing is, we haven't missed any of the payments since November so why put us through this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows. Don't worry about the defence not being in. It might not even be the right word. Ell-enn is the expert on this and as long as you have something ready to take with you on Tuesday you should be fine.

 

You mentioned your son pays his keep. Would it be unreasonable to ask him for a little bit more? Does it cover everything he has including food and a share of the bills/mortgage.

 

What's the situation with your daughter. You say she doesn't work or contribute. Is that because she's still at school or in full time education?

 

I'm just trying to make sure all angles are covered. You have to be sure that you can afford what you offer or you'll soon be back in court.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows. Don't worry about the defence not being in. It might not even be the right word. Ell-enn is the expert on this and as long as you have something ready to take with you on Tuesday you should be fine.

 

You mentioned your son pays his keep. Would it be unreasonable to ask him for a little bit more? Does it cover everything he has including food and a share of the bills/mortgage.

 

What's the situation with your daughter. You say she doesn't work or contribute. Is that because she's still at school or in full time education?

 

I'm just trying to make sure all angles are covered. You have to be sure that you can afford what you offer or you'll soon be back in court.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes my son pays a good amount of keep, only because when he was a struggling student we helped him out a lot (pre-redundancy days when I was earning a lot more money than now). My daughter has finished college and is looking for an apprentiship. She was signing on for JSA for a while but came off it as she hated going. I know, she should be made to go, but I hated it when I went so can see her point. We also never received money from my son until he got a job, so its unfair to treat them different. I will stick up for her though and say she very rarely asks for money from us as she does babysitting for a neighbour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...