Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt Collection Advice Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I have just received this letter from Barclaycard, further to requesting copy of the original CCA. This is for a credit card that was first with Morgan Stanley, then with Goldfish, now with Barclaycard. I've copied it verbatim without personal details and amounts:

 

Dear x,

 

I refer to your request for information dated x/x/2011.

 

The information we must provide to you under the terms of Section 78 of the CCA 1974 is prescribed by the Act and the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983. Section 78 of the Act provides that, where a creditor receives a Section 78 request the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (and any document referred to in it) and a statement of the account.

 

I enclose a reconstituted copy of your credit agreement. A statement of your account is below:

 

The current credit limit is x

 

The current balance is x and

 

Your next payment of x will be due on x/x/2011.

 

We are currently unable to provide a copy of the terms of your credit agreement as varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the Act. We accept that we are therefore prevented from enforcing our agreement with you while this state of affairs continues.

Notwithstanding that we cannot currently enforce the agreement; our rights continue to exist under the agreement. You should therefore continue to pay the debt that has accrued on your account. We can and will continue to take any action short of enforcement, which includes reporting to credit reference agencies without also telling them the agreement is currently unenforceable, demanding payment from you, issuing a default notice to you and instructing a third party demand payment or otherwise seek to procure payment. We refer you to the case of Philip McGuffick v The Royal Bank of Scotland [2009] EWHC 2386 in which it was held that none of these steps constituted "enforcement" for this purpose.

 

Please note that the decision in Carey v HSBC [2009] EWHC 3417QB makes it clear that an unfair relationship cannot be said to have arisen between us as a result of the fact that we have not currently complied with section 78 of the Act. To the extent that you seek to allege that an unfair relationship has arisen, such allegations with be opposed.

 

Yours sincerely

 

x x

Barclaycard Customer Services

 

This is what I'm trying to understand: there is no threat of taking me to court to recover payment in this letter, does that necessarily mean that they won't?

 

How can the agreement be unenforceable yet their 'rights continue under the agreement'?

 

Do you think the court cases they mention are relevant to me?

 

Many thanks for your help as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have won my friend,, all they can do is pester you for payment on moral grounds... ha ha ha,,,, if your credit file is shot to heck then why worry,,, just laugh and say RESULT.

 

They can't take you to court, they have no agreement. They need to show the original to the judge if you object.

 

They have rights to request you repay the money, ie, I loan you £100.00 no agreement in writing I gave you the £100 by cheque. Yes it proves I gave you the money but it could have been a gift. I still have a right to ask for my money back but can't do anything legal to get it.

 

No. As they have no copy of your agreement,,, then NO... You will get the MORAL letters through, its the same as I would do to you if I loaned you the £100

 

But in the end,,,, produce the evidence.. simples

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great! 1 down, 5 to go... Been waiting for copies of CCAs from Fairfax for nearly 8 weeks now, wonder what will come back from them. Will keep you guys posted. Thanks guys for your help it's been invaluable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 weeks!!!

 

Send the clowns this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?436-Failure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale.

2nd class post, get "Proof of posting", sit back stop ALL payments to them and ignore.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Due to illness last year, I left things as they were since my consultation with the CLA who negotiated token payments on my behalf.

 

I just wanted to get all this going again - Fairfax have not provided me with copies of the original agreements, it's now coming up to 2 years since the CLA requested them. One credit agreement was provided directly by the original creditor (for a loan, turns out not very enforceable but according to CLA, not worth contesting as I would lose), but that's it, all the rest (credit cards) never provided anything.

 

Time to send 'prescribed timescale' letters then?

 

Also, I have just checked my credit report for the first time in 7 years and aside from the Barclaycard account mentioned above, all other defaulted debts are NOT on my report - so DCAs don't report payment activity? Neither the DCAs nor the repayments I'm making or the original accounts they are for appear anywhere (much to my surprise).

 

Thanks

Edited by resolution3
forgot some info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Just remember, no CCA or the fact that they have failed to supply it, means the debt is now in full dispute and is not enforceable until they provide one.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks will send those - any thoughts anyone on my credit report not showing any DCA activity or repayments? The debts are older than 6 years now so all defaults no longer show, I know that, I'm just surprised given how nasty they've been at times, that my payment activity with them doesn't show up on my credit report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOme DCA's dont report debts on credit files. Others do. No entry on a credit file is a good indication that the debt is possible unenforceable, but it should not be taken as 100% proof. It;s why we and other sites advise you to send specific letters. That way you can get the 100% proof needed.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...