Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lets draw a line under this. I'm not saying I won't upload documents to this site Consumer Action Group, and I'm not saying that I take issue with with CAG data security. I said, "Can you recommend a free offline pdf editor" this is so I can merge the pdf's into one file as requested. Online utilities can be helpful, but we only have their word that they shall delete the uploaded documents in a given timeframe, but have no means of validating this, neither can we confirm that their security is up to scratch, if they were hacked and they weren't deleting as they claimed, then- And so, as I do not wish to upload my documents to a free online pdf merge utility, and that bona fide tools such as Adobe quite rightly aren't free, and you have a maximum upload of 4.88MB, I offered my website - a source that I can control as a viable alternative. From there we seem to have descended into a chaos of misunderstandings and half-truths
    • We have both a savings account and a current account, so thought we would get the £100 fairer share bonus - but we won't. Why?View the full article
    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can you still try negotiate with a DCA once they issued a CCJ claim?


Honeypot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4905 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Is it possible to still negotiate with a DCA when they have issued a CCJ summons?

 

I have been too scared and too stupid to face up to one of Restons letters and so as I havent made contact they are sueing me.

 

Can I still write to them and try sort or is it futile now.

 

Thanks

 

Vicky

xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my experience, they will only accept full settlement at this point. They are not open to negotiation as they want their fees. Watch out for them adding 'Collection Fees' or similar to the claim, usually without justification. Make sure you get all the paperwork you need to support your case as they will also try to avoid providing it and pretend it is because they know better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your speedy replies.

 

Unfortunately I dont have a case to fight this. Everything has been done correctly.

 

Do you just fill out the Income/Expenditure on the back of the N9A form and wait to hear if a judge has accepted your payment offer?

 

Thanks

 

Vicky

xxxx

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The N9A form says to send it to the claimant and not to the court?

 

Which is correct?

 

It's a stupid, stupid rule.

 

If you send it just to the claimant there is nothing to stop the claimant telling the court that they have not received the offer. This means the court may enter a default judgment in favour of the claimant, and as such allow the claimant to then proceed with potential enforcement measures.

 

By sending the court a copy too it may catch creditors out if they are trying to dupe the courts into granting a default judgment.

 

So, although the paperwork states to send it to the creditor only I quite like the extra piece of mind that sending it to the court also would give.

 

Hope that makes sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may not think you have a case to fight but you do have a right to enter a defence, and with Restons there are quite often glaring errors they do.

 

If you want to roll over and accept a ccj then go ahead, otherwise a solid defence can be written which casts doubt on the validity of Restons claim against you and against the amount of the claim. Just because 'everything is done properly - and whos view is that?' doesn't mean to say it is right in the eyes of the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Is it possible to still negotiate with a DCA when they have issued a CCJ summons?

 

I have been too scared and too stupid to face up to one of Restons letters and so as I havent made contact they are sueing me.

 

Can I still write to them and try sort or is it futile now.

 

Thanks

 

Vicky

xxxx

 

Hi there

in theory YES -- a claim is only a CLAIM --until it goes to Court anything is possible.

 

However I notice that RESTON's are the people issuing a claim.

 

I don't want to upset you but you can search on RESTONS and you will find a lot of horror stories about this particular firm -- THEY ARE HORRIBLE TO DEAL WITH, WILL GO TO COURT EVEN IF YOU ARE 5 SECS LATE WITH ANY PAYMENT AND ARE ONE OF THE FEW FIRMS WHO WILL EVEN ATTEMPT TO FORCE A SALE IF THEY GET A CHARGING ORDER ON YOUR PROPERTY --EVEN FOR A SMALL AMOUNT.

 

THESE PEOPLE ARE THE WORST I HAVE EVER EVER HAD TO DEAL WITH BY FAR.

 

However they CAN be beaten. Ensure that ANY ILLEGAL / HORRENDOUS "COLLECTION FEES" are challenged --they are well known for attempting to add humungous fees to their "collection" process.

 

Ensure also you have a VALID STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT at all times. I STILL have an ongoing dispute with these scumbags in that although I cleared a debt the Charging Order still appears to be there --after they agreed that their creditor - HFC Bank with an old Marbles Credit card - would remove it and NEVER was I able to get a decent statement of the account detailling what I paid in, how much was owing and any charges --thank goodness I kept a separate EXCEL spreadsheet of this.

 

If you make ANY agreement with these **** --ensure you stick to it rigorously --these people will NOT go away. Don't let them get a charging order either. If you can offer the COURT something BEFORE the hearing DO SO as this should stop these people in their tracks.

 

I don't want to be pessimistic but with RESTON'S you've unfortunately drawn the "short straw".

 

This Firm makes even the Notorious "Bryan Carter" - much beloved by Caggers - seem like Mother Teresa by comparison.

 

Good Luck in any case.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

You may not think you have a case to fight but you do have a right to enter a defence, and with Restons there are quite often glaring errors they do.

 

If you want to roll over and accept a ccj then go ahead, otherwise a solid defence can be written which casts doubt on the validity of Restons claim against you and against the amount of the claim. Just because 'everything is done properly - and whos view is that?' doesn't mean to say it is right in the eyes of the law.

 

Only if there is a triable issue with a reasonable prospect of success. If you lose you could be held liable for substantial costs. Due to the recent test cases successful defences are becoming more and more difficult. One should always ensure they have a very good chance of winning prior to making the decision to defend

 

of course there are losts of solid aguments against Restons and their ilk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...