Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap As far as am aware the loan was paid of some 8 years ago
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Godebt trying to make me bankrupt !!!!!!!!


patricapearl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an agreement with GE Capitol to purchase telephone equipment back in 2002 in 2006 I upgraded the system again and I explained to the salesman i still had an outstanding balance on the 1st agreement, he said that was fine he would consolidate the amount left over and it would be covered by my new agreement. I assumed this had been acheived.

At the beginning of December 2010 I received a letter from a company called GODEBT. They told me I owed GE Capitol and they had "bought" my debt and I had to pay them £1843.58 I told them I would first contact GE Capitol. On the 13th December I received another letter from Godebt with copies of letters suposedly sent to me back in 2006 none of which I had received. this letter gave me 7 days to pay £1843.58 if I didnt then they were going to charge me £3814.64 (not a bad markup for a months work!)

I telephoned Godebt to say I had written to GE Capitol and was awaiting a reply the man on the other end said that was of no concern to him and kept on insisting I owed the money and he was going to make me bankrupt if I didnt pay immediately, I told him not to threaten me and put the phone down.

This morning I received a "Bankrupcy statutory demand appointment letter" via Royal Mail telling me they had called at my address for the purpose of serving me with a statutory demand (didnt know postmen were able to moonlite!) and they would call again on the 12th January !!!!!!!!

Advice would be greatly received

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would wait till Wednesday then and see what transpires, more than likely nothing.

Just trying it on, but you never know with the collection industry at the moment

 

They also sometimes use the names "Edwards Geldards" and "Hollis Briggs".

 

Rather than negotiate with debtors, they usually intimidate with threats of bankruptcy

 

Complain to thier MD

William Rhodes (Managing Director)

Tel - 0870 013 1420

Fax - 029 2034 0753

Mail - PO Box 371, Cardiff, CF10 3WN

e-mail - [email protected]

 

Stop speaking to them on the phone, they will tell you anything as long as it gets them a payment.

 

Is this a business loan?

 

Have you contacted GE Capitol again to see why they have't replied?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep it was a business loan, which I thought had been settled, I contacted GE but they said it was "out of thier hands" and to contact Godebt !! real big help !Im not against paying the original debt which is £1200 but not £3800 they want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As alfwithhair says, 'wait and see whether they serve it'. You have said in your post GE have said the matter is out of their hands..... I would presume the debt has been sold to the debt collectors for little value.... If they do Serve the Demand and you have not been served with NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT then you could apply to the court for the demand to be set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what ! I arrived home from work yesterday to find a hand delivered letter on my mat (Dated 04/01/11) A Statuory Demand.

These people are such shisters not only have they added more interest than the original debt, but the date we first heard from them was the beginning of december ! I went to the court to day and got an "application to set aside a statutory demand" hope the courts read this site concerning these people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only set aside a statutory demand if you have a reason to do so. This means we need ot try and find a technical reason which will give you reasonable prospect for success. If you make an application which fails you could be held liable for further costs.

 

All that aside I'll be very surprised if they actually petition to make you bankrupt as it's expensive for them to do with no guarantee of them recouping their money. Creditors only usually take the bankruptcy route if there are assets - e.g. property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say this was a Buisness loan. Am i right in thinking that you had a business at the time and took the loan out under your business name? If so was the business registered as a Ltd Company? Because if it was a Limited company that you have/had, and the loan was in your company name and not yours truelly, then you are not even personally liable for the debt as it is your business that would be liable not you. Is the business still up and running?

 

If you were/are a sole trader then unfortunately you would be liable for the debt, but still they mislead you when you upgraded the system by informing you that the remaining outstanding balance would we consolidated into the original agreement. Which they have clearly failed to do, as such you have grounds to set aside due to being original informed that the original outstanding amount was consolidated in to the new agreement when you upgrade your equipment, and as such you have no objections to paying the amount in question as part of the new agreement that you were led to believe the amount would be consolidated into. Minus the Extortionate claims on interested that have since been added by Godebt, off course.

 

Also can you post up a copy of this statutory demand minus personal and account details so we can review it. As from how you have discribed these losers i wouldn't be surprised if the demand was a mock up. Or depending on if your company was limited or not, it may well be invalid if they have got the legalisation details wrong. So i would be very interested in seeing it. Also dropping it on your doormat means it is not deemed as served, because in order for it to be deemed as servered it must been served in person to you or by recorded delivery where you signed for it.

 

In fact, heres a link to a site that will provide you with some valuable information: ** COMMERCIAL LINK REMOVED, PLEASE READ FAQ'S **

Additional Information

 

Also forgot to mention the following:

A statutory demand must show a named person or persons from the Creditor or their agent/solicitor whom you can contact directly. This is Rule 6.2 of The insolvency Rules 1986.This means that if the statutory demand doesn't give the name of a person you can speak to then it is not valid. If you try to contact the named person and they won’t put you through then it is also invalid.Be aware that named people on accompanying letters are not part of the Statutory Demand - only those on the Demand itself are valid.Important - make notes of dates/times you try to call the named person on the statutory demand, together with the name of the person that you spoke to and a note of what was said. Write and confirm everything said by Special Delivery.

So look closely as no name given on the demand means just another worthless threatogram.

 

Also you can have it set aside on the simple grounds that the debt is in dispute :wink:

 

This is an example of what a satutory demand should look like http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-1.pdf

Edited by teaboy2
added Additional Information

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GoDebt tried this with me back in 2009 early 2010 I saw it through right to court, I put my defense in on the latest day I could. I turned up at court they didn't, judge awarded me costs, they tried to weedle out of it, judge made them pay up.

 

Drop me an IM I can give you some interesting snippets about these muppets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Olshep, its great to see that you won against these lowlifes. But CAG does not condone giving advice by IM (Or PM). So if you have any thing that will help the OP here, then please post it in this thread so that the OP and others looking for similar help and advice can look at it.

  • Haha 1

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...