Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Small claim fiasco.


alexander62
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone I just thought I would post this after I took someone to the small claims court for a debt of £4000.

The circumstances were... I lent someone £4000 topay their mortgage as her husband had been sent to prison and I tried to help her out. The outcome was ..she refused to pay me back anything so I took her to court. The case was dismissed even though I had loads of evidence saying she owed me the money and she had nothing apart from her word saying it was a gift which it clearly wasnt. I even had evidence from her husband stating it was in fact a loan. I was grilled by the judge severely at the start of the case and he did not hear any evidence at all. He just asked me if I had given a date when the loan had to be paid back. Iduly replied no as I had trusted her to repay me at a point in the near future. His point was as there was no date given to pay it back then she could take forever to pay it and there was no likelihood of me ever getting it back. Even as she had put her property on the market and stood to make a substantial profit from the sale. I was basically stitched up like a kipper so to speak so everyone be warned please get legal advice before you decide to take a claim to the small claims court. There is no room to appeal as it has to go back to the same judge for his approval to take it futher.I mistakenly thought all I had to do was prove there was a debt owed and if it was over 51per cent chance that I was owed the money he had to find in my favour even if I did not get the money back, that would be a matter for enforcement. Sorry to ramble on but I am gutted and have lost all faith in the judicial system.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I provided witness statements proving that the money was a loan one statement from her husband and one from my wife also mobile phone texts proving it was a loan. My total argument is why when I have proved she borrowed the money the judge said there was no case to answer when there was no end date when the loan became payable in full. All I wanted was a judgement to say she owed it not how long it would take to pay it back. I fully expected not to see it again but she walked out of the court cheering as she had won.....She won nothing apart from showing that she was just another sponging low life that has beaten the system. I am honest and dont tell lies yet I have lost and to add she is my stepdaughter, she has devastated her mother and the rest of the family. If I had lied in court and provided a end date when the loan had to be paid back I probably would have won the case thats what you get for being honest.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will find that what you provided may of been evidence but it wasnt clear proof of a loan, this would be a signed proper loan agreement (which with the benefit of hindsight is what you should of done).

 

Clearly in this case, the judge decided that there was not enough proof that a proper loan had been made and it came down to your word against theirs.

 

I doubt whether anyone here could advice you a lot more without seeing the actual documents that you provided to the court.

 

I'm unsure as to the appeals procedure and how it applies to small claims but it might be worth investigating.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry you feel that way, but the judge acted correctly.

 

Your case wasn't for a declaration that you were owed the money, but for you to obtain a judgment so you could recover the money from her. Since you failed to set a date by which she should repay you, or made arrangements on instalments which she then defaulted on, then the judge was absolutely right not to grant you judgment.

 

Let's put it another way: imagine that you borrowed money from a friend, and you verbally agree you will repay in in 2 yrs time to the day. 6 months later, out of the blue, friend decides he wants his money back NOW. You obviously don't have it, so he takes you to court. How would you feel if the judge sided with your friend and found that you had to repay the money immediately and that he can send in bailiffs if you don't come up with the cash? I am pretty sure you wouldn't be too impressed.

 

In the absence of a written agreement and only one word against another's, the burden was on you to convince the judge that what you said was true, and since you didn't even have a basic agreement as to when to repay it, I don't understand how you can expect the judge to find in your favour. You had to prove that it was a loan and that she had defaulted on the repayment. You had no proof, so your case was dismissed. I'm afraid that is the correct decision from the judge even if you don't like the result, and an expensive lesson for you to always set terms in writing, even with someone you think you can trust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for those replies and I fully understand why I did not get the judgement, but I did have proof in text from a mobile phone on different occasions that it was a loan and a signed statement from her husband stating it was a loan and it would be paid back but no particular date. I accept I have lost the case and worse still a member of my family who I thought I could trust. Thats life I suppose I will now get on with my life thanks for your replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, I completely understand your bitterness. I was stitched up (hundreds, no thousands thankfully!) by a friend of my DD's, who lived under our roof when she had nowhere else, and who was treated like a member of the family for years, and it still rankles years after the even that she took advantage of us in such a manner. However, I do believe that what goes around comes around and I have to hope that in her future life, she in turn will find out what it feels like to be betrayed like that. As you say, what's done is done, no point in chewing on it, you'll give yourself an ulcer and it won't change a thing. It does get better after a while if it's any consolation. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...