Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.  Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

**Urgent** Judgement forthwith today/Chg order looming /Restons/Mbna Help please.


baggles
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4964 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This morning we have received a letter from Land registry. With a notice of application to register a restriction against the land! It states that Restons on behalf of MBNA went to court to apply for this on the 18th August 2010. WE were never informed!!!!!!!

 

The story before is a s follows.

My husband had an MBNA credit card with £9K on it. Due to recession we got in to difficulty paying our creditors. We asked MBNA for reduced payment frozen interest etc which they did for 7 mths. We paid every month a small amount as agreed. Unfortunately with lots of other huge stresses my husband hadn't realised that the 7 mths had passed and the DD had stopped until he got a letter from Restons a month later. He spoke to MBNA tried to come to payment arrangement and or settlement figure to no avail. He had been paying £73 which is what MBNA had said they would want should he go into a debt management plan with them. Restons wanted £250 which we could not afford. We wrote continuosly asking for them to accept the £73. Restons kept saying NO! However they continued to accept the £73 for the last 6mths and continued to threaten court action. He is in a DMP with Payplan and everone else agreed to the lower payments. We also have an email from Payplan saying Restons had agreed to the £12 that they were paying to them on top of the £73 we are fighting to find every month!!

We have had NO letters from any court. No letters saying Restons have applied for a CCJ against my husband, apparently they have to do this before going for a charge against our property. Is this true?

This Credit was in my husbands name solely Not mine, out house is in joint names, we have 1 dependant child aged 5yrs. Our House has a Mortgage on it of £287,000 it is worth £300,000 MAX!!

 

I am terrified, am in tears and in fear of loosing my home. Please can someone advise us what to do? Restons have been SO unreasonable, we have literally dozens of letters we have sent them recorded delivery! Also we have asked Restons for a copy of the 'signed' CCA and they say they don't hold it. We have also requested it from MBNA and heard nothing!!

Thank you in advance for yr help.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You'll need to apply to the court to have the ccj set aside. I'm in Scotland so the process is different to yours but I would start by contacting the court and asking them for advice. You need to explain the situation and try and show that you never received the necessary documentation.

 

Judges are reluctant to throw people out on the street especially if they have young children but you need to convince them that you were left in the dark about the court case.

 

I wouldn't expect any sympathy from the debt collectors, they'll do anything and say anything in order to get the money. Make sure you keep copies of letters sent/received aswell as any proof of posting as they can help your cause.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Husband will speak to the court tomorrow and will see what they say. It seems SO unfair that Restons & MBNA won't come to 'any' arrangement with us. What are we to do we simply cannot afford to pay it in one go. We have paid every month, we hope that this will go in favour with the judge??? We have never not wanted to sort it out, it seems so un reasonable.

 

Has MBNA actually sold the debt to restons or do restons just collect on their behalf? Does anyone know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE help us!!

This morning we have received a letter from Land registry. With a notice of application to register a restriction against the land! It states that Restons on behalf of MBNA went to court to apply for this on the 18th August 2010. WE were never informed!!!!!!!

 

The story before is a s follows.

My husband had an MBNA credit card with £9K on it. Due to recession we got in to difficulty paying our creditors. We asked MBNA for reduced payment frozen interest etc which they did for 7 mths. We paid every month a small amount as agreed. Unfortunately with lots of other huge stresses my husband hadn't realised that the 7 mths had passed and the DD had stopped until he got a letter from Restons a month later. He spoke to MBNA tried to come to payment arrangement and or settlement figure to no avail. He had been paying £73 which is what MBNA had said they would want should he go into a debt management plan with them. Restons wanted £250 which we could not afford. We wrote continuosly asking for them to accept the £73. Restons kept saying NO! However they continued to accept the £73 for the last 6mths and continued to threaten court action. He is in a dmp with Payplan and everone else agreed to the lower payments. We also have an email from Payplan saying Restons had agreed to the £12 that they were paying to them on top of the £73 we are fighting to find every month!!

We have had NO letters from any court. No letters saying Restons have applied for a CCJ against my husband, apparently they have to do this before going for a charge against our property. Is this true?

This Credit was in my husbands name solely Not mine, out house is in joint names, we have 1 dependant child aged 5yrs. Our House has a Mortgage on it of £287,000 it is worth £300,000 MAX!!

 

I am terrified, am in tears and in fear of loosing my home. Please can someone advise us what to do? Restons have been SO unreasonable, we have literally dozens of letters we have sent them recorded delivery! Also we have asked Restons for a copy of the 'signed' CCA and they say they don't hold it. We have also requested it from MBNA and heard nothing!!

Thank you in advance for yr help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the first thing is you will not lose your home..the reason restons only managed to get a 'restriction' is because they could not get a charging order as the home is jointly held..all this means is when/or if you sell your solicitor should write to restons two weeks after sale and inform them that the house has been sold and they can bu**er off

i hope this explains it a bit better

http://www.bllaw.co.uk/pdf/financeandrecoveries_0806_charging%20orders%20on%20property.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think restons just collect on their behalf but dont take my word for it.

 

Judges tend to look unfaviourably on people who use the courts as a means of enforcement without taking adequate steps to resolve the issue (with the other party) and the fact that you have maintained payments will work in your favour.

 

The courts may refer you to a consumer debt service for advice who may be able to go over the process of getting the judgement set aside. It is also worth you trying to get hold of some books on County Court procedures as they should help you to understand the process and give you more confidence.

 

I think that if you can get the case before a judge you'll probably get a fair bit of sympathy but your focus at the moment should be on getting that judgement 'set aside'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will speak to the courts tomorrow to find out if they have got a CCJ on my hubby and also to get it 'set aside'.

 

Surely we would of heard from the courts, no? Doesn't the creditor have to get an interim order that we have so many days to pay and if we do nothing then they can go for the restriction order? We have not received any paper work from courts or restons, other than the restons standard letters threatening court action!

 

Is it worth us trying to spk to MBNA about a settlement? Or will they no longer deal with us?

Also with a 'Restriction' in place (if they got it) would they then be able to get an order to force us to sell? What is worrying is, the others we have on a DMP may well follow suit? I have never been so scared. We had NO idea that a un-secured loan can be turned into secured one.

 

Also can someone explain the whole CCA thing, as we haven't received ours we can only assume my hubby never signed one? What does this then mean and what do we say in court, surely you can't say you never spent the money, as they would have ways of proving this? No?

Thank you ...................so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will speak to the courts tomorrow to find out if they have got a CCJ on my hubby and also to get it 'set aside'.

 

Surely we would of heard from the courts, no? Doesn't the creditor have to get an interim order that we have so many days to pay and if we do nothing then they can go for the restriction order? We have not received any paper work from courts or restons, other than the restons standard letters threatening court action!

 

Is it worth us trying to spk to MBNA about a settlement? Or will they no longer deal with us?

Also with a 'Restriction' in place (if they got it) would they then be able to get an order to force us to sell? What is worrying is, the others we have on a DMP may well follow suit? I have never been so scared. We had NO idea that a un-secured loan can be turned into secured one.

 

Also can someone explain the whole CCA thing, as we haven't received ours we can only assume my hubby never signed one? What does this then mean and what do we say in court, surely you can't say you never spent the money, as they would have ways of proving this? No?

Thank you ...................so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot of questions so will try to deal with each..you should most definitely have heard from the courts both for a ccj and a restriction order....never speak to any of these people on the phone..make sure it is by letter only and make sure you send letters that are 'signed for' so you have proof of receipt..that way you have a paper trail...can they get an order to sell? no..a restriction is simply that..a restriction..and if you read the link i gave it aint worth anything anyway..it is easy to circumvent....the whole cca thing? if the dca has no cca then they theoretically cannot enforce the debt in court...they must have the correct paperwork in order to do so...somehow they again have circumvented this..i will be interested to see tomorrow whether or not they have ccj registered against your husband..if they do and have not complied with your request for the cca then it should be fairly easy to get the ccj set aside which will make the restriction also null and void...whether you have spent the money or not is neither here nor there....they must have the correct paperwork end of...their are lots of precedents that this is the case....try not too worry..i can absolutely guarantee they cannnot force you to sell the property...

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also like you to send this to restons

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Date:

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. This was signed for as delivered on the **DATE**

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE** (12+2 days after you made the initial request).

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore, you are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before you/your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 78(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested. You will also be aware of the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT's guidelines on debt collection which state under the title Deceptive and/or unfair methods - Examples of unfair practices are as follows - 2.8

 

(i) - 'Failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued'

 

(k) - 'Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonable queried or disputed debt'

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will get this organised today. Thank you. Also I have just been reading on here that Bailiffs can take yr car off yr drive when they can not get entry. I need to check with hubby if they have threatened Bailiffs but that has really freaked me out. We have a 7yr old X5 which is worth 11K and is financed for as much too! It is in my husbands name, Should I change it into my name? What are the chances they will come and take it?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I am assuming that when this goes to court hubby will get a ccj as a matter of course and then they can send in the bailiffs. If you have a payment arrangement set up by the court and you pay it can they still send in bailiffs?

 

Can they take the car if its in my name. Sorry I know I am panicking but I am at home in the day with my Son and am terrified they may turn up and I will open the door and thats it they will push their way in. Should I open it with chain or what, I have never been in this situation and am really freaking out! Sorry!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I am assuming that when this goes to court hubby will get a ccj as a matter of course and then they can send in the bailiffs
No, if it went to court and it's a big if, they would have to produce evidence that a debt exists and that includes an enforceable CCA. Even if they did obtain a CCJ your husband would have needed to have defaulted on the payment of that before they could apply to a court to take enforcement action.
Can they take the car if its in my name.
No.
I am at home in the day with my Son and am terrified they may turn up and I will open the door and thats it they will push their way in.
They cannot force entry. You do not have to open your door to anyone.
Link to post
Share on other sites

they can and do...it has been pointed out before and to various governments that all unsecured loans should come with the proviso...if you cannot keep up payments you could be in danger of losing your home..or words to that effect..however it is better to head this off before you get to that situation...what i do not understand is that in order to get a charge order....the dca must first obtain a ccj then that has to be defaulted on....the poster has so far said that they have had no court papers sent in...so we await to find out what has actually happened

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI There,

It seems it can, if you have something for them to secure it on, property wise. The only saving grace is its my husbands debt so the best they can get is a restriction on our property as its jointly owned but if it was in his name only they could get a Charging order and then go for forcing you to sell yr home, so its essentially a secured debt. Seems UNREAL to me, what exactly is the point of an UN secured debt?????

 

However that's my understanding of it but maybe someone will tell me i'm wrong?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So once again the banks can change the rules to suit even though you took out an un-secured loan.As you have a choice of secured or unsecured loan surely it is tough on the banks if they took the risk of giving you an un-secured loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Waiting for husband to return with news after speaking to the court. He has said tho (as he has before in buisness taken others to court) That the courts have and continue to make mistakes of which he has had first hand experience hence things get set aside. We will fight this. I feel they are so un fair we are in a recession, my husband is an estate agent, we have had to majorly downsize his office, make several redundancies in order to survive and even then we fight each and every day. There is no understanding with the DCA they are nasty pieces of work, I don't know how they sleep at night with the misery and stress they cause and get away with it, its WRONG!! ;-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI There,

It seems it can, if you have something for them to secure it on, property wise. The only saving grace is its my husbands debt so the best they can get is a restriction on our property as its jointly owned but if it was in his name only they could get a Charging order and then go for forcing you to sell yr home, so its essentially a secured debt. Seems UNREAL to me, what exactly is the point of an UN secured debt?????

 

However that's my understanding of it but maybe someone will tell me i'm wrong?!

 

nope you have got it spot on...a restriction is actually a waste of time for them...as i said before you only have to tell them you have sold 2 weeks after sale is completed..so in effect it gets them nothing....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right spoken to hubby and spoken to court and they have said that as he has been continuing to pay the £73 per month AND that Payplan have paid the extra £12 that that is an automatic admittance of monies owed so its irrelevant whether there is a signed CCA or not. They sent the paperwork out whilst were were away at my parents, which amazingly never arrived!! They have no proof they sent it!!!!!! He has now sent in paperwork to have it set aside and has also asked for it to he heard at our local court.

 

So what in the hell do we do now! Is this correct regarding the CCA, surely if this were the case the fact that we all 'used' to pay these credit cards in full admits they are ours?? God its a minefield!!!!!

He paid Restons £10 to get the CCA then they said they didn't hold it, they cashed the cheque anyway! MBNA haven't responded to the CCA request. HELP!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter whether he paid anything, that only applies in the case of it being Statute Barred. If a CCA does not comply to CCA 1974 then it would be deemed unenforceable and it would matter not whether any payments had been made.

 

Once he gets the CCJ set aside it puts it back to square one and everything will revolve around the CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...