Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, welcome to CAG. Thank you for the information, we can start looking at your case now. If you were thinking of doing it, please don't appeal, it causes more problems than it solves because Met and other PPCs almost never allow appeals. DR+ can't do anything to you because they're debt collectors, just part of the letter trail. If it ever went to court it would be Met doing it, or their lawyers. If you have a look around the forum, you'll see we have dozens of threads about the Stansted car park. Read some threads and you'll see how these outfits work. Best, HB
    • I know now, but always thought that if the transaction was excepted by card only way a customer could get a refund is by taking the goods back to get their money back 
    • Hello  Please help, as today I received a letter re. debt recovery.  Is there anything I can do at this stage? The driver fell foul of the confusing car parking situation re. Starbucks and McDonald's. 1 Date of the infringement 13/02/24 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 5/3/24 3 Date received 7/3/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] N 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? CCTV photos 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here  Final reminder on 9/4/24 & Debt Recovery letter dated 30/4/24 In either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY Parking charge (1).pdf
    • Yes I can imagine that kind of thing rankles a lot. I don't know what the timescale is for making chargeback claims. I suggest that you find out and then change your way working so that you keep records at least until then. It may be six months
    • no need to use @username just type. please fill out the sticky  as it asks  dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Issues with AIC - Response from CCA request


amberbamber
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4945 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'm new to the site and know that these questions have probably been posted before but I'm getting rather confused!!!

 

I have two debts with MBNA (one was originaly with Alliance and Leicester and was transfered to MBNA several years ago) both have been transferred to AIC. I sent AIC a CCA request for both accounts and have this morning received a reply saying that as they are only acting on behalf of MBNA I need to contact MBNA direct. Is this correct?

 

They also go on to say "May I also remind you that the full outstanding balance on the accounts £5082 & £4345 are still due and owing and that I should ring them as soon as I receive the letter to prevent further action being taken" Although I said in my original letter to them that I would not be engaging in anymore phone calls with them.

 

Can someone please advise me on what I need to do now as I'm really not too sure!!

 

Thanks and I'm sorry if this is already on the site but I have had so many distressing conversations with AIC (been reduced to tears) that I really need some direct advise from you.

 

Yours in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi amber

 

Welcome to CAG

 

If they are acting for MBNA, then the accounts are still with MBNA. They are probably just debt collectors.

 

1) The first thing to do is check if you have any Penalty Charges or have you been mis-sold PPI on the accounts. These can be claimed back with contractual interest for the last 6 years plus. All templates and spreadsheets

can be found in the library. You can send a SAR Request with £10 postal order, they will send all the data they have on your acount, including statements over the last six years.

 

2) I would resend the CCA Requests to MBNA, they have 14 days to respond, scan, post, removing personal details, the guys here can check the documents and advise if it's possible to put the accounts in dispute.

 

3) Don't speak to DCA over the phone. Only communicate in written form. Heres a Telephone Harrassment Letter:- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?493-Harassment-by-telephone-response-letter

 

There are also Template Letters for Door step visits.

 

Send all letters Recorded. Only print your name on the letters, don't sign. Set up a file for all your documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response.

I wasn't mis-sold PPI but have had numerous penalty charges. Unfortunately I have made the big mistake of shredding all previous letters from AIC as they upset me so much I didn't even want to look at the letters - stupid I know but I will now be retaining everything I receive from them.

I was originally on a repayment plan with MBNA but I defaulted on them both and they then passed the debt / accounts to AIC.

 

I will forward the CCA letters onto MBNA and wait for their response

I have attached the letters as advised. Any further comments would be gratefully received.

 

I will not now speak with AIC over the phone and I did make this quite clear in the CCA letter that I sent to them - am I ok not to communicate with them as they said that I had to ring them on receipt of this letter.

 

img004.pdf

 

Many thanks.

Edited by amberbamber
Attachment issues!!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi amber

 

I've tried looking at the letters, but they are unreadable. You need to get the Penalty charges back, as these with the interest could amount to quite a bit. The fact that you have got Penalty Charges, you have a vaild dispute with MBNA. Start claiming them back. When you get a moment, read the OFT Guidelines on Debt Collection, DCA's think they rule the world, they clearly don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...