Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Claim received re Lloyds Personal Loan


zeeshop
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4929 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks again slick132

I didnt sent CPR 31.16 , but I sent CPR 31.14 as advised to me previously.

 

in my CPR 31.14 before I finally printed I added account statements as well, Please advise do I need to send CPR 31.16 separately for account statements/ transaction details. thanks.

Also what you make of my Credit agreement, where I stand, how enforceable this agreement is, I noticed on agreement heading its says Non cancellable special loan offer, mean once i get money I cant cancel, or what ever?

 

I am very grateful for your support slilck, I was very much stressed before visiting this forum, bless you all.

Below is my updated CPR 31.14 request Which I posted using recorded delivery.

 

Dear Sir,

 

Re: SCM Solicitors DEPT CDR v Mr. Z S Case No: 1**********8

CPR 31.14 Request

 

On 17th October 2010 I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the Northampton County court.

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of the documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the originals should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the default notice

 

3 the termination notice

 

4 Account Statements

 

5 any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim

 

Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise

 

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the documents I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

 

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any versions to include an obligation to recover and preserve such versions which are now in the possession of a third party.

 

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

 

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

 

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

 

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

 

yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

Z

 

Address:

Edited by zeeshop
Special thanks to Slick132
Link to post
Share on other sites

My mistake Zeeshop.

 

I meant to say "CPR31.14 letter" and, if you asked for statements in your letter, that's fine.

 

I will look more closely at the agreement, etc when I have time later.

 

8)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ZS,

 

I've asked for a CCA expert to look in and comment on the credit agreement for you.

 

8)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I think I am right in thinking this loan was taken out and signed for in branch-hence the non-cancellable agreement. If you had taken the forms home or done it by post, cancellation rights would prevail.

 

I do recommend you look at this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?171037#post1845581

 

As your agreement has two elements to it (loan + PPI) I do think it falls under the multiple agreement umbrella

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I think I am right in thinking this loan was taken out and signed for in branch-hence the non-cancellable agreement. If you had taken the forms home or done it by post, cancellation rights would prevail.

 

I do recommend you look at this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?171037#post1845581

 

As your agreement has two elements to it (loan + PPI) I do think it falls under the multiple agreement umbrella

 

HI Silverfox1961 thanks for looking on my loan agreement.

Yes loan was taken in Bank southshields branch, I am sure PPI was missold.

I read multiple agreement thread, but cant figure out where my agreement stands,only thing I understood is that mine is multiple agreement(attached above)

 

I need someone experienced to advise me exactly what I should look in, where my agreement stands, enforceable or not and how can I use it in my defend.

I am still waiting for Lloyds solicitors to reply my CPR 31.14 request.

As Slick132 advised I am in process of preparing my defence, I will post my defence here before post, so someone correct my mistakes.

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks IdaInFife for looking on my credit agreement,

 

If nothing wrong in agreement, any solution some one can advice me how to defend my case. How to prove that PPI was missold.

 

Is there any way to not to get any judgement but settle payment arrangement with bank, or through court but without judgement. I never recieved paper copy of default notice. Only came to know after receiving court claim form.

Reference to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?171037#post1845581

Post 5 to post 12 and so on...

====quote===

Re: Multiple agreements falling within section 18 CCA 1974

31 .05.2005 the rules changed so the agreement containing the PPI what ever it was for would require a separate box for signing to say you want PPI

 

====quote====

I took my loan in 2004. will this not make any difference.

 

 

Thanks and Regards

Edited by zeeshop
extra information
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I sent my CPR 31.14 request to lloyds solicitors on 26 October 2010, using recorded delivery, Just checked from royal mail tracking system, that it was recieved and signed on 01 November.

My question is does 7 days response time from claimant starts from 01 November or before.

Also, do I need to send them reminder again.

I need to submit my defence before 14 November.

 

Thanks and regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ZS,

 

See 31.15 here here - http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/parts/part31.htm#IDA1VOVB

 

"..... the party who disclosed the document must supply him with a copy not more than 7 days after the date on which he received the request."

 

You need not send a reminder. You would simply point out to the court that the claimant has failed to comply with your request made under CPR31.16 on xxdate.

 

Be prepared to use the "embarrassed" defence in any event as this is appropriate given that their POC's are not sufficiently particularised. I referred to this in my post #21 above.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...