Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

detailed fee assessment hearing- Sherforce- ***won*** resolved.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4362 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Excellent result:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoo.gifwhoo.gifwhoo.gifWell Done...I am delighted to hear you have had satisfaction in getting the money owed to you. Perhaps their 'new accountant' should take note to the fact they are not guaranteed automatic payment for their services and they might have to fight for them?

 

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very good to hear that payment has been received but for a High Court enforcment company to ignore a court order is simply dreadful. I cannot belive that this can be happening.

 

Thank you for posting details of this messy situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant rename the title as 'Sherfarce has been pwned' Im afraid, but I can rename it as you won and it has now been resolved. Well done. Its a good feeling when you take on the big boys and win, Im very happy for you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very good to hear that payment has been received but for a High Court enforcment company to ignore a court order is simply dreadful. I cannot belive that this can be happening.

 

Thank you for posting details of this messy situation.

 

Sherforce are without doubt the most arrogant of enforcement companies, as honeyb among others can testify.

 

It is indeed disgraceful to see them blatently flouting the Courts and I agree it takes a lot to believing they are not brought to task over the mockery they make of the system.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very good to hear that payment has been received but for a High Court enforcment company to ignore a court order is simply dreadful. I cannot belive that this can be happening.

 

Thank you for posting details of this messy situation.

 

Not an isolated occurrence, they do this on a regular basis. They are a disgrace and maybe the HCEOA should censure them by kicking them out for a start. One can only hope the MOJ are aware.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sherfarce and their shenanigans needs to be addressed by the MOJ, but they won't go after one of "Their Own" will they? BTW wouldn't mind a pm with the gory details.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Congratulations! I know wher you are coming from having today been back in court over a fight with High Court Enforcement that has been going on since 2009! Happily I too got the right result and some interesting experience - in spite of the headaches it caused me over this time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! I know wher you are coming from having today been back in court over a fight with High Court Enforcement that has been going on since 2009! Happily I too got the right result and some interesting experience - in spite of the headaches it caused me over this time!

 

Would you care to share? I respect your wishes if you do not want to do so in public but am generally very interested.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be more than happy to share - just not sure the best way to do that as I don't want to clog up someone else's thread...? I think there are some useful bits in my experience which include a detailed assessment that subsequently raised some interesting questions that the district judge took away following the hearing, discussed with his colleagues and very unusually recalled his order and cited a case for both sides to research before going in front of him again...

 

Anyway let me know how best I can share this please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that, if you are comfortable with things start a new thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=168 but please remember not to name names. Alternatively send me a PM.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I am able to send you a PM as although I have used the site for assistance through reading threads, I haven't posted any replies until this evening so don't think I qualify to PM yet? Let me know if that's not the case as a PM would be better so that you can decide, with the benefit of your experience, what would be relevant and what to discard for a new thread rather than a lengthy ramble... I will await your advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...