Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Had a previous car loan with this lot. Included in the amount (prior to added interest) on this agreement, is the outstanding balance from the previous loan. This outstanding balance had already been subject to hefty interest on the 1st loan, yet on this agreement they added interest to it again! Also, where it states that the particular Ts and Cs (ref # removed) form part of the agreement, the Ts and Cs they've sent, which they say are part of the agreement, but they are not- they have a different reference number to the Ts and Cs which form part of the (original) agreement. agreeandterm.pdf
    • I would only rely on your solicitor in this regard. The other two should not have a view.   And, you are responsible for how the court perceive you. They only have your words and deeds to go on. Expecting them to magically see things your way is not a great tactic.
    • Yes, I don't think there is any downside to doing this. If they decline then you can say that in your witness statement
    • Ok! Do you still want me to work on that letter you discussed above in post #26?
    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global help


southsider
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4870 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I posted this in General but I think it should be here - apologies for that

 

Hello - I hope someone can help but I suspect my case is hopeless.

 

Sometime ago I had a debt, this debt was sold to a third Party and then was again sold to Arrow Global - at the time I was suffering due to the death of a partner at a very early age.

I ended up with a CCJ that I ignored and eventually an attachment of earnings that I now have deducted from my wage every month.

Since reading this forum I have asked the solicitors representing arrow global for a copy of the letter of assignment and a copy of my original credit agreement.

After my third letter they finally responded (this was sent on the 9th September and I only got the response today)

The letter says

' I confirm that x purchased the portfolio of ys loans on 1st August 2006 and sold them to Arrow Global on 1st December 2006 as a portfolio of consumer loan receivables'

 

xxxxxx

office manager

Arrow Global

 

This does not look like a letter of assignment to me.

 

They didn't get a copy of my credit agreement.

 

Being as this ccj is live and I am paying off money every month is there anything I can do to fight this?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm this sound dodgy.....

 

well the CCJ will take the place of any 'agreement' they have to have,

 

however, i'm concerned this might well have been railroaded through without the correct proceedures taking place.

 

did you ever get any paperwork regarding the CCJ hearing taking place, did you attend?

 

did you ever get a a default notice sent by the OC?

 

did you ever get a termination notice sent by the oc?

 

a few dates and history of the debt would help us too?

 

you might well be able to get this set aside possibly.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

sorry for the delay - hard drive crash

 

No I did not attend the CCJ hearing and only got the paperwork after the hearing

 

I did get a default by the OC

 

Judgement was made for original OC in 2005 and now has passed through two different companies

 

ARROW became effective owners December 2006

 

I'm totally lost as to what I can do but any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

urm this sound dodgy.....

 

well the CCJ will take the place of any 'agreement' they have to have,

 

however, i'm concerned this might well have been railroaded through without the correct proceedures taking place.

 

did you ever get any paperwork regarding the CCJ hearing taking place, did you attend?

 

did you ever get a a default notice sent by the OC?

 

did you ever get a termination notice sent by the oc?

 

a few dates and history of the debt would help us too?

 

you might well be able to get this set aside possibly.

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is worth sending the OC a SAR, this will let you know that theyve added charges onto the account,

Specifically aske for any default notices and dates,

Notices of assignment and computer screen dumps also will tell you certain things. it'll take a while to sort out, but once youve got some paperwork , you can then consider going for set aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

OK - I have received the details from the OC _ I asked them to send everything they had on me.They have sent all statements relating to a Charge Card going back years that I had with them but nothing at all relating to the loan. Not an agreement, any charges, an assignment nothing, it's as if the loan never existed from their point of view.

 

So can anyone help with what I can do now - it looks to me as if procedure has not been followed but I am not sure how to proceed.

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm...

 

i'd really be tempted to stop paying

 

but

 

have you a copy of the CCJ par chance?

 

or can phone the court for one?

 

legally them MUST [the OC] keep paperwork on the 'loan' for 6yrs to prevent fraud/money laundering.

 

i'd fire off the failure to comply letter to the OC.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this from a full SAR ?

Maybe there is more than one creditor ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There debt is held now by Arrow and they get a debit from my salary every month - the original loan was taken out over 6 years ago. But some of the card statements they sent me go back to 2001.

I used the template on here for the SAC and my account number as specified on the CCJ - which I still have a copy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

copy up the ccj

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what its worth, i think the biggest hurdle you have is the obvious delay, this would be a problem to over come in my opinion, case in point, Regency rolls vs Carnell, where it was said that a delay of 30 days in making an application was altogether too long.

 

If you could prove defective service, as in the Claim form was served on an old address and the claimant knew that this was the case but proceeded anyway, then the judgment would be based up an expired claim form and therefore it may well be unsound and as a consequence be set aside

 

however, it will for sure be difficult, and secondly, it may well be very costly if you apply, it is contested and you lose. I would say you could look at anywhere between £2-5000 if you were unsuccessful.

 

This is a risk that you must consider, and i would suggest that you should really research your case heavily and see if you have a good prospect of success and make sure you fully appreciate the situation before you go launching applications to the court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - thanks for all your help. Being as I have an attachment of earnings - and the total debt (at current payment rate) will not be paid off for 17 years, what would you say is a reasonable offer to the creditor in percentage terms of the outstanding debt in order to get it cleared?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as there is a ccj, i doubt they would entertain any reduction.

 

as a matter of interest, getting an sar off to the oc might well reveal that what you are paying not longer reduces the debt. [not showing]

in other words, the oc sold the debt and wrote it off for tax purposes [just guessing here] since

 

if this be the case, then what you are paying is clear profit going to the leeching dca

 

if you start to make such noises when you know, and there is an 'issue' about the transfer of the CCJ [thinking outloud here] they might settle for a smaller and quicker profit.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...