Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
    • That "oh dear" doesn't sound good  
    • Oh dear.. Misuse of facility...  Cat 6... No wonder everything is being nuked from high orbit... More in a bit.. 
    • Thank you fkofilee First question: what do I do if Monzo close my account? I need an account but no one will touch me with this marker against me. Is there anywhere/any other option that I have if Monzo close my account? MCB is My Community Bank?  Yes What Category of Marker do you have? This is what it says on the Cifas SAR: Application date: 07 December 2023 Date recorded: 09 April 2024 Expiry date: 09 April 2030 Cifas Case Identifier: 15435315 Product relating to the application, proposal, account or facility: Personal Loan – Unsecured Facility: Granted Case type: Misuse of facility Reason(s) for filing: Evasion of payment Financial Loss Value of Loss: £5000.00 When did you raise the complaint? Last night via email Do you have Correspondence / Audit Trails of communications showing that you were in severe financial strain due to an event AFTER you took the loan? I can prove that I had to buy a new washing machine, I have my pay slips showing the emergency tax code and a letter from the tax office after I had spoken with them to get it corrected and of course I can get a copy of my vet bill. And all of this was in the first 2-3 months of 2024.  I panicked. Stupid I know and as you say, I have learned the hard way and I am not in any way denying anything that I have done wrong, but it just feels a bit unfair.  It is what it is I guess and if I have to have it on me forever then so be it. I am just so worried about the bank situation 😕    
    • If it is MCB    National Fraud Database Members | Preventing Fraud Losses | Cifas WWW.CIFAS.ORG.UK A range of organisations use the National Fraud Database to share data on confirmed fraud cases, preventing over £1 billion in fraud losses every year.   They are on the register  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA PPI Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4038 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I took a credit card from the above in 1994 and when I filled out the application form I ticked the PPI box as I thought it would help in getting the card and also might be useful. I was employed at the time but in a short space of time I took over the business and became self employed. I've hit hard times and the card has been sold off to a DCA and currently in dispute see this thread

 

I am now led to believe that PPI is not available to self employed people! So although I signed the form requesting the PPI I was not aware of it becoming invalid when I became self employed. I only started to smell a rat when I was struggling and MBNA told me I need to make myself bankrupt for the PPI to pay out. Can I claim it back from the time I became self employed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The PPI,is usually invalid if you are self employed,also if you where led to believe you had to take out PPI to get the credit card this will also make the PPI invalid,and you can claim all of your payments back + compound interest....GO FOR IT..........FS

 

So even though I originally signed to accept it there is no reason why I would be expected to know I needed to cancel it once I became self employed?

 

When I got the SAR info through there was only the last 4 years of statement info contained contained within it. Can I write back and ask for this to be produced or will I need to do a new SAR and demand the full info do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you do not need to produce a new SAR,most banks will produce 6 years of statements and are required to by law,so if MBNA have only produced 4 years ask for the other 2 years,but before doing this ask MBNA under the SAR for a clear and concise statement of all PPI payments since the start of your account.I have read your other thread,the refund of all PPI plus interest could go a long way to reducing your debt by a substantial amount.As the account goes back a long way I doubt that MBNA will be able to prove that the PPI did or did not form part of getting the credit card (if you get my drift) and the fact you became self employed shortly after taking up the credit card (where you not self employed when you took the agreement up ...YES) See what they produce,should they go down the 6 year route,then it will not be unreasonable for you to estimate your claim back to 1994.............see what their reply is first................FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you do not need to produce a new SAR,most banks will produce 6 years of statements and are required to by law,so if MBNA have only produced 4 years ask for the other 2 years,but before doing this ask MBNA under the SAR for a clear and concise statement of all PPI payments since the start of your account.I have read your other thread,the refund of all PPI plus interest could go a long way to reducing your debt by a substantial amount.As the account goes back a long way I doubt that MBNA will be able to prove that the PPI did or did not form part of getting the credit card (if you get my drift) and the fact you became self employed shortly after taking up the credit card (where you not self employed when you took the agreement up ...YES) See what they produce,should they go down the 6 year route,then it will not be unreasonable for you to estimate your claim back to 1994.............see what their reply is first................FS

 

Thanks for that Firstship :D

 

So I need to rough out a letter along the lines of :-

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

You recently provided me with my SAR but the PPI payment information was lacking and goes back nearly 16 years of which you only provided 4 years. Please could you provided a clear and concise statement of all PPI payments since the start of this account under this current SAR by return?

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a rough idea

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

31st August 2010

 

Account No: xxxxxxxxxxx

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the above account at the time the account was opened.

 

2. Copies of all documents which include any of my personal information including copies of any contacts or invoices, emails or computer records containing my personal information, or any records which pertain to this information.

 

3. Copies or transcripts of any correspondence in postal, email or any other format which you have entered into with any individual, organization or third party which contains my personal or financial, or which pertains to me.

 

4. Documents relating to any Payment Protection Insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions at the time the account was opened.

 

5. Where any previous information or records held have been deleted or disposed of, the methods used to do so, including dates, certificates or references confirming details of destruction. Where you are unable to provide such certificates, please provide a declaration, signed by an authorised officer of your company, confirming the dates and methods of destruction of this data.

 

6. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

 

7. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

 

8. Full hard copy print outs of my personal or financial information, held in a digital, magnetic or any other format which is held in any archives, backups or other storage devices / locations.

 

9. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the above account.

 

PLEASE NOTE that unless otherwise stated by yourselves and if the above documents are NOT provided, it will be CONFIRMED that you are unable to reproduce/provide in any way shape or form any copies of the above requested documents. You are reminded that you have a duty to inform me if you do not have the above documents. This is confirmed in High Court Law - Ezsias v Welsh Ministers - [2007] All ER (D) 65 (Dec)

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply all the above documents in line with the Information Commissioners Technical Guidance update (Dated August 2007)

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

cab

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now posted the request for additional PPI information for the full c. 16 year period.

 

The DCA are now pressing me for payment(given me 10 days from 26/8/10 before further action will be taken) as they have supplied what they think is a workable CCA. Or is this just more bluster!!! Can I hold them off by telling them I am now disputing the PPI part of the card balance and or the fact that I'm pretty sure the debt was sold to them without a Default Notice being sent to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you might well have to 'guestimate' what you paid in ppi in the years prior to what statements you have/are likely to get.

 

do you have the original agreement par chance?

 

and when was YOUR last financial transaction [in/out] on the dard?

 

i would not worry too much about the DCA, there's little they can do to you & would have brought the debt for 3p/£ so's it wont be worth their while once they catch wind of the PPI reclaim.

 

pers i'd ignore them.

 

nothing to stop you sending a letter to wind them up though...

 

something along the lines of

 

you are claiming there is £XXX outstanding , currently i'm looking to reclaim £XXX PPI so the A/C is in dispute anyhow.bye bye any debt you are currently trying to fleece me for.........

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

didn't know you'ed sent a cca...have we seen it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info so far :D

 

While I'm waiting for MBNA to respond to my request for the full 14+ years of PPI I've paid I've been looking at the calcutators in the stickies on here. I can see how they work fine and the single figure I put in as a test turned a £46 PPI payment into nearly £150 over 4.5 years. I worked this out using an interest rate of 18% which was plucked out of the air to be fair. I'm just wondering how I should find out these rates as I have nothing in my SAR that mentions rates charged over the time of the card although I realise the 8% added at the end is fixed?

 

When I do get my figures I can see it's going to take me a month of sundays to type it all in and add it all up but I'm kind of looking forwards to it :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info so far :D

 

While I'm waiting for MBNA to respond to my request for the full 14+ years of PPI I've paid I've been looking at the calcutators in the stickies on here. I can see how they work fine and the single figure I put in as a test turned a £46 PPI payment into nearly £150 over 4.5 years. I worked this out using an interest rate of 18% which was plucked out of the air to be fair. I'm just wondering how I should find out these rates as I have nothing in my SAR that mentions rates charged over the time of the card although I realise the 8% added at the end is fixed?

 

yea that going to be your difficulty is 'guestimating the int they charged you on the years you don't have statements for.

as for the 8%

i would pers refrain from adding that until/if you move to the court stage.

When I do get my figures I can see it's going to take me a month of sundays to type it all in and add it all up but I'm kind of looking forwards to it :D

 

you should be in for a tidy sum.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

either look in the MBNA forum for info of int rates for those years you need

or start a new thread there asking if people have that info.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk I will do that shortly :D

 

I'm just going to post the following off to Experto while I wait for the info to come back from MBNA.

 

 

Experto Credite Ltd,

Windrush House,

24 Portman Road,

Reading,

Berkshire,

RG30 1EA

 

Dear Sir,

 

Ref: Account No/Experto Ref No

Ref: Letter dated 26th August, 2010

 

Dear Sir,

 

As far as I am concerned this account is still in dispute with you and also with MBNA. As soon as the mis-sold PPI going back 15 plus years is sorted out with MBNA I will be willing to discuss this further with you.

 

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

Mr XXXXXX XXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd p'haps add to or change the last line to read.

 

should there be an outstanding balance remaining.

 

that'll wind 'em up

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the attached letter today from Experto. Still not received any further PPI info back from MBNA so as yet have not registered an actual dispute with MBNA as I have no figures yet to work it all out. I'm assuming MBNA will now reply to Experto that the account is not in dispute with them so is there a letter I should get off to MBNA showing my intent to dispute the PPI or just wait for the info to come through?

 

As an aside, not sure I've asked this already or not but can't find it anywhere, is there anything I can do regarding the charges on the account for late payments over the years and or the huge charges levied when I stopped paying?

 

web.jpg?ver=12841994070001

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all. Still not got any more info back from MBNA re PPI payments from the start of my card but I have found my DN now but I don't appear to have a Termination notice nor does it show on my Comms Log.

 

My DN was written on the 8/2/10 and expired 25/2/10 but according to my Comms Log the debt was sold to Experto on the 18/2/10. I'm reading on here about DN's and see that in certain circumstances they can render the debt invalid so that only the arrears can be requested. This leaves me in a bit of a quandary as to whether I should wait and see what happens without claiming the PPI back until the DN is proven to be wrong as if I pursue it any monies won will be paid to the DCA which could be paid to me if the DN is wrong? Sorry not worded well but I hope you can see where I'm coming from :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...