Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit fraud IUC what happend now?


saraloui69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello,

I have had a IUC and they have put an alleged allagation to me. My husband and i was claiming HB CT IS IC CT and WT not all constantly. My husband handles all claims and i just sign mainly without reading them. They have all payment going into my bank account and also have proof that he worked, which i didnt understand as he told me he informed them. But it was all there in black and white for about 3 years, now he has the benefit paid into his bank which i thought we wasnt claiming anything and it turns out he never stopped our claim (or told them of work since 2002).

What will happen if im found guilty as it was only me at the iuc, and i am really worried about this, will the give me a custodial sentance or can my husband take the blame?

Can they make us sell the house?

worried saraloui69:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sara.

 

If any of the claim forms were made in your name and signed by you, then I'm afraid that you will be held responsible, because when you sign the form you are signing the declaration. The declarations are all similar, but as an example, I've given the declaration for income support:

 

I understand that

● if I knowingly give information that is incorrect or

incomplete, I may be liable to prosecution or other

action.

● I must promptly tell the office that pays my benefit

of anything that may affect my entitlement to, or

the amount of, that benefit.

I declare that the information I have given on this

form is correct and complete as far as I know and

believe and I have included all my income and

savings.

It also states on the income support documents:

 

Under sections 111A and 112(1A) of the

Administration Act 1992 it is an offence to fail to notify

a change of circumstances promptly. Failure to tell us

about a change in your circumstances promptly may

result in action being taken against you.

Any correspondance that is sent reminds the claimant of their responsibility to inform of a change of circumstances, and what those changes might be. If you were named as the claimant, the responsibility falls on you to inform them, unless your husband has been appointed by the secretary of state to act on your behalf for benefit purposes or otherwise legally handles your affairs (power of attorney for example). They may well chase him too, if he was a joint claimant.

 

What also needs to be established is whether, when your husband asked you to sign these forms is whether the claims were fraudulent from the outset - i.e you indicate that they became fraudulent due to an undeclared change in circumstances - but because you didn't read what the forms were about, there may never have been an entitlement to some of the benefit at all. For example in order to claim income support back then, you would either have needed to be a lone parent, claiming on the grounds that you were in incapacitated (and failed to secure IB due to a lack of contributions) or a carer. You would also have to have had periodic contact with the jobcentre and signed things there (work focussed interviews, for example).

 

What happens now is that they will send all documents they have and the recorded interview to the decision maker. They will work out how much has been overpaid. If the amount of the overpayment is more than £2000, it is automatically referred to the prosecution division to commence prosecution proceedings. If this happens, I would strongly recommend you seek legal advice from a solicitor dealing in criminal law. You can get some free advice here also.

 

I've attached the sanction policy on benefit fraud and the sentencing guidelines to this message. In the sentencing guidelines, you need to scroll down until you find the category of "benefit fraud" otherwise you will be reading guidelines for other types of fraud, which are different.

 

In addition to the criminal case, the department will seek to recover all monies overpaid via the civil route.

sentencing guidelines.pdf

sanction-policy.pdf

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you were at the IUC I am assuming that the claims were in your name. I then get a bit confused as to when your husband worked and when payments changed from your bank account to his.

 

Are you saying that the benefit was paid into your account until he started work in 2002, who changed the payments over to his account. You will have had to sign a form giving a change of bank account details.

 

The fact that you have signed paperwork without reading anything isn't a defence. Its your claim, its your responsibility to make sure its correct.

 

Depending on what you said during your interview it may be that a decision is made to interview your husband as well. If he has completed the claim forms and payment went into his bank account he can be charged with aiding and abetting, or knowingly allowing someone to make a false benefit claim.

 

Either way, the documents that they hold relating to his work will be sent to a decision maker, they will decide whether or not an overpayment has occurred and a calcualtion will be made.

 

If the overpayment is in excess of £2,000 (which I am guessing that it will be) then the case will be referred for prosecution. You should also be aware that if the overpayment is over £10,000 that a referral will be made to the financial investigators who will consider whether or not to press for compensation under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

 

If the court decide that you have sufficient resources then an order could be made by that court that you realise the funds from your property to repay the overpayment within a given time period.

 

I know that this wont put your mind at rest, but whatever happened is done. It needs to be sorted out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you were at the IUC I am assuming that the claims were in your name. I then get a bit confused as to when your husband worked and when payments changed from your bank account to his.

 

Are you saying that the benefit was paid into your account until he started work in 2002, who changed the payments over to his account. You will have had to sign a form giving a change of bank account details.

 

The fact that you have signed paperwork without reading anything isn't a defence. Its your claim, its your responsibility to make sure its correct.

 

Depending on what you said during your interview it may be that a decision is made to interview your husband as well. If he has completed the claim forms and payment went into his bank account he can be charged with aiding and abetting, or knowingly allowing someone to make a false benefit claim.

 

Either way, the documents that they hold relating to his work will be sent to a decision maker, they will decide whether or not an overpayment has occurred and a calcualtion will be made.

 

If the overpayment is in excess of £2,000 (which I am guessing that it will be) then the case will be referred for prosecution. You should also be aware that if the overpayment is over £10,000 that a referral will be made to the financial investigators who will consider whether or not to press for compensation under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

 

If the court decide that you have sufficient resources then an order could be made by that court that you realise the funds from your property to repay the overpayment within a given time period.

 

I know that this wont put your mind at rest, but whatever happened is done. It needs to be sorted out.

 

 

Hello

 

the original claim in 2002 went into my bank account until 2005 then he started to work and the benefit stopped into my bank, but he had phoned them up giving his bank details, and i thought we was ligitimate. He has already had 4 interviews over the past 12 months but he says no comment and they haven't issued him with a alergation.

 

Thanks for your help in this matter i will keep you posted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...