Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord wants to charge for re-decoration


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So I've recently moved out of a two bed flat, which was part-managed. When we moved out we paid for professional cleaners, and professional carpet cleaning at reasonable expense.

 

In the check-out report, under Decor it listed:

 

"Excessive black rub marks in several areas which need need to be removed or at least improved by cleaning."

 

with the following action required

 

"Possible need to remove or at least improve excess marks with cleaning, with charge to tenant. Tenant states that landlord intends to re-decorate so cleaning may not be required – Landlord please advise the agent if a deduction for cleaning should be made?"

 

Now it seems that the landlord and I got crossed wires at some point, as he said he was "considering" re-decorating upon inspection. However, in the belief he was going to do so and had planned to do so all along, we made no attempt at improving rub marks on walls prior to moving out.

 

He has since had it re-decorated, and wants to deduct £500 (the full cost) from the deposit. As the original report listed "light markings" in several places, re-decorating the flat would (in my book) qualify as an improvement on its original condition. Out of courtesy we offered half (£250), but he wants £350 due to a missing light bulb and a power socket that needed replacing.

 

Frankly I think we were overly generous in offering anything, but I feel I need further guidance on what my stance ought to be on this.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, hope I can help with this one. I spent 3 years managing residential lettings for a large Estate Agents for my sins!!

 

The Landlord is not entitled to 'betterment'. He can charge to put the flat back as it was but with due consideration for fair wear and tear.

 

The best way to work out what is fair is to ask when the flat was last decorated? Decor can be expected to last approx 5 years. If the flat was newly decorated before you moved in and you were there for 2 years and the decorating needed doing as a result of your occupation, then you could say that the Landlord was out of pocket for 3 years worth. Therefore he would be right to charge you 3/5 of the cost of redecoration.

 

However, you say that the flat was not 'perfect' when you moved in, so the Landlord has already had some 'life' from his decor. Therefore you really need some indication of how long ago the place was decorated and can do the sums to allow for this and your occupation as a proportion of the 5 years.

 

These are only guide figures but I know they are used by ARLA (Association of Residential Letting Agents) and if your case gets referred to them as a complaint, this is likely what will be used to assess it.

 

Who holds your deposit? Is it held by the Agent or a Tenants Deposit Scheme? If so then the Landlord cannot take any money from the deposit without your say so anyway. If the Landlord holds it then it should have been registered with a Tenants Deposit Scheme and you should have been notified of this at the start. If the Landlord failed to register it then I believe you can get all your deposit back plus a fine from the Landlord for breaking the law. I suggest you go to the TDS website and take a look at the rules.

 

If you cannot resolve your dispute then it can be referred to the TDS anyway. Talk to your Estate Agent about this, they can give you the forms.

 

The law was tightened up over tenants deposits some years ago to stop unfair practices by Landlords. I think what you offered sounded more than generous but ask to see invoices/receipts for any other works he is claiming for before you agree to it. The agent should be able to give you guidance on what is reasonable.

 

Good Luck.

 

This information is my opinion only and not legal advice and should not be construed as such.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for excellent reply.

 

To clarify a few points. The deposit is held by the agent, so there's no problem.

 

From what I've gleaned, the property was new in 2006 and hasn't been re-decorated since, so it's getting on four years since it was first decorated.

 

In any case, judging by your comments sticking to £250 seems fair.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are being very generous if the decoration is indeed 4 years old. It does also seem unfair that there was lack of communication to you about this, as personally I would have liked the opportunity to rectify such problems myself, without the LL assuming it would be ok to deduct from the deposit.

This very much sounds like an attempt at betterment from your LL, and I would even consider lowering your offer as far as say £100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...