Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC PPI - found letter cancelling


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What kind of stuff are you looking for ?

 

i'll do some more at the W/end

 

but initially i'm looking for any evidence that indicates HFC allowed payment of the 'montly' due amount by a 'paying in card' over the counter at local branch

 

i am also looking for evidence that the account number 'structure' for the personal loan account plus they offered was actually in the format of:

 

###-####-#

 

i had one for many years ending in nov 93, which they closed and forced me to convert to a 'normal' loan

they then totally denied me ever paying anything over the counter at the branch [which closed down and the staff were all let go - i believe internal fraud - but hfc hushed it up - shame i have their names and signitures!]

so i got fleeced to the tune of £3500+ over sev years of 'paying in' for it to go no-where.

never even had an agreement [because i was told it was a bank account - get me problems

 

btw: those docs you have posted are very useful already

 

dx

siteteam

sri 2 hi-jak

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Have received a reply from HFC; they have totally ignored the detail in my letter and have sent us what looks like a standard misselling PPI letter and questionnaire and requesting a reply within 10 days !. My initial thought is to totally disregard the questionnaire as we are not claiming for mis-sold but for PPI which was cancelledby us and the payments were not stopped by them !

Attached is the letter and stuff.

Any thoughts on this matter ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

about typical for this shower

anything to delay the process of giving people their moneyback.

 

i have never ever known hfc to say 'yes, sorry here is your money'

without pulling everytrick in the book to dis -hearten the claimer and make them give up.

 

don't!!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As dx says, do not give up on claiming back what you are due.

 

I suggest you fill in their PPI form and refer them back to the answers in your letter to them.

 

Point out they have 8 weeks from the date after you sent your letter, which gives them xxxx time to provide a full and final response.

 

Failure to do so will result in a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service

 

Good luck

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have had a look at the form and it is not relevant to the complaint at all so am planing to send them this ?

Further to your letter dated xxxx in reply to my complaint about PPI insurance being added to my account without my permission; and despite a subsequent telephone conversation with a member of your staff, xxxxxx and a letter to the same that the insurance was not cancelled and was subsequently charged through the life of the loan.

You appear to have sent me a standard letter and questionnaire which relate to the mis-selling of PPI. These do not appear to be relevant to my complaint which is that despite my requesting the cancellation of the Payment Protection at the start of the loan it was not cancelled and therefore I am reclaiming the Payment Protection paid over the life of the loan together with interest.

I enclose for your information a copy of my letter dated XXXX together with its enclosures. For your information I have highlighted the paragraph detailing my complaint as well as other relevant sections.

I look forward to receiving a reply to this letter within the next 10 days.

Do you think it will do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well - struggled through the questionnaire and finally decided that it was not relevant to our complaint. So sent them this letter (see attached). Received their response yesterday (attached) and it looks like they are trying to lump us in with the whole misselling "hold" basket. This reads like a very standard letter.

In our opinion we weren't mis sold the insurance - they added it without asking and then when we cancelled it by letter they neglected to do so.

Now they have said that if we aren't happy that we can go to the Ombudsman but I'm not sure ?

Can I gave your opinions on where next ? Court, Ombudsman; I am planning another letter to them to try and get it through their heads about what the complaint is really about.

 

Have just spoken to the ombudsman and they are saying business as usual but even though I have the hold letter I still have to wait the eight weeks to refer it to them; but suggested another letter while I waited. They also said that I can go the Ombudsman then Court route but not Court then the Ombudsman route ?

Thanks

Edited by gettingsorted
Link to post
Share on other sites

yep well i knew HFC would pull that string

i've got three with them since jan 2009

all now with FOS

 

spoke to him 10 days ago and he said that claims in the pipeline should be honoured and that for them, its business as usuasl

 

but we all know what HFC are like

 

customers last, lets wriggle and wriggle until we can either make the customer give up and or find another way not to pay customers back what is rightly their they have been fleeced of over the last 25yrs.

 

disgusting company.

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As expected no further response from HFC and as I have another ten days or so to wait to refer to the FSO thought I would follow the Complaints Procedure they kindly enclosed in their first letter and write to the Chief Executive !

I have seen on another thread that it is David Budd can anyone confirm ?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...