Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SAR too late??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry reposting as I was in the wrong place...We have a small family run business that has been hard hit by the recession and seen our income reduce by over 50%. I have 5 creditors who I have communiacted with at all times regarding our situation and with the help of the CCCS we have set up a token payment for them all, in fact 2 have put us on a severe hardshiplink3.gif scheme. Only one of them wanted to take this further and took me to court for a ccj, (strangly enough it is the one we owe the least too just £5,100) this was awarded and I was told I must pay an increased amount of £18.00. I have paid this religiously and have all the receipts since that court case. They then went for a redetermination: We had a court hearing and I was asked could I pay in full I told the judge this was impossible, and I feared any further increase would upset our others creditors and the arrangement we have in place with them. The DJ said 'i sympathise but you can see these people cant wait 30 years for their money' He agreed to them applying for a charging order. This is due to be heard in 2 weeks and I am scared. The loan was taken out over 5 years ago and what I neglected to tell the judge (due to nerves) is that for the first 3 years I paid £50 a month payment protection plan to safeguard myself, almost £2000 for nothing!. As soon as things fell into hardship I applied for help with the PPIlink3.gif and was told it was no longer appropriate as I was no longer paying the full ammount?? (I had never missed a payment before that) This cannot be fair?? I now know I should have not admtted to the full amount at the first hearing but in times of stress I dont think I knew what I was doing. I also have this loan in my sole name and my partner is joint owner of our home, which is in negative equity. I just would like some help on how to approach the hearing and what, if anything to send in advance, Some one suggested sending a SAR is this possible just 2 weeks before having originally admitted the debt, which I regret but didnt understand. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi badger220987

 

A SAR gives the creditor 40 days to send you all the data they have with regards to your account. The main reason that people send a SAR request is to request statements for the account so they can claim back all the

Penalty Charges on the account with interest for the last 6 years plus. People also claim back PPI if it's been mis-sold. I think you've mistaken a SAR request for a CCA request. A CCA request gives the creditor 14 days to respond with a True

copy of your CCA. If they fail to provide a copy then then you can put the account in dispute.

 

With regards to the charging order here's some info on charging orders and how to stop a charging order. The link is for info only, not a recommendation.

 

http://www.insolvencyhelpline.co.uk/debt_factsheets/charging_orders_in_the_county_court.php

 

There is a lot you can do to regain control, it might seem tough, but it is possible. Others will advise too.

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

 

So send a CCA Request to all your creditors,

Reclaim all Penalty and PPI charges with interest. The PPI must of been mis-sold, did they just add it or did you ask for it.

Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

They added it on I did not ask for it. Thank you for explaining about the SAR If I send this to the people taking us to court (which is in 2 weeks) how does this alter the court hearing, what do I need to say to the DJ?

 

I am objecting to the CO on several grounds

a) we are in negative equity

b) I thought I had made provision for the possible loss of earning with PPI Which i have paid out almost £2000 over 3 years

c) the debt is in my name and not my partners

d) We have 4 other creditors who we owe more too and they have accepted a token payment and frozen interest and charges

 

Do you think I have a case and how should I add this SAR to my list of objections?

Many thanks Clare

Link to post
Share on other sites

badger220987

 

Move the pointing arrow over the 'subject access request' words in your post above. The SAR Request would not help your case, it just means that you are requesting information , but you could say to the judge that you've requested statements from the creditor so you can claim mis-sold PPI charges back.

 

You really need to stick to one thread.

Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get a copy of the T&C for the PPI, it appears to me that this has been mis-sold due to the fact you were self employed and the policy probably is worthless regardless of what payments you were making.

This loan will be halved when the PPI PLUS interest has been refunded.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...