Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jim Riddles Claim


jim40031
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6537 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have another thread in teh Nat West Action group if anyone is interested.

 

They have charged me £330 in Unpaid Direct debit fees since I opened my account just over 3 years ago.

 

I sent my "preliminary approach for repayment" letter on the 17th March.

 

Judith Harris (Case Manager) replied on teh 21st March apologing that I have had to contact them about charges on my account, and letting me know that she will let me have a response or update by no later than 18th April 2006.

 

Karl Voller (Customer Relations Manager) then replied on teh 24th March with what I am led to believe is teh standard letter disagreeing with my legal anaysis. As a gesture of goodwill he is wiling to refund a proportion of teh total amount of unpaid and paid referral fees (dont think that I have any Paid referral fees as teh account does not allow me to go overdrawn) which amounts to £160.

 

I have today (27th March) sent teh letter, previously used by user Enigma (Title "50% offer").

 

Will keep you posted on progress.

 

Keep your fingers crossed for me please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received letter Saturday from Karl Voller (Customer Relations Manager).

 

"Thank you for yor letter dated 27 March.

 

I am very sorry to learn that you feel my offer of refunding £160 worth of charges is unnaceptable. After due consideration I still believe that this offer is fair and reasonable and whilst I sympathise with the problems you have faced I can confirm that I am not willing to increase my offer.

 

I appreciate this is not the response you were hoping for, however I hope I have clarified our position."

 

Now I know from reading the forum that I now have to move forward and start getting nasty. However I have a quick question :-

 

My second letter to them recognising their offer and giving them another 14 days was actually dated and sent as soon as I had there first response of 160 quid, and not when my 1st 14 days had expired. Should I sent another duplicate letter now that the original 14 days has definatley expired ???

 

Also the 2nd 14 days which was given earlier than should have done has also not yet expired. Should I wait until the 2nd 14 days expire in case they had a change of heart or should I recognise their response as the time to move on to teh next step ??

I hope that I havnt screwed this up. Please assist if you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sent the original LBA, then it would have said "...if I don't hear from you in 14 days, OR I do not get a satisfactory answer within 14 days..."

 

They wrote to you within your timetable, and their response was unsatisfactory. You have gone ahead with your next letter as you stated (2nd letter before action...) - they will know that you are not such a walkover...good luck.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"...if I don't hear from you in 14 days, OR I do not get a satisfactory answer within 14 days..."

Yes but my concern is that this statement can be read as "you can send as many unsatisfactory answers as you want but as long as I get what I want within the 14 days then I wont take it any further"

 

Do you see where I'm coming from ?

 

I'm just concerned that they could use this against me in court, i.e. I havent given them enough time and not shown willing to be reasonable.

 

Cheers Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 days is more than adequate time for a bank with their vast resources. No judge would say this is not enough time.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do apologise for keep posting but I'm not sure whether I have made myself clear or not.

 

Basically my first letter gave them 14 days. They responded much quicker but without a good enough answer so I wrote back with teh second letter before the 14 days had expired.

 

They have now responded to my 2nd letter, again within my 14 days but, again without a decent enough response.

 

My simple question I suppose, is should I wait until my 2nd 14 days expire (just in case they changed their minds) or should I go straight onto teh next stage, simply becuase they have answered my letter.

 

So as to save all of your time, a simple "now" or "wait a bit more" response would suffice.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wrote them two letters, each giving 14 days for them to respond. This they did, and opting to refuse your claim for a full refund. You are now completely in your rights to proceed with the next step - ie. issue your claim through the court, and this is what I would personally do.

 

However, if you wish to wait until the 14 day deadline, that is completely up to you. If you do choose to wait, then I would suggest you become fully au fait with the next step - once you have isued your claim, they will probably say that they are going to defend. In all likelihood they will back out, but once the court claim has been raised, you MUST be prepared to answer your case to a judge. Good luck.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait the 14 days. It looks more reaonable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to taking my case to court (if neccessary). I will take great pleasure in taking the smile off of this banks face. I will wait the full 14 days though as it seems to be fair.

 

The longer this goes on though the more agitated I am getting and teh more people I am passing this news onto. Basically they could cut their loses by paying out and letting me forget about teh whole thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically they could cut their loses by paying out and letting me forget about teh whole thing.

I'm sure that this thought has occurred to them many times...but they are more likely to be thinking...'if we mess people around they may just give up and go away...' Most of us on these boards won't be doing that...so the bank better start thinking of a Plan B...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning All,

 

Just quick question, There time is up, time to stop sending polite letters.

 

In the Moneyclaim guidance notes, teh 1st sentence that has been used in teh example is "You have a contract with the defendant bank dated XXXX ".

 

What does this date refer to....The bank account application date, teh account openeing date, todays date ????

 

Cheers for your time.

 

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Sorry for not replying sooner. Its when the Bank has acknowledged the claim against them that was issued to them via teh court. Basically by acknowledging the claim, the bank gets another 14 days to file a defence before, you can request teh court to issue judgement by default against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean that you have received a defence?

 

If so we would be interested to see a copy. Any chance that you could scan it to

 

[email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I have not received one, my claim has just been updated to say that it is defended and teh following text is shown when I go into teh deatisl of my claim :-

 

"You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly."

 

P.S. when and if I do get my money back I will be donating 50% of the interest to this site. I see that teh site hasnt managed to get much financial backing from us users yet, even though we all know that we wouldnt have seen any of our money at all if it wasnt for the time and effort of teh people organising this great web site. I beg anyone reading this to consider doing something similiar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about the donations the other day and was goin to stick in half of my interest but I messed up the interest so will be donating £50 anyway as they have helped a lot.

 

I think if everyone donated even 2-5% of the money they get back that would be a hell of a lot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for jumping on Barclays hater, heh thats not fair I want your name ;-)

 

I am hoping for something similiar. If so, then I already have my speech to the judge worked out. When and if it gets to this stage, win or lose, I will give the site a copy of my speech.

 

Moderators, please dont remove Barclays Haters post becuase of thread jumping, as this will be of great use to me.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6537 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...