Jump to content

jim40031

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About jim40031

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. This topic was closed on 03/07/19. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  2. This topic was closed on 03/07/19. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  3. This topic was closed on 03/07/19. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  4. I dont know everything about this "step aside" by any means....Thank Goodness. If you get tied up in it then you really should read that thread, particurly the Abeey National one. That chap really went through hell and back. Anyway, I feel that it is probably fair to say that at first we all thought that as soon as Judgement was given by default against teh defendant then we were quids in.....Well, as confirmed by my court, life is not quite so simple. The defenedant can apply for set aside, which basically means that they still want to defend, but must give a reason for not defendin
  5. There is much talk at teh moment about the banks requesting "set - aside" once the judgement has already been issued against them and a warrant is requested by the claimant. From brief chats that I have had with one of teh moderators it seems that the banks do this on a pretty much 100% basis nowadays, on teh notion that they can tell the courts that they never received teh paperwork. This practice is obviously very devious and gives me an even lower opinion of the banks in question which as far as I'm aware is all of them, as they are basically attempting to ridicule our British court sy
  6. Its happened, it's actually happened. Thankyou to all moderators and everyone else who inputs there comments to this site. My warrant has been fulfilled. Basically this means that the bank have sent a cheque to teh courts for the full amount. For some strange reason teh courts have to hold onto teh cheque for 2 weeks but I trust them ;-) This will make such a difference getting this money back, it really will. My donation will be made as soon as my cheque is cleared. The courts tell me that I will get the cheque on teh 2nd or 3rd of August. Whoopee !!!!!!!!!
  7. Have received a court date now of 28th September 2006 at Birmingham.
  8. Hi my old thread seem to have been removed for some unknown reason but never mind. Basically the situation is as follows :- Got my statements sent to me. Sent first letter requesting money back, recieved standard letter back saying no becuase they are fair. Sent second requesting my money back, received standard letter back saying no becuase the charges are fair. Claim was Issued on the 11/05/06 Judgement was Issued by Default on the 31/05/06. No response from NatWest (Defendant) so I have requiested a Warrant on the 30/06/06. Does anyone know how long it will now
  9. Hi All its the 12th of June today and I have still heard nothing from Nat West. Has anybody any idea as to how long I wait before requesting the court to do something about it, or how long it usually takes for the bank to send the cheque ?
  10. Judgement requested by default on 31/05/2006
  11. "They said leave it blank, so i'd be interested to know if it makes any differance." Did they mean leave the whole thing blank or just dont add an extra page, if you did add "other information" I would be very interested in the sort of things you wrote.
  12. Hi, Section G of teh Allocation Questionnaire says :- "In teh sapce below, set out any other information you consider will help the judge to manage or clarify the claim, including any other information you consider should be supplied by teh other party" Now I feel that providing my bank Statements would be useful, but also feel that seeing as barclays section 3 of Barclays defense says :- "The defendants standard terms and conditions gives teh Claimant a fair and transparent view of those terms and the charges applicable for unauthorised borrowings" etc etc etc , it would
×
×
  • Create New...