Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital One and FTP


Snappie37
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4997 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Pretty new around here but having taken lots of c*** from banks and other institutions I've decided to start fighting back, including reclaiming charges, now I'm looking for a little advice on this.

 

I am in arrears on a Capital One credit card. I have written to them (already told them I will only communicate by post!) and made a reasonable offer of monthly repayment. They have ignored the offer but have now written to me saying that they are no longer dealing with my account but have transferred it (their words) to FPC, a dca.

 

What's the best advice on what I should do next? Has anyone had dealings with this company and what should I expect?

Edited by Snappie37
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go:-

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter

 

Don't sign the letter, print your name or use the digital signature on here, capquest are one of the worst for harassment, if they do ring, tell them that you are making notes of the number of calls they are making and then put the phone down and send them the harassment letter from the debt collectors library.

 

They have 12 + 2 days to comply with your request for a true signed copy of your agreement after which point the account will be dispute.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Miss Muppet and Craigbadger.

 

I will get off the cca today. Yesterday I received a big yellow card inside an envelope from FPC. In big letters across the card it said "Address Confirmed" and then lots of bumf about them confirming that I lived at my address...not that I ever said that I didn't!!. Obviously its an implied threat to send someone to the door..:)) I've already written to them telling them to only contact me in writing, using the template letter.

 

I also had a TWO letters from Capital One. One from Graham Robinson replying again to my offer of payment and simply saying that the debt was now with FPC and one from Sven Lagerberg regretting that my PPI on the agreement had been cancelled by me...but I didn't do that, THEY did, when they terminated my agreement. Is this normal?!!!

 

Btw, when the debt was passed to FPC, should I have received any sort of notice of assignment?

 

I'll keep you up to speed with developments...and thanks again for the advice, much appreciated!!

Edited by Snappie37
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Miss Muppet and Craigbadger.

 

I will get off the cca today. Yesterday I received a big yellow card inside an envelope from FPC. In big letters across the card it said "Address Confirmed" and then lots of bumf about them confirming that I lived at my address...not that I ever said that I didn't!!. Obviously its an implied threat to send someone to the door..:)) I've already written to them telling them to only contact me in writing, using the template letter.

 

I also had a TWO letters from Capital One. One from Graham Robinson replying again to my offer of payment and simply saying that the debt was now with FPC and one from Sven Lagerberg regretting that my PPI on the agreement had been cancelled by me...but I didn't do that, THEY did, when they terminated my agreement. Is this normal?!!!

 

Btw, when the debt was passed to FPC, should I have received any sort of notice of assignment?

 

I'll keep you up to speed with developments...and thanks again for the advice, much appreciated!!

 

 

Yes totally normal behaviour for Crapquest but who are FPC? Have to say thats a classic name Sven Lagerberg. Yes you should have had a letter of assignment from the original creditor, a nail in their coffin. Might be a good time to do a Subject Access Request, £10 and don't sign and this goes to the OC. Well done dealing with this so far and we're here if you need us. By the way when you get a copy of the agreement use a free photoimaging site such as photobucket so the peeps on here can give their opinion as to enforceability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Miss Muppet, it is FPC, not what I put in the title, sorry :((

 

There has been no letter of assignment, just letters from oc and FPC to say FPC are now looking after this account.

 

I sent off the cca today to DCA, let you know when I get a reply.

 

So Sven is well known?!!..really odd to get a letter that was almost sorry that the PPI was cancelled when it was CapOne that caused it to be cancelled!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sven isen't well known to me:D I just think it sounds like a made up name, but then most of Capquest's are (I know yours is a different DCA - where are they based BTW) they have a person called Barry Davis who is constantly on holiday or in a meeting when Caggers who have been issued with SD's call to tell him they are going to get a set aside!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Heylo,

 

I would be sending letter 20 from here:

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

Just make sure the 12 working days have passed since they received the request

 

Also, it doesn't matter that Cap1 cancelled the PPI. If it was mis-sold to you in the first place, you can get it back.

Have you sent Cap1 a SAR yet?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I should send this to FPC? The last letter from Cap 1 said that the whole account had been transferred to FPC and was no longer in their hands.

 

I haven't sent an SAR to Cap1 yet. I was first waiting to see what the response to the CCA would be...and the answer to that is nothing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I should send this to FPC?

 

Yup

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just when I said it had gone quiet I had a letter on Saturday from Sven Lagerberg, "Head of Executive Response Centre" (!!)

 

This says that Cap1 are "looking into my situation and will do everything they can to get an answer to me within four weeks"...!!!!

"If for some reason our investigations take longer than four weeks we'll contact you and tell you why this is.."

 

Don't they realise they have a statutory time to reply? ...or is it that they simply can't find my original application form?? I originally applied around 2003.

 

Sent off letter 20 as suggested and I'll keep you all up to date with developments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

Any update on this?

I am stuck in a very simliar situation involving both companies

 

I have been issued with a default notice 3 days ago, and saying Capone will be passing my details on to a DCA

then recieved a text yday from FTC

 

I rang Capital one who didnt want to take payment and said to me Capquest will be in touch

 

I missed 3 months payments due to falling on hard times,

I havent yet recieved written communication from FTC or Capquest, just calls from FTC which I answer and hang up

 

I have started a thread but no response yet

can you advise what I should do next

I opened my capone account in 2002

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...