Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Notice how Kev goes about his scam.  In Kahunaburger's case they left the car park well before the time shown on the ticket they had purchased.  But because Kev added on the time taken to look for a parking spot and queue to pay/try to get an internet signal he still sent them an invoice. So If you had left before the Justpark message, say at 3:55, Kev would still have managed to turn that into a stay of 4:06 and thus an overstay and an invoice. Unfortunately for Kev, judges have ruled against his reasoning.  Have a read of this famous case  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html  
    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
    • Car Finance Awards celebrates best of the industryView the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is my PPI too old to claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After my first post I have decided to go for the claim on my own. I have no paper work (from egg) and I am now a bit concerned that the PPI was added before 2001. If this is the case can i still make a claim? The reason for my claim is many fold, I had a condition at that time where i was taking Prozak, I was self employed and I was told I had to have PPI. Your help is gratefully recieved

Link to post
Share on other sites

these is no time limit

re:limitations act 32c

'when you became aware'

 

your only issue might be paperwork, if you have not got the statements

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks px, i telephoned one of the claims comany's and they said that if the ppi was added before 2001 i would not have a claim.

I am a bit worried but going to go for it. Iam as close to the end of a rope as my tether. I think i paid about £4k and I am really struggling

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh nasty claims companies

rip off!!

 

do it yourself soo much cheaper

and with realtime free help!!

 

the best thing i can say to you

is read some threads

then read some more threads

then read again.................:D

 

there are lots of stickys on this groups homepage

notes for claimants is one

 

take your time there is NO RUSH

 

if you've not got all the statements

i'd fire off the PPI SAR you'll see listed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, and I apologise for stating the wrong name. I really am going for it. I wish I could navigate the site better but I'll get used to it i'm sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well scroll right up the top

and look for the ble underlined

Payment protection insurance [PPI] bit

click that

and thats our homepage

scroll down a page or two

and you'll see the stickys

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx, it seems that claiming from egg has been easier since their big fine sometime ago. I will write for the access request today, sadly I haven't got a cheque book, hopefully i can pay on my debit card?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no send a blank PO

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no blank

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, one or two last things, i have downloaded a letter template for the SAR. Should I ask for everything or should i only request the payments made for PPI? Is there a preffered letter template? there seems to be a few around.

 

Once again I am grateful for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

see previous post in this thread line. I asked the same as I was told by one of the 25% comany's that I wouldn't have a claim if my ppi was added before 2004. 'dx' tells me there is no timescale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

see previous post in this thread line. I asked the same as I was told by one of the 25% comany's that I wouldn't have a claim if my ppi was added before 2004. 'dx' tells me there is no timescale.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are we talking about a claim for mis-selling or a claim on the insurance ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm what dx stated - its six years from thedate you became aware of misselling.

 

If its a loan ppi, Egg pay out quite quickly (I only stated my self employment), if its a card then they tend to dig their heels in a bit more.

 

Even tho' they paid out on a loan account very quickly when I started a claim against an Eggy card they refused point blank.

 

I had to go to the FOS, who upheld my complaint and told egg to cough up, this is where you need to be aware of Egg tactics.

 

1) They only paid out premiums + 8% simple interest and stated that they cannot refund more than six years (my card opened 2001 & closed 2006 - they calculated back six years from March 2010).

 

2) After reminding them of the Limitations Act (as dx quoted) they very quickly refunded the balance of the premiums only & apologised stating they misunderstood the FOS directive.

 

3) Blatantly refusing to refund the contract compound interest (about £1,500) stating that I signed the FOS acceptance form for what they refunded, total rubbish! you have to sign the FOS acceptance form before the FOS instruct the bank/credit to cough up.

 

Where am I at the moment - Stalemate, complaint back with the FOS regarding interest - case handler cant believe EGG refuse to refund the interest, I have to supply FOS with all statements so they can doublr check my figures :? If necessary it WILL go to court.

 

FOR WARNED IS FOR ARMED ;)

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

This claim is for PPI on credit card and I have several reasons for believing it was mis sold (health, self employed and told i had to have it when i requested a higher credit limit)

To be honest I am in fanancial difficulty and although I want everything I am entitled to just the payments back for now would help 10 fold. I had aquick calc last night and believe its about £6.5k for payments without interest. As you know egg do not supply paper statements unless requested while the account is active. They expect you to use the internet. I need to get the SAR off today. How long do you think it could take without the bun fight regarding interest. Or is that like asking a china mans height?

Any way thanks soooo much for your time and help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

This claim is for PPI on credit card and I have several reasons for believing it was mis sold (health, self employed and told i had to have it when i requested a higher credit limit)

To be honest I am in fanancial difficulty and although I want everything I am entitled to just the payments back for now would help 10 fold. I had aquick calc last night and believe its about £6.5k for payments without interest. As you know egg do not supply paper statements unless requested while the account is active. They expect you to use the internet. I need to get the SAR off today. How long do you think it could take without the bun fight regarding interest. Or is that like asking a china mans height?

Any way thanks soooo much for your time and help

 

 

They rejected my claim against an eggy card very quickly, I think it was within 10 days & stated it was their final response so I went straight to the FOS, from there it only took about three months - however as I stated earlier they point blank refuse to refund compound interest.

 

If they offer you anything you can always inform them that you accept it in 'Part Settlement', but wait for their cheque to clear before telling them that. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

use the sar template in the sticky's in this forum.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. The template you attached is the one that I am using already. So just to confrm that i do not need to mention Mis Sold PPI at this stage? This template only states disproportionate penalties and charges and my need for the SAR is to calcualte my payment total in PPI

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

sorry that one is ok

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...