Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In the earlier thread (now linked above) you were going to change your name by Deed Poll. Did you do that? Did it solve any of your problems? What, exactly, have you been charged with? Has a court date been scheduled? I cannot think of any reason why the police would tell you to pay your Ex's debts that she incurred 5 years before you met her. Either there's lots of the story you aren't telling us, or you have misunderstood what you have been told, or you are trolling us. Earlier you said it was your Ex who wanted you to pay her debts and, for some reason that  no-one here could understand, you were going to do so. So your Ex can give you all the details of her debts and you can pay them. She can hardly expect you to pay them if she won't give you the account details! I've never known debt collectors be fussy about who pays as long as someone does. They routinely take payments from friends and family to clear debts. It's not illegal to pay someone else's debts          
    • What you've said isn't helping. Please post up a redacted version of the appropriate section of the court papers.  HB
    • Oh, yeah. The law I’m charged with is riding underground without a valid ticket said by SJPN Student Union can’t provide any help, I have contacted them
    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Needed!!


Isobel Daly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My claim was deemed to be served on the 2nd August. I hd a photocpy of Acknowledgment of Service with intent to defend by Cobbetts LLP. No signature or name of person responsible. My calculations show they have to the 30th August to defend. Is this true? I haven't had any correspondence as yet from anyone. My MCOL has 'started' in the status box. Do I wait a couple of days extra?

 

Thanks for all your help todate.

 

Isobel

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have filed for a default this morning as now 29 days over Cobbetts time limit. On the claim it asks do I want to claim other interest to date can anyone tell me how to add interest from 28th July 2006 to date? Is there a template to do this?

 

Thanks

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was online to make judjment and my MCOl froze. Logged in again and the judjent has been halted they have put in a defence today. 1 day late. Spoke to MCOL they have deffered defence to my local court. How long till I get their defence and wha happens next. Anyone!!!!!!!!!!

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

cobbetts always wait until the last moment, they did it to me time up on a saturday yet they filed the defence on Monday. They have 24 hrs after the 28 day to file a defence even if you have entered a default earlier, the defence takes priority!! dont worry you will get a court allocation questionaire this link will explain. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Is there any benefit to sending the AQ back to the court immediately or should I wait until near the last date for filing? Also have spotted a mistake on my spreadsheet that was originally sent to NAtwest. Can I send an ammended version to the court with AQ? I saw someone had done this and it was OK am I the only stupid person out there?

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there all,

 

Sendind CPR response to Cobbetts.

 

Having a bit of a mare!!!!!!! Lost my original spreadsheet with interest calculated. Can i send the list of charges with a subtotal and the total for interest added at the bottom. If I change the one I have done it changes the days from offence to today's date. This is not appropriate. Am I totally stupid? Probably........

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there all,

 

Sendind CPR response to Cobbetts.

 

Having a bit of a mare!!!!!!! Lost my original spreadsheet with interest calculated. Can i send the list of charges with a subtotal and the total for interest added at the bottom. If I change the one I have done it changes the days from offence to today's date. This is not appropriate. Am I totally stupid? Probably........

 

i am a little unsure what you mean:?: When you get judgement or a settlement interest is calculated upto that day. as long as you have the charges and interest amounts it should be fine. plus cobblers will settle before this gets to court!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being a bit vague today. I have a total for all the charges on a spreadsheet but not an accumulated total of interest worked out day by date, and a total of the interest owed via. the online calculator at 8%. Total charges 3630 between Nov 00 and Jul 06. Interest looks like 1495.53 does this look right? Interest seems a bit high to me. Any thoughts....

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being a bit vague today. I have a total for all the charges on a spreadsheet but not an accumulated total of interest worked out day by date, and a total of the interest owed via. the online calculator at 8%. Total charges 3630 between Nov 00 and Jul 06. Interest looks like 1495.53 does this look right? Interest seems a bit high to me. Any thoughts....

 

mmmm it does seem a bit high try this spreadsheet.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

For mine i didn't put any interest on at this stage. It is on the original documents that i submitted, and I specicified claiming interest on the form. They only asked for justification of the charges I'm claiming so I listed these to get to the figure "claimant is claiming XXX in charges" figure they wanted.

SNATCHWEST and NOBBETS no scare me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Plutos,

This is the response letter to the request for CRP saying not necessary as small claims but have attached schedule of unlawful charges - are we on the same track?

 

I thought that they needed this info as NatWest has not provided them with it.

 

its not really your job to provide information to them, the bank should be doing it for them.However you can provide some information as a goodwill gesture. read bigcols thread and letter he sent it is very good. :D it stopped cobblers contacting me regarding CPR 18

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

I decided to send my defence and request for them to complete CPR Part 18 as did Bs0lth. They sent full payment to her within 14 days. Bit long winded but thought it may be a bit different and wanted to see if it made a difference. Going with AQ to court today. Is it scary?

Hunbun;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done - you go for it. It will be really interesting to see what result this has!

 

Hi there,

I decided to send my defence and request for them to complete CPR Part 18 as did Bs0lth. They sent full payment to her within 14 days. Bit long winded but thought it may be a bit different and wanted to see if it made a difference. Going with AQ to court today. Is it scary?

SNATCHWEST and NOBBETS no scare me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Isobel,

 

I'm about at the same stage as you. I sent off a letter to Cobbetts saying that I didn't have to comply with the CPR request, and just attached my original spreadsheet and an updated version with the extra interest added since the claim started. Have got to get my AQ in by Saturday (left it until the end to see if I got anything back from them beforehand - but the silence is deafening.

(Knowing how much lawyers charge, and the amount of claims they must be dealing with, Natwest must be paying them a small fortune. You'd think it would be easier for them to settle up straight away and save us all this aggro!)

 

Hopefully we won't have to wait much longer to get our cash - and i can then start another claim for the charges they have done me for since I put the first claim in!!

 

Roger:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...