Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help Neede With PPI Claim Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I applied online for a credit card years ago, and I figured that if I chose the PPI insurance, that I would stand a better chance of being accepted.

 

The upshot was, I was accepted. I was self employed at the time, and I never once claimed on the insurance.

 

This card has obviously now defaulted and I was wondering if there was anyway I could ask them to refund the PPI element bringing the amount I owe down.

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I have absolutely no idea on how to approach this. At the time of applying for the credit card online, I felt that I should apply for the PPI as my chances would be greatly increased of being accepted, as I was self employed at the time.

 

I have paid a total of £456.62 dating from April 2006 until February 2008 - this figure does not include any interest.

 

Does anyone think I have a chance of getting these charges back?

 

If so what would be the best way of approaching this?

 

The OC says that I would have been covered as I was self employed and that they cover that eventuality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, letsdothis.

 

I'm going to move this thread to the PPI Forum, have a look at the 'stickies' there, I'm sure you being self-employed is a good enough reason.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep no problems

 

have a look at:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/61081-ppi-some-notes-claimants.html

 

and other stickys at this forums home page

 

dx

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

.....

dx

Edited by dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

Thanks Saintly, and also DX for the suggestion.

 

I have checked the stickies, and they suggest that PPI would be mis-sold if (these would apply for my instance)

 

 

  1. You were not asked whether you had any other insurance which would cover the loan (This was an internet application) I honestly cannot remember if the PPI box would have been ticked as Yes as default or not. I certainly don't remember reading anything telling me that I had a choice etc as to if I had any other insurance.
  2. You were not told you could buy PPI elsewhere to cover the loan - As above
  3. You were not in work or self employed at the time of sale - I was self employed at the time.

As for point 3, I mentioned this to Cahoot on the phone yesterday, and they stated that self employed people would have been covered.

 

Now the thing is where do I go from here?

 

Reading a few threads on here, it would appear that when you claim, they ask you to fill in a questionnaire, and the standard reply to that, is that they should have that information already.

 

I have all the amounts and dates, but I am really struggling to work out the format of my letter, as well as adding the contractual interest to these figures. The 8% is easy to do as that was on the spreadsheet.

 

Could anyone please guide me through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't worry about proving it was mis-sold

just fire off the usual letter

STOP speaking to these muppets on the phone too

they'll talk you out of it and are already preparing their first runaround letter now.

 

Compound interest calculator

 

is the best one to use.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't worry about proving it was mis-sold

just fire off the usual letter

STOP speaking to these muppets on the phone too

they'll talk you out of it and are already preparing their first runaround letter now.

 

Compound interest calculator

 

is the best one to use.

 

dx

 

Sorry - I had to speak to them to tell them that they had in fact sent the wrong subject's data, and that I was forwarding it on to the the Chocolate Fireguard Commisioner, to add to my complaint.

 

tbh Cahoot are quite easy to speak to and not pushy at all. And from all the contact that I have ever had with any creditors, they are the most willing to help. (on the phone anyway) Albeit wrongly.

 

As for talking me out of anything, absolutely no way. Letter for charges reclaimed sent Wednesday, they signed for it Thursday. Friday, letter asking for the PPI goes off recorded delivery as well.

 

I have no idea how to use the compound calculator, so I have asked for the PPI payments back, plus subsequent interest that I would have been charged, plus 8% the courts would award. Once I get the rebuttal, I will then try to work out the compounded rate and then add the 8% on top.

 

Thanks again for your help.

Edited by letsdothis
Link to post
Share on other sites

:D

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PPI claim has now gone off, recorded delivery and I gave them 8 weeks to conclude or I would report them to the FOS

 

I also now realise that adding the compound interest makes a huge difference to the amount. I only calculated at 22% as well.

 

I should have added to my first letter the fact that I wished to claim for compound interest in my credit card charges refund request. If I have worked this out properly, with all the charges and all the PPI refunded including compound interest, I could have wiped more than 4/5 of the debt out. :eek:

 

Is it too late to add compound interest to the charges and ask them to repay that as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to stop you at all

you are entitled too it and p'haps they might just refund it without you asking.....

 

you are entitled to be re-ebursed as if the charge or ppi had never been charged.

then you are entitled to 8% stat int because you have been deprived use of the money, and that the FOS guidelines.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

What do you think?

 

Send a new request for repayments of the revised charges with a statement of charges showing the compound interest and the 8% as well, or wait for their reply to the first letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they should do it for you.

lets wait and see.

 

it wont hurt

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

If they do not include the compound interest at 22% what is the best method to actually achieve this?

 

Would it be a case of going to court, or to the FOS?

 

If it is the FOS I believe I would have to wait for their final response?

 

As you have stated it is in the FOS guidelines, is there anywhere that is actually written so I can use in future if they start getting funny over both claims?

 

I did have a browse before but could not find anything relevant to that information.

 

I would just like to be fully prepared as regards to the claim for charges. I am trying to compose another letter ready to be sent in 12 days, if there is no satisfactory response to my original request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Cahoot received the LBA today, let's see who blinks first now.

 

Santander blinked first.

 

I have had a letter this morning telling me that they are sending me a cheque within 28 days for £400 odd. Unfortunately they have only included 8% interest and not the compounded interest, which means that this amount is only half of what I had originally asked for.

 

What do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

write back and state that the fos guidelines upon the methods used to reimburse customers reclaiming mis-sold ppi policies indicates:

 

'the customer should be placed back into such a financial position 'as if the PPI policy never existed on the agreement in the first place', this is to include [where necessary] any interest that has been charged on the PPI amounts'.

 

'the customer is also entitled to 8% statutory interest in addition to this figure, in restitution of being deprived of this monies'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

write back and state that the fos guidelines upon the methods used to reimburse customers reclaiming mis-sold ppi policies indicates:

 

'the customer should be placed back into such a financial position 'as if the PPI policy never existed on the agreement in the first place', this is to include [where necessary] any interest that has been charged on the PPI amounts'.

 

'the customer is also entitled to 8% statutory interest in addition to this figure, in restitution of being deprived of this monies'

 

dx

 

Hi Dx

 

Does the above apply to default charges / late payments?

 

This is the claim for the charges and not PPI - Cahoot still have not responded to that claim yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they have added cc interest to the charges then yes.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Unbelieveable.

 

Cahoot signed for my PPI reclaim letter in June 2010 and Royal Mail shows this. I rang them today on their free phone number, (why should I pay) 0800 7317774 and they deny all knowledge of ever receiving it. Just like they did with the SAR I sent Recorded Delivery as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...