Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello dx100uk, After months of waiting for a response I finally got a reply and I must say it was the worst 4 months of my life the - fear of the unknown. So, they wrote back and said I was in the wrong BUT on this occasion they  would not take action but keep me on file for the next 12 months. It. was the biggest relief of my life a massive weight lifted -  I would like to thank you and the team for all your support
    • I have contacted the sofa shop who are sending someone out tomorrow to inspect the furniture. I suspect if anything a replacement will be offered although I would prefer a refund. Few photos of the wear in the material, this is how it was delivered.  
    • Yup, for goodness sake she needs to stop paying right now, DCA's are powerless, as .  Is it showing on their credit file? Best to use Check my file. All of the above advice is excellent, definitely SAR the loan company as soon as possible.
    • Hi all, I am wandering if this is appealable. It has already been through a challenge on the Islington website and the it was rejected. Basically there was a suspended bay sign on a post on Gee st which was obscured by a Pizza van. The suspension was for 3 bays outside 47 Gee st. I parked outside/between 47 & 55 Gee st. I paid via the phone system using a sign a few meters away from my car. When I got back to the car there was a PCN stuck to the windscreen which I had to dry out before I could read it due to rain getting into the plastic sticky holder.  I then appealed using the Islington website which was then rejected the next day. I have attached a pdf of images that I took and also which the parking officer took. There are two spaces in front of the van, one of which had a generator on it the other was a disabled space. I would count those as 3 bays? In the first image circled in red is the parking sign I read. In the 2nd image is the suspension notice obscured by the van. I would have had to stand in the middle of the road to read this, in fact that's where I was standing when I took the photo. I have pasted the appeal and rejection below. Many thanks for looking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This is my appeal statement: As you can see from the image attached (image 1) I actually paid £18.50 to park my car in Gee st. I parked the car at what I thought was outside 55 Gee st as seen in image 2 attached. When I read the PCN issued it stated there was a parking suspension. There was no suspension notice on the sign that I used to call the payment service outside number 55 Gee st. I looked for a suspension notice and eventually found one which was obscured by a large van and generator parked outside 47 Gee st. As seen in images 3 and 4 attached. I am guessing the parking suspension was to allow the Van to park and sell Pizza during the Clerkenwell design week. I was not obstructing the use or parking of the van, in fact the van was obstructing the suspension notice which meant I could not read or see it without prior knowledge it was there. I would have had to stand in the road to see it endangering myself as I had to to take images to illustrate the hidden notice. As there was no intention to avoid a parking charge and the fact the sign was not easily visible I would hope this challenge can be accepted. Many thanks.   This is the text from the rejection: Thank you for contacting us about the above Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). The PCN was issued because the vehicle was parked in a suspended bay or space. I note from your correspondence that there was no suspension notice on the sign that you used to call the payment serve outside number 55 Gee Street. I acknowledge your comments, however, your vehicle was parked in a bay which had been suspended. The regulations require the suspension warning to be clearly visible. It is a large bright yellow sign and is erected by the parking bay on the nearest parking plate to the area that is to be suspended. Parking is then not permitted in the bay for any reason or period of time, however brief. The signs relating to this suspension were sited in accordance with the regulations. Upon reviewing the Civil Enforcement Officer's (CEO's) images and notes, I am satisfied that sufficient signage was in place and that it meets statutory requirements. Whilst I note that the signage may have been obstructed by a large van and generator at the time, please note, it is the responsibility of the motorist to locate and check the time plate each time they park. This will ensure that any changes to the status of the bay are noted. I acknowledge that your vehicle possessed a RingGo session at the time, however, this does not authorize parking within a suspended bay. Suspension restrictions are established to facilitate specific activities like filming or construction, therefore, we anticipate the vehicle owner to relocate the vehicle from the suspended area until the specified date and time when the suspension concludes. Leaving a vehicle unattended for any period of time within a suspended bay, effectively renders the vehicle parked in contravention and a Civil Enforcement Officer (CEO) may issue a PCN. Finally, the vehicle was left parked approximately 5 metres away from the closest time plate notice. It is the responsibility of the driver to ensure they park in a suitable parking place and check all signs and road markings prior to leaving their vehicle parked in contravention. It remains the driver's responsibility to ensure that the vehicle is parked legally at all times. With that being said, I would have to inform you, your appeal has been rejected at this stage. Please see the below images as taken by the CEO whilst issuing the PCN: You should now choose one of the following options: Pay the penalty charge. We will accept the discounted amount of £65.00 in settlement of this matter, provided it is received by 10 June 2024. After that date, the full penalty charge of £130.00 will be payable. Or Wait for a Notice to Owner (NtO) to be issued to the registered keeper of the vehicle, who is legally responsible for paying the penalty charge. Any further correspondence received prior to the NtO being issued may not be responded to. The NtO gives the recipient the right to make formal representations against the penalty charge. If we reject those representations, there will be the right of appeal to the Environment and Traffic Adjudicator.   Gee st pdf.pdf
    • Nationwide Building Society has launched an 18 month fixed-rate account paying 5.5%.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

insolvancy advise beneficial interest


lillboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

is he going to lose his house.

my uncle purchased his propoerty under the councils right to buy scheeme with one of his nephews.

the nephew has now been declared bankrupt. my uncle has recieved a letter from the insolvancy service which is refering to transfer of the interest of the nephew half of the property. i have read the letters and it seems they do not want to evict my uncle but want him to buy the other half.

he has no money and does not know what to do

please could anyone give any advise.

Thanks lillboy

 

 

 

Bogus Charges £499.00 LBA 1/06/06

Refund of £299.00 now sent Data Protection Act:)

 

GE Capital NEXT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

Unless he buys his nephews beneficial interest the answer is more then likely yes.

 

If the official receiver is handling the bankruptcy, he should contact the official receiver. They may be able to take part in a property conveyancing scheme run by The Insolvency Service and a firm of solicitors.

 

Under this scheme, the beneficial interest can be transferred back to him, or the beneficial interest.

 

Please note they will have to pay:

 

For a solicitor or licensed conveyancer to act for them in the transaction;

  • £211 (as at August 2005) to cover the official receiver's legal costs. This amount must be paid in advance. It includes an allowance for expenses that may be incurred in the transaction. If the allowance is not fully used, they will receive a refund;
  • the cost of an independent valuation unless you already have a very recent independent valuation of the property;
  • the agreed purchase price for the beneficial interest based on the valuation. If your home is now worth less than the amount you still owe on it, the price of the beneficial interest will be set at £1.

They will also have to give the official receiver up-to-date details in writing of the amounts that would be needed to fully pay off the mortgage and any other charges on the property.

 

If your husband, wife, partner, relative or friend cannot afford the costs of the scheme at present, they may still be able to take part later. They should contact the official receiver about this.

 

If, later, they approach the official receiver to buy the beneficial interest, and the property has increased in value, the purchase price is likely to be more than £1.

 

If the home is mortgaged, the lender may have to agree to the sale - the solicitor or licensed conveyancer dealing with the transaction will be able to advise on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

What is beneficial interest?

 

 

House Value

 

Open Market Value £100,000

takeaway

Money Secured on the House.

 

Mortgage £50,000

Secured Loan £20,00

 

Total Money Secured on the House £70,000

equals
Beneficial Interest

 

House value takeaway Total Money Secured on the House = Beneficial Interest.

 

£100,000 - £70,000 = £30,000

The £30k would be between all the owners so in the eg above 2 owners would mean each have a Beneficial Interest of £15,000 and this is what the Insolvency Service will look to recover to realise their interest in the property.
Link to post
Share on other sites

as far i i know the realistic value of the property is around 90K

his mortgage is for 34K with 1.8K in arrears, with a court hearing set for later in the month

 

90-34-1.8 = 54.2

 

therfore the insolvany firm would want £27,100 from my uncle.

plus he would have to pay the outstanding mortgage.

 

looks like he will be looking for a new council house.

Thanks lillboy

 

 

 

Bogus Charges £499.00 LBA 1/06/06

Refund of £299.00 now sent Data Protection Act:)

 

GE Capital NEXT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Zooman

Hi options are this:

 

  1. Get someone else to buy his nephews beneficial interest and own half the house.
  2. Rise £27k from a loan (possible a second charge).
  3. Remortgage at £65k to cover all areas.
  4. Contact IS and inform them he wishes to sell the house and put it on the open market and walk away with his share of the beneficial interest (27k) in his pocket.
  5. Do nothing and let IS sell the house and bear the costs he will get a chq for his beneficial interest but IS is famous for selling under value to get a fast sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

It now appears that the nephew only has an interest in 30% of the property, but has failed to contribute to any of the mortgage payments for 6 Months, My Uncle is going to Seek legal advice on whether or not he has any claim to any of the property due to not making any payments. my uncle has contacted the bank to arrange to pay back the arrears in mortgage payments.

 

The letter from the Insolvency Service does not State a specific percentage of ownership should my uncle make a statement in the letter of achnowledgment of thier letter.

 

Thanks LillBoy

Thanks lillboy

 

 

 

Bogus Charges £499.00 LBA 1/06/06

Refund of £299.00 now sent Data Protection Act:)

 

GE Capital NEXT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am a Conveyancer and would advise you to get your uncle to obtain advice from a Solicitor asap.

When they purchased the property they would have stated how they were to hold the property, there are three way of doing this - Joint Tenants 50% share to 50% share, where if one person dies the share automatically vests in the other owner, Tenants in Common - 50% -50%, however upon the death of one party the share can be divided by way of a will, or Tenants in Common in unequal shares, where one person owns a higher percentage of the property. Also if one person had a higher interest in the property or put more funds in to purchase then a Declaration of Trust should have been drawn up, to cover the person who had invested more, to secure those additional funds.

The problem with a joint mortgage is that both parties are liable for payments, however if one person fails to pay then the second person is still liable.

It may be worth contacting the Solicitors who acted at the time of the purchase to obtain a copy of the documents so your uncle knows his legal stance.

 

Do go and obtain legal advice however.

 

Hope he manages to sort it out.

 

Claire

Halifax plc - £1600 WON - received

Halifax plc - £925 WON - received

Halifax plc £370.00 WON - received

 

Yorkshire Bank - £1290 WON - received for boyfriend

 

Back to sort out Credit File and get back on track!

 

HAVE FAITH AND KEEP GOING :p

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...