Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

O2 Default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

After try to apply for a mortgage on 24th may, found out had an old O2 default on my report this was from 16/9/04 after speak with o2 my curent balance is £0 but on credit report is £391.

 

I have informed O2 that this contract was taken out in Scotland so is subject to scottish law and under the prescription and limitations (scotland ) act 1973 should be removed after 5 years, but o2 now keep quoting that they have loaded in onto credit report as per DPA & information commissioners. Can anyone please advise as to how i can get this default off asap. or am i stuck with it until 16/9/2010 when the 6 years are up.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

Defaults stay on your credit reference for a statutory Six year period unless removed with the creditors prior written permission, although a debt can be legally considered Statute barred in Five years (Scotland) the default is a different matter these stay for a fixed Six year cycle unless it was

 

(A) Placed unlawfully or.......

 

(B) You get the required permission to have it removed earlier.

 

© Although the debt is considered SB after Five years in (Scotland only) you would need written acknowledgement that this is considered the case, before you were able to apply to the credit agency for it's early removal.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scott

 

thanks for the reply. so if i can get O2 to agree its SB can i then apply to the credit agenncies to have the default removed.

 

Thank you for your e-mail sent 25 May 2010.

I’m sorry to learn that your credit file has had adverse information applied to it. I can appreciate the frustration this is causing.

I have looked into your query and we are unable to remove the entry you refer to from your credit file, as this shows an accurate record of your payment history.

Your invoices for Invoices 14 July 2004, 26 August 2004, 14 September 2004 and 16 September 2004 were not fully paid within 14 days. We sent reminders on 2 and 10 November 2004. O2 is not responsible for the receipt of correspondence.

O2 are legally bound to load an accurate record of the payment history of an account and if a bill is not fully paid with the 14 day terms of the contract, late payments will load automatically, leading to a default after six months. These details remain on the credit file for six years from the date of the settlement or default -whichever occurs earlier. I understand that you dispute this because you refer to Scottish laws however, as you’ve previously been advised, we load information as per the requirements of the DPA and Information Commissioner.

Can anyone advise from the above if the default date should then have been 14th july 2004 and not 26/3/2005 as O2 have it at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just ben informed by O2 they had sold the bedt onto a 3rd party but since 2004/2005 i have never been contacted by O2 or any 3rd party requesting any payment.

 

what can i do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found out that this was sold onto Robinson Way some time in 2006 and that in 12th Dec 2006 they lettered me about this but the letter was returned as i had moved in Aug 2006. My credit report has been upto date sine 2006 is there anything that can been done. Its O2 and not \robinson way that have the default on my credit report so O2 have known all along about my new address.

 

Cheers Stu

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

can anyone advide on the below from o2 stating in 2004 it was legal to add default after 9 months and not limited to 6 months

We load defaults after 6 consecutive months of non payment.

The default has been loaded after the 6th month (so in affect the start of the 7th month). The default date shown on your credit file is correct, and as such I am unable to make any amendment. Legally speaking in 2004 we were entitled to load a default up to 9 months after termination of the account.

As I stated though during that period (up until 2006) we loaded default up to 9 months after the account terminated – hence the March default date.

You are correct applying the logic that if we loaded after 6 months then it would be January. But the loading after 6 months started in 2006 (from what memory serves). As the default was loaded in 2004 we were allowed to use the 9 month period; as such the credit file loading is correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've been advised by another Mod, you'll be stuck with it, even tho' it's statute barred it still remains on your credit file for six years.... it's not seen as 'enforcement'.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scott,

 

i understand the 6 year rule, what i was challanging was the 6 - 9 month limit for the addition of the default and even at 9 month is not set at the right date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default should have been dated when the a/c became delinquent and is supposed to be registered within three to six months. You could complain to O2, the Credit reference agencies & the ICO but by the time anything is done it would have more than likely dropped off your file anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...