Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant as an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unsure whether I can claim?


Daley
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6456 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have been following with interest how people are claiming back money which is rightfully theirs, however, I have a slightly different problem. Up until about 18 months ago Id always banked with NatWest, and although Id never had much money in my account, (and had incurred a few charges), all was well. Id taken out an unsecured loan with the bank to consildate all my other debt. Anyway, Ive since defaulted on that loan, moved my account to Lloyds and Im about a year into an IVA! As things stand I owe NatWest roughly £15k, which I am slowly clearing through the IVA, albeit at a reduced monthly rate.

 

My question is, can/should I try to claim any money back from the bank charges I incurred during my time with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes im sure there are other people on here trying to do the same thing and as i understand it they have done it. Its like a snowballing affect which has got you into a worse situation. I can't see any problem in claiming back what is rightfully yours.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was just wondering about the knock-on effect. IE, would NatWest just demand immediate payment of what I owe them, as opposed to knocking any charges I reclaim off my bill?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

The answer is possibly but there is no direct policy of account closures as a direct result of claiming charges. If the account is overdrawn and has had consistently been charged then that may be something that the back will state to you but by already having a parachute account already opened this should not be a worry at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

NatWest seem happy enough with what Im currently paying them through my IVA, which is about £175pm, instead of the origional repayments of about £300pm. I could probably claim back a decent sum of money that they`ve over-charged me in the past....but wouldn`t want to do so if it means they`ll either insist I start making the full payments, or worse still demand the lot? Id prefer to know before I started any proceedings as I dont want to anger them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I nearly went through the process of an IVA but was lucky enough to be bailed out by my father - as far as i can remember isn't an IVA a legal agreement?. I am no expert but in my opinion - if it is, they have no grounds to change the agreed repayments. The only thing that i can recall from my experience is that if you have any kind of windfall during your repayment period i think you have to declare it to them either to pay it off your debt or re-asses you repayments which may mean giving the money straight back to them but it will at least reduce your payment time. Please don't take my advice as cast iron as like i said i am no expert but it may help you in the right direction.

regards

Mat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again i just found this on the first IVA website i could find through google :

 

What is an IVA?

An IVA is an agreement with your creditors to make a single reduced payment each month which lasts for a sensible period of time (normally 5 years). Once agreed, creditors are not allowed to add further interest or charges to your accounts by law. The agreement is fixed - meaning that creditors can not randomly demand changes to it. The arrangement is governed by the Insolvency Act of 1986. A common misunderstanding is that people think undertaking an IVA is like going Bankrupt. This is not the case. The IVA is specifically designed to avoid the many issues and stigmas surrounding Bankruptcy.

 

Hope this helps

Regards

Mat

 

P.S they are unlikely to break a legally binding agreement because you have charged them with illegal conduct as it would draw attention to their illegal activities

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...