Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Equifax, - stop processing me automatically


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sent a section 12 notice on which they recieved on the 21st August, reply dated the 25th - remember a section 12 notice requires them to stop automatic processing of my information.The letter is as follows, (get a cuppa)Dear Mike 220359,Thank you ......Re: Searches,I acknowledge yor request for Equifax to prevent lenders from searching your Credit File however I would like to advise should you apply for Credit (yeah like!) with a company it is necessary for that company to carry out a Credit Search therefore as a CRA Equifax must provide this information and can not prevent any company from accessing your information automatically. However, to stop this automatic process, you can add a Notice of Correction, which causes your file to be manually reviewed.Re: Notice of Correction,A notice of correction is a service available to you within the CCA 1974 section 159. This is an explantory statement of up to 200 words written by you. What you say is up to you, but bear in mind that Credit Lenders are looking at your Credit Report to help them decide whther to lend you money etc. Any lenders searching your file in the future will see and be able to consider the content of your statement.Equifax can refer your Notice of Correction to the Office of the Information Commissioner for adjudication, if we think it is incorrect, defamatory, frivolous, scandalous or is for any other reason unsuitable.Should you wish for me to add a Notice of Correction please complete the enclosed...form.Re: Credit FileAnticipating you may wish to view a copy of your personal Report I have now arranged for a complimentary copy of your Credit File to be sent out to you, which you will recieve under a seperate cover. Once you have recieved this, if you have any qyueries please contact our Credit File Advice Line on 08700-100583 (the hell I will, phoning you will give you money!), and they can discuss any queries that you may have.Re: DisputeOnce you are in receipt of your Credit File, if you beleiev any of the netries are factually incorrect we have a disputes team who can investigate this further for you.If you would like us to (I'm getting bored now!) investigate any entries on your behalf, please complete the enclosed Notice of Dispute form, and return to the above address.............Once we are in receipt of your completed dispute form we will contact the supplier concerned to verify the accuracy of the details we hold and will add a notice to your Credit Report to show that the entry is in dispute. Once we receive a response from the subscribing client we will inform you of the outcome.I trust that this is satisfactory...................please contact me at the above.Yours Sincerely,Angela Sludds (printed signature)Escalation Advisor-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Well there it is, a very obtuse letter with elemental syntax errors. I shall go away and have a think about my reply (which will be posted on here), but the crux of the reply will be 'I gave you until the 29th August to comply with my request that all automatic processing of data, can you confirm that this has happened, if not letter to the Information Commissioner I'm afraid'One subtle nuance though is the implied legal obligation to provide information to potential lenders viz 'as a CRA Equifax must provide this information and can not prevent any company from accessing your information automatically' The letter is also contradictory in that it goes onto say 'However, to stop this automatic process, you can add a Notice of Correction, which causes your file to be manually reviewed.'As I said a very obtuse letter.Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry this hasn't come out to well so I'll try to re dit it.Sent a section 12 notice on which they recieved on the 21st August, reply dated the 25th - remember a section 12 notice requires them to stop automatic processing of my information.The letter is as follows, (get a cuppa)Dear Mike 220359,Thank you ......Re: Searches,I acknowledge yor request for Equifax to prevent lenders from searching your Credit File however I would like to advise should you apply for Credit (yeah like!) with a company it is necessary for that company to carry out a Credit Search therefore as a CRA Equifax must provide this information and can not prevent any company from accessing your information automatically. However, to stop this automatic process, you can add a Notice of Correction, which causes your file to be manually reviewed.Re: Notice of Correction,A notice of correction is a service available to you within the CCA 1974 section 159. This is an explantory statement of up to 200 words written by you. What you say is up to you, but bear in mind that Credit Lenders are looking at your Credit Report to help them decide whther to lend you money etc. Any lenders searching your file in the future will see and be able to consider the content of your statement.Equifax can refer your Notice of Correction to the Office of the Information Commissioner for adjudication, if we think it is incorrect, defamatory, frivolous, scandalous or is for any other reason unsuitable.Should you wish for me to add a Notice of Correction please complete the enclosed...form.Re: Credit FileAnticipating you may wish to view a copy of your personal Report I have now arranged for a complimentary copy of your Credit File to be sent out to you, which you will recieve under a seperate cover. Once you have recieved this, if you have any qyueries please contact our Credit File Advice Line on 08700-100583 (the hell I will, phoning you will give you money!), and they can discuss any queries that you may have.Re: DisputeOnce you are in receipt of your Credit File, if you beleiev any of the netries are factually incorrect we have a disputes team who can investigate this further for you.If you would like us to (I'm getting bored now!) investigate any entries on your behalf, please complete the enclosed Notice of Dispute form, and return to the above address.............Once we are in receipt of your completed dispute form we will contact the supplier concerned to verify the accuracy of the details we hold and will add a notice to your Credit Report to show that the entry is in dispute. Once we receive a response from the subscribing client we will inform you of the outcome.I trust that this is satisfactory...................please contact me at the above.Yours Sincerely,Angela Sludds (printed signature)Escalation Advisor-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Well there it is, a very obtuse letter with elemental syntax errors. I shall go away and have a think about my reply (which will be posted on here), but the crux of the reply will be 'I gave you until the 29th August to comply with my request that all automatic processing of data, can you confirm that this has happened, if not letter to the Information Commissioner I'm afraid'One subtle nuance though is the implied legal obligation to provide information to potential lenders viz 'as a CRA Equifax must provide this information and can not prevent any company from accessing your information automatically' The letter is also contradictory in that it goes onto say 'However, to stop this automatic process, you can add a Notice of Correction, which causes your file to be manually reviewed.'As I said a very obtuse letter.Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish Should these agencies really be in a postition to ruin peoples lives. The notice tells them to stop using your data period.

 

The only problem & it's a big one is the chocolate teapot ICO will not enforce the laws of this land.

 

Lets mount a campaign against the so called regulators & their repeated failure to protect the consumer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the court not an option to seek and order forcing them to comply unless they can show good reason why they shouldnt, as if! Similar in the way you can apply to court to force them to comply with a SAR under the DPA.

 

GLenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, you could go to each individual company supplyin any adverse credit, bad entries for automated requests, taking all the bad but leaving the good on your file??

 

Which is also what I have suggested previously. :D

 

I just think it's the much better option :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair play to you all.

 

Well that was the only reply I had from any of the CRAs so I'm going to do what I promised a letter of complaint to the IC, you have to do what you threaten.

 

Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...