Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas - Electric - Unexpected bill for £2000 plus wrong meter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

Thanks in advance for reading.

 

Back in November I received a bill from British Gas (electric) for £1943.14. This came to me as a bit of a shock as I pay everything my DD and really had no cause to believe things were out of control. Then I noticed that the bill was a "Your First Electricity Bill". I have lived here for years. Then I looked into it a little. Apparently they had been charging me for Gas and not electricity since 14th Nov 2008. Now blow me down for not noticing this, I feel like a bit of a fool but even so, my bills used to be £25.50 a month and this is for a period of 12 months, the numbers dont add up.

 

Now I have another problem in that the council won't give me a key for the meter cupboard for the building I live in. To gain access I have to call my landlady and arrange an appointment. I am away ALOT and this can sometimes take three weeks to work out.

 

So I finally get into the meter room, photograph every meter in there and call BG. None of the meters match the serial number BG have on record for this flat. Furthermore, the only 'actual' meter reading on the bill is for 17th March and is for '00000'. The bill for that month is 5712 units (£656.35).

 

When I first spoke to them they said they would drop about £500 and updated the bill. I said this was not good enough. Now they want me to read my meter whilst turning everything in the flat on then off so I can figure out which meter is mine, then they want me to read it again in two weeks so I can get an estimation of usage. All this whilst maintaining they will cut me off in that two week period. (when I will be abroad anyway)

 

I am refusing to pay until I get a sensible bill as the one I have seems to be based on completely in-accurate information.

 

Any helpful advice appreciated!!!!

 

Thanks

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, write or email them to complain and state that the debt is in dispute. This will therefore call off any debt collection action in line with OFT and Ofgem guidelines.

 

Ask them to arrange for one of their field reps to come out and do a load test (by turning the meter off and then on basically) to establish which meter is yours - not fair on you having to do all this leg work!

 

By taking readings a week or two apart this will therefore make a good estimate of what your opening meter read should be (use as little electricity in this period as you can).

 

BG cannot charge for anymore consumption than one year before the date of the first bill, under the Energy Retail Association Code of Practice for Accurate Bills. They should then offer you a further year to repay this amount and cover your ongoing consumption at the same time.

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops - mistake above there... They can only bill you for one year prior to the first amended bill. They are now aware that they have the incorrect meter details, they were advised that you moved into the property as they set up your gas account, this just "screams" billing code. Get a letter/email sent to them straight away and keep a copy for yourself

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had the council round so I took the opportunity.

 

I've done the burn test and figured out which meter is mine. The serial number and reading seemed to cause a hell of allot of confusion at BG. With that information they have put a stop on the account (not going to send me any red letters or cut me off) and will contact me in five working days. (oh any they actually admitted something had gone drastically wrong for the first time to date)

 

The one year thing is interesting and will be useful information when the time comes!! Thanks for that Nottslad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries, it is one year back from the date of the first bill with the correct details on it.

 

Is it a fairly new property? As new builds can often suffer from what is known as a "crossed meter" which is basically where the wrong meter details are registered to the wrong address, often a problem when the plot address becomes the postal address.

 

More information on the one year policy can be found on the ERA website, The Energy Retail Association - Customer Billing

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is very odd! If the meter had been changed and information not been received or something then fair enough, these things can happen but that is a bit strange!

 

Any idea as well as to why you were not billed? Bewilders me how BG get it so very very wrong sometimes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lack of bills stops everyone there in their tracks when ever its mentioned. Nobody can give me an answer and I've been asking the question on every phone call with them since November, either they don't know or wont tell me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Well its taken six months but I finally have contact again (so much for getting in touch in five working days).

 

After putting the account on hold it was apparently passed to an account handler who was then demoted back to the call centre, did no further work on it and refused to get back to me. One day the case got marked as resolved (still with the wrong meter serial number) and I got a bill. At the same time as the bill, and before the due date on the bill I got a phone call from a debt collection agency. Two weeks and several hours on the phone later I am again making progress. Please see emails below...

 

--------------------------

Thank you for your prompt email. Based on the readings and photos you have provided I have worked out and average usage between March and October of 5.59 units per day. I have used this in the calculation to work out a new start meter readings which I wish to agree with you as we have no actual reading.

 

Working back 2 and half years to 2008 when the account opened it gives a start reading of 64560 which is a difference of 5,100 units. To put this in to more perspective at the moment we are charging you for almost 16,000 units which as you can clearly see is quite a difference and would mean a large difference in cost.

 

If you are happy with this calculation and you wish for me to proceed with the process please let me know ASAP and I will contact the meter operators to start updating the systems.

 

Thank you for your time.

 

---------------------------

And the email he is replying to:-

 

-----------

Dear xxxxxxxxx,

 

Further to our phone conversation earlier today please find attached three photographs of my electricity meter. The file names refer to the date and time the photo's were taken.

 

The dates and readings are:-

68486 - 31/03/10

69312 - 16/08/10

69660 - 15/10/10

 

The meter serial number is:-

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Regards,

 

-------------------------

 

So any advice on how to reply to this?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...