Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is personal accident insurance waste of money or not?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am thinking of increasing my level of protection to accident as I cycle to work a lot.

I do not have a car or a house so I cannot get the cover under the related insurances.

Have been browsing around for a while for a decent product, and the payout isn’t that much either.

(I’m in my mid twenties, and am looking for round £200-250K if I lost my ability continue with my current career due to a serious accdient, i.e. if I lost a few fingers then I will be no good working in a lab.)

But some comments said they are pointless as they don’t pay out.

I have seen some policy provided by the banks at a cost of around £10 per month, but they only cover lost of total work ability.

I have contacted some brokers and they have quoted me policies that cost about £80 a month, as soon as I mentioned the polices I saw with a lower price, they will go away and never come back to me.

So I would like to know a few thing,

Is this type of policy a waste of money?

Is there much difference in purchasing the policy through a broker or a bank?

Any recommendation of a decent insurer? (I mean for one they won’t reject your claim when you really need it )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I can't see the point. If you are injured by a third party then you just claim off them.

 

You only really need it if you are going to injure yourself and is that going to be likely? Are you injury prone or a suicidal bike rider?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that happened that you should be able to make a Criminal Injuries Claim although that would be limited to £500,000. Is this too little?

 

Plus you could also make a claim through the MIB on the untraced drivers agreement which is not limited although you will have to pay an excess (can't remember how much).

Link to post
Share on other sites

If that happened that you should be able to make a Criminal Injuries Claim although that would be limited to £500,000. Is this too little?

 

Plus you could also make a claim through the MIB on the untraced drivers agreement which is not limited although you will have to pay an excess (can't remember how much).

 

Even if I dont know who the driver was?

If so, no wonder why people said it is a "pointless" insurance.

 

Can you think of any other situation where I might need it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, even if you don't know who the driver was or the car reg, you can still make a claim.

 

This explains it in more detail:-

 

Frequently asked questions about the Untraced Drivers' Agreements

 

The only cover I would consider getting is for serious illness. But that's my personal thoughts.

 

Thanks!

But for the untraced drivers agreements, I couldnt find any information of how much I can get if I had an accident with an untraced driver?

 

I just want to make sure it would cover everything I may need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't say an amount as it depends on what injuries you have and how that effects your income, ability to work and any disadvantage on the open labour market.

 

If you have a serious injury that stops you from working then you will be able to claim for your injuries and then on top of that you will be able to claim your loss of earnings and other associated losses such as care and assistance, equipment and/or property (i.e. bungalow if you need home without stairs etc), travel expenses, past and future medication costs etc etc....

 

Conversely, if you injuries are minor then you will receive a low award for damages.

 

There is no limit really as to what you can claim so long as you can justify it and have mitigated your circumstances.

 

The MIB have settled many large cases where damages run into the millions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...