Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS polled FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the and the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5176 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just need a quick bit of advice.

 

Just had the baillifs at the door (second visit, first time letter through door) asking for a lump sum payment for arrears, then a pament plan for the rest. I told them I didn't have a lump sum. Long and short is they've said they are having me committed to prison for non payment. Is this correct? I refused to pay immediately as I don't have a lump sum to give, and also on the grounds that the council will take the account back as we are on Jobseekers Allowance at the moment. Is this right too?

 

A bit concerned now, and not sure whether to ring the council and what to say, or what to do next really - he's given me his number in case I change my 'within the next seven days'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I'm a bit nervous tbh I've never been in this position before and although, thanks to this forum, I know a little (I didn't let him in the house for example) I just don't know what to do or say next. Feel like a complete idiot as I should have dealt with this before. So the council can take the account back and stop the baillifs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just need a quick bit of advice.

 

Just had the baillifs at the door (second visit, first time letter through door) asking for a lump sum payment for arrears, then a pament plan for the rest. I told them I didn't have a lump sum. Long and short is they've said they are having me committed to prison for non payment. Is this correct? I refused to pay immediately as I don't have a lump sum to give, and also on the grounds that the council will take the account back as we are on Jobseekers Allowance at the moment. Is this right too?

 

A bit concerned now, and not sure whether to ring the council and what to say, or what to do next really - he's given me his number in case I change my 'within the next seven days'.

 

The Bailiff is over estimating his powers in telling you he will have you committed to prison. This is a decision the Court will make at a Committal Hearing but only if you are wilfully refusing to pay. They use it as scare mongering tactics. He will bend your refusing to pay a lump sum as refusing to pay at all - if and when it is returned to the Council for further action.

 

As they have visited you twice then you are responsible for Bailiff fees for 2 Visits - £42-50 total providing he has not been able to levy on any goods. You are doing the correct thing by denying him any access to your home. As both bailiff & Council are not aware of your personal circumstances you need to do this ASAP - to this end I have already made someone more skilled than me aware.

 

For now you must batten down the hatches.

 

PT

  • Haha 1

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maggie moo,

Please don't worry yourself overly. The last place you'll be visiting is prison! I really don't like the way bailiffs instinctively try to bully and frighten people clearly on low incomes.

Whilst you have given a little information about your personal circumstances, am I right in assuming both yourself and your partner are on either Job Seekers Allowance or other benefit? Could you confirm any other benefits you may be in receipt of?

Once you have done that, a letter needs to be drafted detailing your vulnerable status within the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. This should be emailed to both bailiffs and council with hard copies sent by post signed for. I will help draft this if you require - but it won't be until I come back online this evening.

The letter will be notifying them that you are vulnerable, on a low income and requesting that the case is passed back to the council for attachment to benefits [in my case £3.50 per week]. You will need to send proof of benefits to the bailiff.

Please note that if you choose to phone the council there is every chance they will try to tell you there is nothing they can do. This is not the case.

Hope that helps for now...

Best wishes

Rae

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Have just had a very interesting coversation with someone from the council. Apparently they would have immediately taken the account back, but cannot do so because my partner claims JSA and is named, but the council tax bill is only in my name. He has advised me to e-mail the recovery department with the circumstances outlined for them to decide, but they don't have to apparently.

 

I've been told to inform the bailiffs of this when they return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Template Letter to Request Account be Referred Back to Council

 

With thanks to Tomtubby

NOTE: This letter can be adapted to suit your own circumstances and could be used to advise the company that you are in receipt of income support or income based jobseekers allowance and that you wish for your arrears of Council Tax to be deducted at source from your benefits and requesting that the account is returned back to the local authority. You should provide a photocopy if possible, of either your benefit book or confirmation of your entitlement from the benefits agency.

 

To: Bailiff Company

Date:

Dear Sirs,

Re: Account reference.

I refer to your letter dated
(enter date)
informing me that your company have been instructed by
(enter local authority)
to enforce a warrant/liability order etc against me, in respect of arrears of council tax.

In your letter you state that you will be visiting/returning to my home to
(seize/auction etc my goods.)
unless full payment of
(enter amount)
is made by return.

The purpose of this letter is to advise your company that I am in receipt of
(income support/jobseekers allowance)
and am enclosing as proof, a copy of
(payment book/letter from benefits agency.)

I am informed that deductions can be made directly from my benefits to pay my arrears of council tax. This is provided for in the Council Tax (Deductions from Income Support) Regulations 1993.

For this reason, I would like to request that this account be referred back to
(local authority)
so that the relevant forms can be completed.

I am also aware that once deductions are in place, Regulation 52 of The Council Tax (Administration & Enforcement) Regulations 1992 expressly forbids any enforcement action.

As I have now made you aware of
(my/our)
circumstances, and provided proof, if your company continues with enforcement action, I will consider making a formal complaint about the bailiff’s conduct to the County Court

Could you please confirm safe receipt of this letter, a copy of which is being sent to my local authority.

 

 

Yours Faithfully.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting better hunni.

The council are wrong.

The National Standards apply to the household.

 

Department for Constitutional Affairs - Enforcement - National Standards for Enforcement Agents

 

Those who might be considered vulnerable include the following:

the elderly;

people with a disability;

the seriously ill;

the recently bereaved;

single parent families;

pregnant women;

unemployed people; and,

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

 

This case should be sent back by the bailiffs - who are aware of these standards. Or taken back by the council who are also aware of these standards.

 

Will happily post up a letter template for you but, as mentioned earlier, it'll be later this evening / tonight.

 

Now you can certainly stop worrying. You have the moral high ground to make a formal complaint to the council. I'll help with that too if you like.

 

Best wishes

Rae

Edited by RaeUK
Thanks PT for the heads up...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all, and I understand what I have to do. My only problem is they are saying that they cannot attach to JSA as it is only my partner that is named on the claim, even though he claims for me, if you see what I mean. The bill is solely in my name.

 

Is this wrong? Could I ask for them to attach to my carers allowance? Sorry if I seem a bit thick but I'm a little confused :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maggie_moo, would you mind just letting me know what is wrong with your child? This is because I tend to include a link to the appropriate section of the DWPs A to Z of Medical Conditions. If you don't wish to post such information I'd understand.

Best wishes

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kelcou, he's Autistic, non verbal (at the moment but I've got high hopes he may speak eventually).

 

I'm going to do the letters tonight, been a bit busy to do them this afternoon, got myself into a bit of a panic after the bailiffs left and had visions of being hauled off to the cells :oops: We're just going to start making payments online from tomorrow so it can't be said we're not willing to pay. I shouldn't have let it get this far so it's my own fault really.

 

Anyway appreciate everyones advice, thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maggie_moo, if you are interested, here is a template for you. This one is just for the bailiff. You will need to send a seperate letter to the CEO of the council making a formal complaint. I'd hang fire for a day or two to let the bailiff respond. If they come back in a negative fashion then they are simply giving you more ammunition. As I said earlier, you have the moral highground.

 

......................

 

Dear Sir

 

Reference number:

 

I am writing with regard to the above account relating to Council Tax Arrears.

 

It would appear, from advice that I have received, my circumstances are classed as 'vulnerable' according to the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. The reasons for this are that my partner and I are both in receipt of Job Seekers Allowance and my son has Autism. He is disabled and the Department For Works and Pensions have awarded him Disability Living Allowance at the higher rate.

 

I will be contacting my GP in order to obtain evidence of my sons medical condition for you. This will be sent under separate cover together with evidence of our JSA.

 

In the meantime, please visit the following site for further information:

 

What is Autistic Spectrum Disorder? - DWP

 

As the current situation is having an aggravated and detrimental affect on him, I am requesting that the case is returned to the initiating Local Authority. Doing so would allow me to address the issue rationally and without fear, whilst putting in place an affordable and sustainable payment plan.

 

I also request that, in the interim period, no further visits be made to my home as they impact adversely on my sons health.

 

I would be grateful if you would please confirm safe receipt of this letter.

 

A copy of this letter has also been sent to XXX Council for their information.

 

Yours faithfully.

 

 

Please note: this correspondence is being sent by both electronic and conventional mail.

 

 

................................................

 

 

Feel free to use, amend or ignore the template.

If you use it, then email a copy to the bailiff company, hard copy sent by post signed for.

Email [optional] a copy to the councils Revenues Division. Hard copy and brief covering letter to the Head of Revenues at the council by post signed for.

You then need to get evidence in the form of a letter from your sons GP and any other NHS interface he has. Copy these, together with evidence of your JSA, plus a very brief covering letter to the bailiff firm and Head of Revenues.

Sit back and see what transpires...

 

 

Best wishes

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...