Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid Wages: Correct process


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5172 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I'm a bit confused about the correct process to follow when resigning because you haven't been paid wages in two months (although all other staff have and you know this because you process and pay monthly salaries).

 

I intend to get the money back through the employment tribunal therefore want to ensure that I get it right.

 

My reading is that I need to:

1. Send a resignation letter which clearly states that I feel I have no choice but to resign with immediate effect. (i.e. constructive dismissal?)

 

He (my boss) did give me a che1ue for the first unpaid period on THursday, but at quarter past three (banks closed at half three) - he told me to go to the bank of another employees first as this had to be processed that day and repeated that I was not to go to my bank until I had deposited money in his account too - that employee is not in arrears, it is only me. The clear inference being that I, despite having been unpaid since late January payment (11th February), am in no way important or a priority. Do I need to state this as 'last straw'. The company has been a little short on cash but only because, for e.g. he tsf electronically at least 1k/week to himself and takes the cash from teh till (and again I know this because I do the accounts but it is - outside of being unpaid - possibly none of my business - it is his company):eek:

 

Does the letter constitute a step 1 letter?

 

I need help desperately as from my reading, I would compromise my position if I did go into work just to wait until the cheque cleared. I'm expected at the office in the morning - should I call in sick.

 

Any and all help gratefully appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I'm a bit confused about the correct process to follow when resigning because you haven't been paid wages in two months (although all other staff have and you know this because you process and pay monthly salaries).

 

I intend to get the money back through the employment tribunal therefore want to ensure that I get it right.

 

My reading is that I need to:

1. Send a resignation letter which clearly states that I feel I have no choice but to resign with immediate effect. (i.e. constructive dismissal?)

 

He (my boss) did give me a che1ue [cheque] for the first unpaid period on THursday, but at quarter past three (banks closed at half three) - he told me to go to the bank of another employees first as this had to be processed that day and repeated that I was not to go to my bank until I had deposited money in his account too - that employee is not in arrears, it is only me. The clear inference being that I, despite having been unpaid since late January payment (11th February), am in no way important or a priority. Do I need to state this as 'last straw'. The company has been a little short on cash but only because, for e.g. he tsf electronically at least 1k/week to himself and takes the cash from teh till (and again I know this because I do the accounts but it is - outside of being unpaid - possibly none of my business - it is his company):eek:

 

Does the letter constitute a step 1 letter?

 

I need help desperately as from my reading, I would compromise my position if I did go into work just to wait until the cheque cleared. I'm expected at the office in the morning - should I call in sick.

 

Any and all help gratefully appreciated.

 

He gave you a cheque for the first unpaid period...

 

Does the amount on the cheque cover the entire period?

 

How long have you been working for your employer?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for responding.

 

I've worked for the company around one year now although there is previous history with an entity that went into liquidation. For the last six months he has paid everyone on time and me late - getting progressively later but usually before the middle of the next month. However he has not paid me for February and March except:

 

Payment for February was given to me in the cheque I refer to in initial correspondence. I need this cheque to clear as financially things are very tight. I do not believe that he will start paying me on time as his attitude seems to be - it doesn't matter for this employee. I do believe that he has breached contract and that there is no way I can trust him not to land me in this situation again.

 

I have not initiated a grievance partly because I don't think I can do both (leave because of breach of contract and initiate grievance, save for instigating a tribunal hearing in order to recoup money by sending letter - step 1 - giving 28 days to respond?). I cannot afford to work and not get paid and therefore feel I have no option but to resign.

 

Many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

a) you worked there around a year... more than a year or less than a year?

 

b) do you hold proof of staff being paid on time and you late?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...