Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Domestic & General


askus2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3017 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ow forgot to add that my now rebooked appointment for June 12th - which I was never told about - should never have been booked either! I had to push to get him to check that this date was correct or this would have been another wasted day waiting in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh how I wish I'd read this thread a long time ago. Having been a policyholder of D&G's kitchen policy for over 10 years, I am only now making my first claim for a Hotpoint / Indesit fridge freezer that has stopped working properly. After 4 visits, the Indesit engineer finally threw in the towell and said that he would authorise a replacement unit. After countless and expensive phone calls to D&G, they simply hide behind the fact that they can't do anything until they hear from Indesit. After countless and expensive phone calls to Indesit, I get passed from pillar to post, always promising that someone will look into it and call me back - which they never do. I can only imagine that D&G and Indesit are in cahoots with each other, and are working on the basis that eventually most customers will give up. I won't!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

You have my sympathy, we have had the week from hell with Domestic & General, the meile fridge-freezer stopped working on the 30 May, we phoned D & G that evening and were told to call miele the following morning. Miele said they couldn't get an engineer to us before tuesday 4 june , so all the food in the freezer perished as did the food in the fridge. As I was at the hospital on tuesday the 4, they re-cheduled for wednesday 5, but thankfully they were able to get an engineer to us on monday 3. The engineer quickly established the unit was a write-off and that's when the problems started. Miele sent the engineers report to D & G on monday 3, but I had to chase-up D & G from then on. They then told me we would have to pay a delivery charge of £64.03, if it was coming from carlisle to oxfordshire I could understand it, but we live two miles away from the miele factory! As I refused to pay it and asked why it was so much, I was told that miele had instructed D & G to charge us, which miele refuted, so I have kept phoning and demanding to speak to a manager, I was assured a manager would give me a call back, thankfully my badgering has paid off and our situation is resolved. I was called today by Angela Millward from D & G, she had been asked to contact me and resolve the situation, the £64.03 delivery charge has been cancelled and the replacement from miele will be delivered a.s.a.p. This lady was a delight to talk to and understood our situation and apologised to us, and made every effort to swiftly resolve the situation. I do hope you are able to get your situation resolved, these numbers for D & G should connect you without paying for 0845 numbers: 0208 946 7777, 0115 910 6500,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks, it's nice to know we're not suffering alone.

I must say, I didn't realise that one might have to pay a delivery charge in the event of a replacement being required. I'd always understood the "kitchenplan" to be an insurance policy, and that the principle of insurance is to put you back in the position you were in before the insured incident occurred. D&G seem to be loading the risk heavily in their favour, by clawing back additional expenses in return for settling the claim. Sounds like blackmail to me!

As with many things that appear a good idea at the time and then turn out not to be quite what they seem, it's finally occurred to me that this insurance is a rip off, unless you are very unlucky and happen to have a lot of things go wrong. That is of course what insurance is all about, but I calculate that based on the current premium, I shall pay a little over £2,000 over the next 10 years. I think I would rather put £17 a month into a piggy bank and take my chances!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Having Hotpoint group machines that are 10+ years old, having duly paid my insurance on them to D&G for my "Kitchen Plan", they are now breaking down. Because of their age, the engineers never have parts for them, requiring me to take a day off work for the engineer to do a diagnosis, and another for them to undertake the repair.

 

To have a machine "written off", it must be uneconomic to repair, or the parts are unavailable, or the repair takes more than 28 days to do. D&G say that this is up to the engineer. The engineer is not interested in saying it is uneconomic to repair, because they get paid for every repair they do. They say it is up to D&G to decide whether it can be repaired, or not.

 

There is no linked records showing D&G the number of repairs having been done, and the engineer appears to not have any records of all the repairs that have been done, so as long as there are parts physically available to effect the repair, they don't care how much time you have to spend having your appliance repaired. The "complaints" team understands my concerns about having to spend so much time getting the machines repaired, but as long as they can be physically repaired (no matter how often), they are going to do the repairs.

 

I have paid for my appliances several times over with insurance over the last 25+ years. The service provided has degraded enormously over that time, from when you could book an appointment for morning or afternoon, in advance to now, when you have to use two days of annual leave to have the appliances repaired. EVERY TIME... Seriously, bank your premium, and use it to buy new appliances as and when you need them. It will be much less hassle. Next time, I will buy Miele...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If an Engineer is telling you they deliberately don't advise of uneconomic repair, you should report them to D&G head office. The whole point of the engineers visit is to either repair or submit a report on the issues with a machine saying parts are not available or what the cost would be if over a certain sum. Following receipt of the report D&G would then advise what they were willing to do.

 

Suggest a written complaint to D&G head office and to consider an SAR to get copies of engineers reports received by them

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...