Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

DCA advice please - HSBC


suedes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4871 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi again everyone!

 

Im now being pursued by a "credit resource solutions" they have been phoning me and have written to me.

 

Is there anyway I can complain about this constant diffrent dca's getting in touch? surely somebody is breaking the rules here?

 

Do I need to go down the cca or sar route again?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure someone will be along shortly with a better answer, but you write to the new DCA letting them know the old one has broken the law in passing a disputed debt on without resolution.

 

Then ignor them unless they get shirty, then send a 31.14/16(?) request for what they would present in court, as you know they have nothing!

 

As always, double check that information is correct!

Andrew

 

Escaped the DCA nightmare, now helping others start businesses

www.ukleakdetection.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi everyone me again!

 

I sent the DCA the letter telling them that the account was in dispute with another DCA and they seem to have chose to ignore it as today I have recived a letter stating that they intend to take legal action, and they are providing me with the required 7 days of notice before obtaining a CCJ against me

 

Should I now be sending off the 31.14/16 request?

 

Im also a little bit peeved that they are basically ignoring what I am saying so I feel this needs to be taken further how do I do that?

 

Should I send a cca request to this DCA so they know where im coming from?

 

How does it look if it goes to court and they don't have a cca?

 

Sorry there is so many questions!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can anyone help me with the above points please?

 

Also how far are they likely to get in court without a CCA? would it be possible to have it thrown out before it went to court?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi suedes,

have you got copies of all the letters you have sent? And did you send everything Recorded Delivery and did you print off copies of the signatures from the Royal Mail site?

If so, then this should be all you need to get it thrown out of court.

The only thing you should be careful of is what kind of judge you get. If he/she is pro-consumer then you will be fine. But if he/she is pro-finance industry, then you have to be careful of any questions like "Did you have this Money" etc.

Dont answer "Yes" because then its game over for you. You simply say that you do not know ( because usually you dont recognise the amount as its probably loaded with charges etc).

Say as little as possible. This is to keep the onus constantly on the Claimant and make them prove your liability.

Dont help anyone.

This worked for me. There were a few scowls in court ( especially from the judge as I think it was tea-break, but I insisted that the Claimant prove their claim on the basis that I didnt ever remember owing anyone £2500+ - and then I shut up!)

So just be careful of any questioning and you will get it thrown out

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they phone dont answer any security question, then hang up

 

if someone turns up at your door you only need 2 words foof off , and if the wont leave tell them you are calling the police and shut the door

 

they have no legal rights whatsoever

 

there is plenty of info on the forum of letters you can send about no phone calls , visits and everything writting etc

 

"foof off"? My God, Ive been using the wrong words for years!!!:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite me asking them to contact me only in writing my wife informed me that I recived a text message saying they were now going down the legal route .

 

Merlin, I have copys of all the recent correspondance and everything from the latest sharks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

Today I have recived a letter from HL Legal & Collections solicitors in association with sampson & Co giving me 7 days to pay the outstanding balance or they will commence legal action

 

they say that they are acting on behalf of Credit Resource Solutions that are acting on behalf of hsbc

 

can anybody point me to the right section for the CPR procedure and do I do this now or when I recive court papers?

 

Also is there any way to find out who actually owns this debt? I have no knowledge of ever reciveing a notice of assingment.

 

And lastly can anyone tell me what should be on there letters eg licence numbers etc as there doesnt appear to be any only a reference to the solicitors regulation authority

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear.... some really silly going on here....

 

Send the following letter to the solicitors along with a new CCA request (also to the solicitors) in a seperate envelope. Both need to go off by rec. delivery. Sending a new CCA request is not strictly necessary but as it's now reached the stage of solicitors, you need to cover your bases against any dodgy arguments/moves. The letter below should make your actions perfectly clear....

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or to any company you claim to represent.

 

A legal request for a true copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement was sent to your client's clients on xx/xx/xx. To date however, the only document supplied has been a blank copy of a document that pertains to nobody at all; no signature, terms and conditions, APR/credit limit. As I'm sure you must be aware, the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is quite clear about what constitutes an legally enforceable document and what does not but for the avoidance of doubt, I respectfully suggest that you take a look at sec. 127(3) before starting to harrass me for payments against an unsubstantiated debt.

 

As an aside, I am quite confused over the number of clients alleged to be involved in this matter since my initial request was received, as it would seem that my details have been passed from your client's client's clients to yourselves without any written authority at all.

 

In all of this confusion and for the avoidance of any additional doubt, I thave therefore now arranged for a separate request for a true copy of any alleged Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act 1974) to reach your offices by recorded delivery over the next few days and would be grateful for your written confirmation as to whether you, your clients, or your client's client's clients currently hold, or have ever held, a legally enforceable and properly executed true copy of a Consumer Credit Agreement pertaining to myself. If not, I require you to confirm this in your response under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPUTR, 2008).

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:-)

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

the above letter seemed to have had some impact as the solicitors never acknowledged it and was promptly taken up by CRS again I wrote them a long complaint letter and sent a seperate cca request, a few days ago they rang up and spoke to my wife again (DPA anyone?) saying that they had closed there account with me.

 

Today I recived a letter from Lewis Debt Recovery dated 5th Jan giving me until the 12th to pay in full so it seems its been passed on again to the next lot I will write another letter stating this account is in dispute and send another cca request.

 

I feel its also time to complain to hsbc as they still own the debt and know its in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's actually no need to sent a fresh CCA request, despite the mucking about that's gone on so far..... write and inform Lewis that the account remains in dispute since your CCA request to XXXX on xx/xx/xx and until such times as your request is actioned, no payments will be forthcoming. You can enclose a copy of the letter in post #42 and refer them to it's content as well....... just so that they get the full picture. Send by rec. delivery....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is one point that has been missed out on this thread .All the bufoons who have written to you know quite well that they wouldnt stand a snowballs chance in hell of gaining anything by taking you to court , I personally would ignore their threats , as that is exactly what they are. I had 17,000 grands worth of debt with 7 companies some for 3 and 4 grand only one went down the court route, and they made a hash of that by getting a ccj in a court that had no jurisdiction over me, result an opology ccj removed and debt marked as satasfied. Read and file any more letters just dont respond..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not responding a not a good idea, in my opinion; ignoring letters that come from solicitors is being plain naive.... sorry.

 

Many companies will issue proceedings in the hope that they'll go undefended. If you want to do as much as possible to avoid that scenario, then a response/paper trail is vital unless it becomes absolutely obvious that the letters being churned out are generic. Only experience teaches you that one....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...